Ghostwriting: Stringent disclosure policies take aim at authorship abuses

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 265-266

  Nahai, Foad ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISCLOSURE; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 77954703752     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1090820X10370167     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Nahai F. Managing conflicts of interest: who is responsible? Aesthet Surg J 2009 ; 29 (4). 330-332.
2. Ferris LE, Fletcher RH Conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals: the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) position on a challenging problem. Neurosurgery 2010 ; 66 (4). 629-630.
3. Krimsky S., Rothenberg LS Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 ; 7 (2). 205-218.
4. Singer N. Medical papers by ghostwriters pushed therapy. The New York Times ; 2009, August 5, p. A1.
5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, 2008. Available at http://www.icmje.org/urm-main.html. Last accessed September 27, 2009.
6. The game of ghost writing, September 11, 2009. Available at www.insidehighered.com. Last accessed September 27, 2009.