Assessment of seismic loss dependence using copula

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1076-1091

  Goda, Katsuichiro ^a   Ren, Jiandong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aggregate seismic loss; copula; dependence; risk management

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATE SEISMIC LOSS; ANALYSIS RESULTS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; COPULA FUNCTIONS; DISTRIBUTED STRUCTURES; ESTIMATION ERRORS; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS; FRACTILES; FRAME BUILDINGS; GROUND MOTIONS; HEAVY-TAILS; LOSS FREQUENCY; MARGINAL LOSS; PROBABILITY LEVELS; RANDOM COMPONENTS; REASONABLE ACCURACY; SEISMIC EFFECT; SEISMIC LOSS; SEISMIC RISK; SEISMIC RISK MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY MODEL; SPATIOTEMPORAL CORRELATION; TAIL DEPENDENCE;

AGGREGATES; BUILDINGS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION THEORY; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

SEISMOLOGY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BUILDING; CATASTROPHIC EVENT; DAMAGE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMICITY; SHOCK WAVE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA;

EID: 77954716381     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01408.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kleindorfer PR, Kunreuther HC. Challenges facing the insurance industry in managing catastrophic risks. Chapter 4 in Foot KA (eds). The Financing of Catastrophe Risk.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS-Earthquake - Technical Manual.
3. Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds). Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk.
4. Porter KA, Kiremidjian AS, LeGrue JS. Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation. Earthquake Spectra, 2001 17 : 291 312.
5. McGuire RK. Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis.
6. Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter KA, Stewart JP. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building - From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2007 36 : 1973 1997.
7. Chang SE, Shinozuka M, Moore JE. Probabilistic earthquake scenarios: Extending risk analysis methodologies to spatially distributed systems. Earthquake Spectra, 2000 16 : 173 219.
8. Crowley H, Bommer JJ. Modelling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2006 4 : 249 273.
9. Goda K, Hong HP. Estimation of seismic loss for spatially distributed buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 2008 24 : 889 910.
10. Yucemen MS, Yilmaz C, Erdik M. Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for important structures: Application to Gumusova-Gerede motorway. Structural Safety, 2008 30 : 420 435.
11. Venter G. Tails of copulas. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 2002 68 113.
12. McNeil, AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools.
13. Nelsen RB. An Introduction to Copulas.
14. Genest C, Rivest LP. Statistical inference procedures for bivariate Archimedean copulas. Journal of American Statistical Association, 1993 88 : 1034 1043.
15. Frees EW, Valdez EA. Understanding relationships using copulas. North American Actuarial Journal, 1998 2 : 1 25.
16. Daykin CD, Pentikainen T, Pesonen, M. Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries.
17. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2005 131 : 1013 1026.
18. Goda K, Hong, HP. Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008 98 : 354 365.
19. Hong HP, Zhang Y, Goda K. Effect of spatial correlation on estimated ground motion prediction equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2009 99 : 928 934.
20. Hong HP, Hong P. Assessment of ductility demand and reliability of bilinear single-degree-of-freedom systems under earthquake loading. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2007 34 : 1606 1615.
21. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures.
22. Ibarra LF. Global Collapses of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations.
23. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell, CA. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005 131 : 589 599.
24. Adams J, Halchuk S. Fourth Generation Seismic Hazard Maps of Canada: Values for Over 650 Canadian Localities Intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada.
25. Hong HP, Goda K. Orientation-dependent ground-motion measure for seismic-hazard assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2007 97 : 1525 1538.
26. Atkinson GM, Boore DM. Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2003 93 : 1703 1729.
27. National Research Council of Canada. National Building Code of Canada 2005.
28. Klugman, SA, Parsa, R. Fitting bivariate loss distributions with copulas. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 1999 24 : 139 148.
29. De Michele C, Salvadori G, Canossi M, Petaccia A, Rosso R. Bivariate statistical approach to check adequacy of dam spillway. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2005 10 : 50 57.
30. Genest C, Favre AC. Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2007 12 : 347 368.
31. Salvadori G, De Michele C, Kottegoda NT, Rosso R. Extremes in Nature.
32. Kleiber C, Kotz S. Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences.
33. Onur T. Seismic Risk Assessment in South Western British Columbia.
34. Cassidy JF, Rogers GC. Variation in ground shaking on the Fraser River delta (Greater Vancouver, Canada) from analysis of moderate earthquakes. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004 Paper No. 1010.
35. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Next Generation Attenuation Database. Available at : http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/, Accessed on April 6, 2006.
36. Cossette H, Gaillardetz P, Marceau E, Rioux J. On two dependent individual risk models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2002 30 : 153 166.
37. Cummins JD, Lewis CM, Phillips RD. Pricing excess of loss reinsurance contracts against catastrophic loss. Chapter 3 in Foot KA (eds). The Financing of Catastrophe Risk.
38. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974 19 : 716 723.