A stochastic approach to candidate disease gene subnetwork extraction

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1534-1538

  Amin, Mohammad Shafkat ^a   Bhattacharjee, Anupam ^a   Finley Jr , Russell L ^b   Jamil, Hasan ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

disease genes; protein protein interaction network; random walk

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; CANDIDATE GENES; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; EFFICIENT METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; HUMAN DISEASE; INTERACTING GENES; INTERACTION NETWORKS; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; RANDOM WALK; STOCHASTIC APPROACH; SUB-NETWORK; SUBNETWORKS;

ACTIVE NETWORKS; PROCESS CONTROL; PROTEINS;

GENES;

EID: 77954715619     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1774088.1774418     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Entrez gene. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=gene.
2. HPRD: Human Protein Reference Database. http://www.hprd.org.
3. IntAct-open source resource for molecular interaction data. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact.
4. G. Bader, D. Betel, and C. Hogue. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucl. Acids Res., 31:248-250, 2003.
5. J. Chen, B. Aronow, and A. Jegga. Disease candidate gene identification and prioritization using protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 10(1):73, 2009.
6. S. V. Date. Estimating protein function using protein-protein relationships. Methods Mol Biol., 408(12):109-127, 2007.
7. P. Dupont, J. Callut, G. Dooms, J.-N. Monette, and Y. Deville. Relevant subgraph extraction from random walks in a graph, (30): 2006-2007. Research Report.
8. J. Hardy and A. Singleton. Genomewide Association Studies and Human Disease. N Engl J Med, 360:1759-1768, 2009.
9. T. Ideker. Network genomics. Ernst Schering Foundation Symposium Proceedings, (61):89-115, 2007.
10. M. G. Kann. Protein interactions and disease: computational approaches to uncover the etiology of diseases. Brief Bioinform, 8(5):333-346, 2007.
11. S. Köhler, S. Bauer, D. Horn, and P. N. Robinson. Walking the interactome for prioritization of candidate disease genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 82(4):949-958, 2008.
12. V. A. McKusick. Mendelian Inheritance in Man. A Catalog of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 12 edition, 1998.
13. L. Salwinski, C. S. Miller, A. J. Smith, F. K. Pettit, J. U. Bowie, and D. Eisenberg. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucl. Acids Res., 32:449-451, 2004.
14. B. Schwikowski, P. Uetz, and S. Fields. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol, 18(12):1257-1261, 2000.
15. V. Spirin and L. A. Mirny. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA, 100(21):12123-12128, 2003.
16. C. Stark, B. J. Breitkreutz, T. Reguly, L. Boucher, A. Breitkreutz, and M. Tyers. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucl. Acids Res., 34:535-539, 2006.
17. P. Uetz and R. L. Finley Jr. From protein networks to biological systems. FEBS Letters, 579(8):1821-1827, 2005.
18. C. von Mering, L. J. Jensen, M. Kuhn, S. Chaffron, T. Doerks, B. Kruger, B. Snel, and P. Bork. STRING 7-recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucl. Acids Res., 35:358-362, 2007.