Alternating current electric field effects on neural stem cell viability and differentiation

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 664-670

  Matos, Marvi A ^a   Cicerone, Marcus T ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electric field stimuli; Electrokinetics; Neural stem cell; Stem cell differentiation; Stem cell viability; Transport enhancement

Indexed keywords

ALGINATE HYDROGELS; ALTERNATING CURRENT; APPLIED FIELD; CELL VIABILITY; ELECTRIC FIELD MAGNITUDE; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION; STEM CELL; STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS;

CELL CULTURE; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTRIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; LITHIUM BATTERIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

STEM CELLS;

ALGINIC ACID; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID; MICROSPHERE; HYDROGEL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HYDROGEL; MICROELECTRODE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; PARTICLE SIZE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; STEM CELL; RADIATION RESPONSE;

ALGINATES; ANIMALS; ASTROCYTES; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SURVIVAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACIDS; HYDROGEL; MICE; MICROELECTRODES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSPHERES; NEURONS; PARTICLE SIZE; STEM CELLS;

MURINAE;

EID: 77954707949     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.389     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. TheCleveland Clinic. The Spinal Cord and Injury. Department of Patient Education and Health Information, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 2003. Available at: http://my.clevelandclinic.org.
2. Liaison OoCaP. NINDS Spinal Cord Injury Information Page. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD; 2005. Available at: http://www.ninds.nijh.gov/disorders/sci/sci.htm.
3. Klein S, Svendsen CN. Stem cells in the injured spinal cord: reducing the pain and increasing the gain. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:259-260.
4. Sommer L, Ma QF, Anderson DJ. Neurogenins, a novel family of atonal-related bHLH transcription factors, are putative mammalian neuronal determination genes that reveal progenitor cell heterogeneity in the developing CNS and PNS. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1996;8:221-241.
5. Winkler C, Fricker RA, Gates MA, Olsson M, Hammang JP, Carpenter MK, Bjorklund A. Incorporation and glial differentiation of mouse EGF-responsive neural progenitor cells after transplantation into the embryonic rat brain. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1998;11:99-116.
6. Bass NH, Hess HH, Pope A. Quantitative cytoarchitectonic distribution of neurons, glia, and DNA in rat cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1971;143:481.
7. Hatten ME, Shelanski ML. Mouse cerebellar granule neurons arrest the proliferation of human and rodent astrocytoma cells in vitro. J Neurosci. 1988;8:1447-1453.
8. Leuba G, Garey LJ. Comparison of neuronal and glial numerical density in primary and secondary visual cortex of man. Exp Brain Res. 1989;77:31-38.
9. Mahoney MJ, Anseth KS. Three-dimensional growth and function of neural tissue in degradable polyethylene glycol hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2265-2274.
10. Mahoney MJ, Anseth KS. Contrasting effects of collagen and bFGF-2 on neural cell function in degradable synthetic PEG hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81A:269-278.
11. Maguire T, Novik E, Schloss R, Yarmush M. Alginate-PLL microencapsulation: effect on the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into hepatocytes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93:581-591.
12. Wichterle H, Lieberam I, Porter JA, Jessell TM. Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons. Cell. 2002;110:385-397.
13. Horak D, Kroupova J, Slouf M, Dvorak P. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-based slabs as a mouse embryonic stem cell support. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5249-5260.
14. Kroupova J, Horak D, Pachernik J, Dvorak P, Slouf M. Functional polymer hydrogels for embryonic stem cell support. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76B:315-325.
15. Novikov LN, Novikova LN, Mosahebi A, Wiberg M, Terenghi G, Kellerth JO. A novel biodegradable implant for neuronal rescue and regeneration after spinal cord injury. Biomaterials. 2002;23:3369-3376.
16. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS. Synthetic hydrogels for biomedical applications. Acs Symp Ser. 1976;31:1-36.
