Quo vadis, clone management?

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 85-86

  Harder, Jan ^a   Göde, Nils ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

clone management; cost benefit analysis; software maintenance

Indexed keywords

CLONE MANAGEMENT; COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; COSTS AND BENEFITS; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; VERSION CONTROL SYSTEM;

CLONING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77954704110     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1808901.1808917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. L. Jiang, Z. Su, and E. Chiu. Context-based detection of clone-related bugs. In Proceedings of the ESEC/FSE, pages 55-64. ACM, 2007.
2. E. Juergens, F. Deissenboeck, B. Hummel, and S. Wagner. Do code clones matter? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 485-495. IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
3. C. J. Kapser and M. W. Godfrey. "Cloning considered harmful" considered harmful. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 19-28. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
4. Z. Li, S. Lu, S. Myagmar, and Y. Zhou. CP-Miner: Finding copy-paste and related bugs in large-scale software code. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(3):176-192, 2006.