Gaining perspective through science: A history of research synthesis in reading

From Orthography to Pedagogy: Essays in Honor of Richard L. Venezky

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 193-210

  Shanahan, Timothy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954712848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613028     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Almasi, J. F., Garas, K., & Shanahan, L. (2002, December). Qualitative research and the report of the National Reading Panel: No methodology left behind? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
3. Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
4. Austin, M. C., & Morrison, C. W. (1961). The torch lighters: Tomorrow’s teachers of reading. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Austin, M. C., & Morrison, C. W. (1963). The first r: The Harvard Report on reading in elementary schools. New York: Macmillan.
6. Boring, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Cameron, E. H. (1913). Reading. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 351-353.
7. Camilli, G., Vargas, S., & Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives,11, 1-52.
8. Chall, J. S. (1958). Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus: Ohio State University.
9. Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Chall, J. S. (1984). Foreword. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Reading: A research retrospective,1881-1941. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbooks of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20, 37-54.
14. Downey, J. E. (1911). Graphic functions. Psychological Bulletin, 8, 311-317.
15. Glass, G. V. (1978). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
16. Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Retrieved September 10, 2004, from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/meta25.html
17. Gray, W. S. (1925). Summary of investigations relating to reading(Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Gray, W. S. (1926). Summary of reading investigations (July 1, 1924, to June 30, 1925). Elementary School Journal,26, 449-459, 507-518, 574-584, 662-673.
19. Gray, W. S. (1984). Reading. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Reading: A research retrospective, 1881-1941(pp. 1-89). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (Original work published 1941)
20. Gray, W. S., Gates, A. I., Horn, E., & Yoakam, G. A. (1935). Reading. Review of Educational Research, 5, 54-69.
21. Hall, G. S. (1895). Editorial note. American Journal of Psychology, 7, 3-8.
22. Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908)
23. Jackson, G. B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research,50, 438-460.
24. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups(NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Pearson, K. (1904). Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. British Medical Journal, 1243-1246.
27. Pearson, P. D. (1990). Foreword: How I came to know about Beginning to Read. In M. J. Adams (Ed.), Beginning to read(pp. v-viii). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Reed, J. G., & Baxter, P. M. (1994). Using reference databases. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis(pp. 58-70). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29. Rosenthal, T., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology,52, 59-82.
30. Shanahan, T. (2000). Research synthesis: Making sense of the accumulation of knowledge in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research(Vol. 3, pp. 209-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Shanahan, T. (2004). Critiques of the National Reading Panel report: Their implications for research, policy, and practice. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research(pp. 235-266). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32. Smith, N. B. (1965). American reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Sokal, M. M. (1981). An education in psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford Press.
36. Stevenson, J. (1985). William S. Gray, teacher, scholar, leader. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
37. Taylor, D. (1998). Beginning to read and the spin doctors of science. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
38. Tinker, M. A. (1927). Legibility and eye movement in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 621-639.
39. Tinker, M. A. (1929). Visual apprehension and perception in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 223-240.
40. Tinker, M. A. (1931). Physiological psychology of reading. Psychological Bulletin, 28, 81-98.
41. Tinker, M. A. (1933a). Diagnostic and remedial reading I. Elementary School Journal,33, 293-307.
42. Tinker, M. A. (1933b). Diagnostic and remedial reading II. Elementary School Journal,33, 346-358.
43. Tinker, M. A. (1937). Time taken by eye-movements in reading. Journal of Educational Research,30, 241-277.
44. Tinker, M. A. (1946). The study of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 93-120.
45. Tinker, M. A. (1958). Recent studies of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 215-231.
46. Venezky, R. L. (1984). The history of reading research. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research(pp. 3-38). New York: Longman.
47. Vernon, M. D. (1931). The experimental study of reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Woodworth, R. S. (1944). James McKeen Cattell, 1860-1944. Psychological Review, 51, 201-209.