A comparison of water flux measurements: Passive wick-samplers versus drainage lysimeters

European Journal of Soil Science

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 609-621

  Meissner, R ^a   Rupp, H ^a   Seeger, J ^a   Ollesch, G ^a   Gee, G W ^b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; LYSIMETER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SANDY SOIL; SOIL SURFACE; SOIL WATER; UNSATURATED MEDIUM; WATER FLOW;

GERMANY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954696733     PISSN: 13510754     EISSN: 13652389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01255.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aboukhaled A, Alfaro A, Smith M. Lysimeters 1982, FAO, Rome
2. Allen RG, Howell TA, Pruitt WO, Walter IA, Jensen ME. Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lysimetry 1991, 79-84. In:, pp., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY
3. Allison GB, Gee GW, Tyler SW. Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1994, 58:6-14.
4. Ben-Gal A, Shani U. A highly conductive drainage extension to control the lower boundary condition of lysimeters. Plant & Soil 2002, 239:9-17.
5. Boll J, Steenhuis TS, Selker JS. Fiberglass wicks for sampling of water and solutes in the vadose zone. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1992, 56:701-707.
6. Brandi-Dohrn FM, Dick RP, Hess M, Selker JS. Field evaluation of passive capillary samplers. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1996, 60:1705-1713.
7. Chambers PA, Meissner PA, Wrona FJ, Rupp H, Guhr H, Seeger J. Changes in nutrient loading in an agricultural watershed and its effects on water quality and stream biota. Hydrobiologia 2006, 556:399-415.
8. Soil Map of the World. 1990, FAO, World Soil Resources Report 60. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations,, Rome
9. Gee GW, Hillel D. Groundwater recharge in arid regions: review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrological Processes 1988, 2:255-266.
10. Gee GW, Ward AL, Caldwell TG, Ritter JC. A vadose-zone water fluxmeter with divergence control. Water Resources Research 2002, 38:1141-1147.
11. Gee GW, Zhang ZF, Ward AL. A modified vadose-zone fluxmeter with solution collection capability. Vadose Zone Journal 2003, 2:627-632.
12. Gee GW, Ward AL, Zhang ZF, Anandacoomaraswamy A. Use of water fluxmeters to measure drainage. Proceedings of the 8th International Drainage Symposium, Sacramento, CA 2004, 321-331. Cooke RA, In:, (ed., pp., ASAE, St Joseph, MI
13. Gee GW, Newman BD, Green SR, Meissner R, Rupp H, Zhang ZF. Passive wick fluxmeters: design considerations and field applications. Water Resources Research 2009, 45:1-18.
14. Haferkorn U. Größen des Wasserhaushaltes verschiedener Böden unter landwirtschaftlicher Nutzung im klimatischen Grenzraum des Mitteldeutschen Trockengebietes - Ergebnisse der Lysimeterstation Brandis. 2000, Doctoral dissertation,, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
15. Hendrickx JMH, Walker GR. Recharge from precipitation. Recharge of Phreatic Aquifers in (Semi-)Arid Areas 1997, 19-111. Simmers I, In:, (ed., pp., Balkema, Rotterdam
16. Holder M, Brown KW, Thomas JC, Zabcik D, Murray HE. Capillary-wick unsaturated zone soil pore water sampler. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1991, 55:1195-1202.
17. Klaghofer E. Bodenphysikalische Aspekte bei der Erfassung von gelösten Stoffen mit Hilfe von Lysimetern. Proceedings of the 1st Lysimeter Conference 1991, 14-20. Chytil K. (ed., pp., BAL, Gumpenstein
18. Knappe S, Haferkorn U, Meissner R. Influence of different agricultural management systems on nitrogen leaching: results of lysimeter studies. Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science 2002, 165:73-77.
19. Knoblauch S. Langjährige Ergebnisse über das pflanzliche Aneignungsvermögen von Bodenwasser landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen in einem tiefgründigen Braunerde-Tschernosem aus Löß. Proceedings of the 13th Lysimeter Conference 2009, 131-136. pp., LFZ, Raumberg, Gumpenstein
20. Knutson JH, Selker JS. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivities of fiberglass wicks and designing capillary wick pore-water samplers. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1994, 58:721-729.
21. Lanthaler C, Fank J. Lysimeter stations and soil hydrology measuring sites in Europe - results of a 2004 survey. Proceedings of the 11th Lysimeter Conference 2005, 19-24. pp., LFZ, Raumberg, Gumpenstein
22. Leinweber P, Meissner R, Eckhardt K-U, Seeger J. Management effects on forms of phosphorus in soil and leaching losses. European Journal of Soil Science 1999, 50:413-424.
23. Louie MJ, Shelby PM, Smesrud JS, Gatchell LO, Selker JS. Field evaluation of passive capillary samplers for estimating groundwater recharge. Water Resources Research 2000, 36:2407-2416.
24. Marek TH, Schneider AD, Howell TA, Ebeling LL. Design and construction of large weighing monolithic lysimeters. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural & Biological Engineers 1988, 31:477-484.
25. Meissner R, Rupp H, Schubert M. Novel lysimeter techniques: a basis for the improved investigation of water, gas and solute transport in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science 2000, 163:603-608.
26. Meissner R, Seeger J, Rupp H, Seyfarth M, Borg H. Measurement of dew, fog and rime with a high-precision gravitation lysimeter. Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science 2007, 170:335-344.
27. Meissner R, Rupp H, Seyfarth M. Advances in out door lysimeter techniques. Water, Air & Soil Pollution: Focus 2008, 8:217-225.
28. Mertens J, Diels J, Feyen J, Vanderborght J. Numerical analysis of passive capillary wick samplers prior to field installation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2007, 71:35-42.
29. Rimmer A, Steenhuis TS, Selker JS. One-dimensional model to evaluate the performance of wick sampler in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1995, 59:88-92.
30. Schoen R, Gaudet JP, Bariac T. Preferential flow and solute transport in a large lysimeter under controlled boundary conditions. Journal of Hydrology 1999, 215:70-81.
31. Siemens J, Kaupenjohann M. Comparison of three methods for field measurement of solute leaching in a sandy soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2004, 68:1191-1196.
32. Tyler SW, Scanlon BR, Gee GW, Allison GB. Water and solute transport in arid vadose zones: innovations in measurement and analysis. Vadose Zone Hydrology 1999, 334-373. Parlange MB, Hopmans JW, (eds., pp., Oxford University Press, New York
33. Van der Velde M, Green SR, Gee GW, Vanclooster M, Clothier BE. Evaluation of drainage from passive suction and non-suction fluxmeters in a volcanic clay soil under tropical conditions. Vadose Zone Journal 2005, 4:1201-1209.
34. Weihermüller L, Siemens J, Deurer M, Knoblauch S, Rupp H, Göttlein A. In situ soil water extraction: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 2007, 36:1735-1748.
35. Zhu Y, Fox RH, Toth JD. Leachate collection efficiency of zero-tension pan and passive capillary fiber wick lysimeters. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2002, 66:37-43.