17. Simmons CA, Alsberg E, Hsiong S, Kim WJ, Mooney DJ. Dual growth factor delivery and controlled scaffold degradation enhance in vivo bone formation by transplanted bone marrow stromal cells. Bone. 2004;35:562-569.
18. Woerly S. Porous hydrogels for neural tissue engineering. Porous Mater Tissue Eng. 1997;250:53-68.
19. Woerly S, Pinet E, De Robertis L, Bousmina M, Laroche G, Roitback T, Vargova L, Sykova E. Heterogeneous PHPMA hydrogels for tissue repair and axonal regeneration in the injured spinal cord. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9:681-711.
20. Woerly S, Petrov P, Sykova E, Roitbak T, Simonova Z, Harvey AR. Neural tissue formation within porous hydrogels implanted in brain and spinal cord lesions: Ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and diffusion studies. Tissue Eng. 1999;5:467-488.
21. Sanborn TJ, Messersmith PB, Barron AE. In situ crosslinking of a biomimetic peptide-PEG hydrogel via thermally triggered activation of factor XIII. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2703-2710.
22. Washburn NR, Simon CG, Tona A, Elgendy HM, Karim A, Amis EJ. Co-extrusion of biocompatible polymers for scaffolds with co-continuous morphology. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:20-29.
23. Horak D, Cervinka M, Puza V. Hydrogels in endovascular embolization. 6. Toxicity tests of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) particles on cell cultures. Biomaterials. 1997;18:1355-1359.
24. Lee JH, Kim WG, Kim SS, Lee HB. Development and characterization of an alginate-impregnated polyester vascular graft. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:200-208.
25. Woerly S, Pinet E, de Robertis L, Van Diep D, Bousmina M. Spinal cord repair with PHPMA hydrogel containing RGD peptides (NeuroGel). Biomaterials. 2001;22:1095-1111.
26. Prang P, Muller R, Eljaouhari A, Heckmann K, Kunz W, Weber T, Faber C, Vroemen M, Bogdahn U, Weidner N. The promotion of oriented axonal regrowth in the injured spinal cord by alginate-based anisotropic capillary hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3560-3569.
27. Favre E, Leonard M, Laurent A, Dellacherie E. Diffusion of polyethyleneglycols in calcium alginate hydrogels. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2001;194:197-206.
28. Zhao M, Song B, Pu J, Wada T, Reid B, Tai GP, Wang F, Guo AH, Walczysko P, Gu Y, Sasaki T, Suzuki A, Forrester JV, Bourne HR, Devreotes PN, McCaig CD, Penninger JM. Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol- 3-OH kinase-gamma and PTEN. Nature. 2006;442:457-460.
29. Alat I, Inan M, Gurses I, Kekilli E, Germen B, Harma A, Eskin A, Aydin OM. The mechanical or electrical induction of medullary angiogenesis: will it improve sternal wound healing? Tex Heart Inst J. 2004;31:363-367.
30. Reid B, Song B, Mccaig CD, Zhao M. Wound healing in rat cornea: the role of electric currents. FASEB J. 2005;19:379-386.
31. Sauer H, Rahimi G, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M. Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 1999;75:710-723.
32. Sauer H, Bekhite MM, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M. Redox control of angiogenic factors and CD31-positive vessel-like structures in mouse embryonic stem cells after direct current electrical field stimulation. Exp Cell Res. 2005;304:380-390.
33. Christanti Y, Walker LM. Quantifying air atomization of viscoelastic fluids through fluid relaxation times. Atomization and Sprays. 2006;16:777-790.
34. Matos MA, White LR, Tilton RD. Electroosmotically enhanced mass transfer through polyacrylamide gels. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;300:429-436.
35. Matos M, White LR, Tilton RD. Enhanced mixing in polyacrylamide gels containing embedded silica nanoparticles as internal electroosmotic pumps. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2008;61:262-269.
36. Burke L, Nugent PF. The electrochemistry of gold. II. The electrocatalytic behaviour of the metal in aqueous media. Gold Bull. 1998;31:39-50.
37. Galban CJ, Locke BR. Effects of spatial variation of cells and nutrient and product concentrations coupled with product inhibition on cell growth in a polymer scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;64:633-643.
38. Galban CJ, Locke BR. Analysis of cell growth kinetics and substrate diffusion in a polymer scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;65:121-132.
39. Muschler GF, Midura RJ, Nakamoto C. Practical modeling concepts for connective tissue stem cell and progenitor compartment kinetics. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2003;2003:170-193.
40. Glicklis R, Merchuk JC, Cohen S. Modeling mass transfer in hepatocyte spheroids via cell viability, spheroid size, and hepatocellular functions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;86:672-680.