Assemblage grouping of European benthic diatoms as indicators of trophic status of rivers

Fundamental and Applied Limnology

Volumn 176, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 89-100

  Fisher, J ^a,c   Deflandre Viandas, A ^a   Coste, M ^b   Delmas, F ^b   Jarvie, H P ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diatom assemblage; Eutrophication; Rivers; Water framework directive

Indexed keywords

BENTHOS; BIOINDICATOR; BIOTYPE; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; DIATOM; EUTROPHICATION; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; TROPHIC STATUS; TWINSPAN; WATER QUALITY;

EUROPE;

BACILLARIOPHYTA;

EID: 77954682319     PISSN: 18639135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2010/0176-0089     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barko, J. W., Gunnison, D. & Carpenter, S. R., 1991: Sediment interactions with submerged macrophyte growth and community dynamics. - Aquat. Bot. 41: 41-65.
2. Biggs, J. F. B., 1996: Hydraulic habitat of plants in streams. Regul. Riv. 12: 131-144.
3. Cai, L., 2004: Multi-response Permutation Procedure as An Alternative to the Analysis of Variance: An SPSS Implementation. - Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina.
4. Cardoso, A. C., Duchemin, J., Magoarou, P. & Premazzi, G., 2001: Criteria for the identification of fresh waters subject to eutrophication: their use for the implementation of the "nitrates" and Urban Waste Water Treatment Directives. - Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
5. Charles, D. F., Acker, F. W., Hart, D. D., Reimer, C. W. & Cotter, P. B., 2006: Large scale regional variation in diatomwater chemistry relationships: rivers of the eastern United States. - Hydrobiologia 561: 27-57.
6. Descy, J. P., 1979: A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms. - Nova Hedwigia 64: 305-323.
7. Environment Agency, 1998: The quality of rivers in England and Wales; a proposed management strategy. - Environmental issues Series. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK, pp. 36.
8. European Communities, 2000: Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
9. European Communities, 2005: Relationships between pressures, chemical status and biological quality elements. - In: Heiskanen, A. S. & Solimnini, A. G. (eds): Analysis of the current knowledge gaps for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. - European Commission, Directorate General, JRC, Italy.
10. Foerster, J., Gutowski, A. & Schaumburg, J., 2004: Defining types of running waters in Germany using benthic algae: A prerequisite for monitoring according to the Water Framework Directive. - J. Appl. Phycol. 16: 407-418.
11. Fore, L. S. & Grafe, C., 2002: Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (U. S.A.). - Freshwat. Biol. 47: 2015-2037. (Pubitemid 35181219)
12. Gosselain, V., Campeau, S., Gevrey, M., Coste, M., Ector, L., Rimet, F., Tison, J., Delmas, F., Park, Y. S., Lek, S. & Descy, J. P., 2005: Diatom typology of low-impact conditions at a multi-regional scale: combined results of multivariate analyses and SOM. - In: Lek, S., Scardi, M., Verdonschot, P. F. M., Descy, J. P.& Park, Y. S. (eds): Modelling Community Structure in freshwater ecosystems. - Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 317-342.
13. Hall, R. I., Leavitt, P. R., Quinlan, R., Dixit, A. S. & Smol, J. P., 1999: Effects of organic, urbanisation and climate on water quality in the Northern Great Plains. - Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 739-756.
14. Hill, M. O. & Šmilauer, P., 2005: WinTWINS version 2.3: TWINSPAN for windows.
15. Hustedt, F., 1937-1939: Systematische und ökologische Untersuchungen über den Diatomeen-Flora von Java, Bali, Sumatra. -Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 15 & 16.
16. Huttunen, P. & Merilainen, J., 1983: Interpretation of lake quality from contemporary diatom assemblages. - Hydrobiologia 103: 91-97 (Pubitemid 16271733)
17. Jeppesen, E., Sondergaard, M., Jensen, J. P., Havens, K. E., Anneville, O., Carvalho, L., Coveney, M. F., Deneke, R., Dokulil, M. T., Foy, R., Gerdeaux, D., Hampton, S. E., Hilt, S., Kangur, K., Kohler, J., Lammens, E. H. H. R., Lauridsen, T. L., Manca, M., Miracle, M. R., Moss, B., Noges, P., Persson, G., Phillips, G., Portielje, R., Romo, S., Schelske, C. L., Straile, D., Tatrai, I., Willen, E. & Winder, M., 2005: Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading - an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. - Freshwat. Biol. 50: 1747-1771.
18. Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F. & van Tongeren, O. F. R., 1995: Data Analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Kahlert, M., Albert, R-L., Anttila, E-L., Bengtsson, R., Bigler, C., Eskola, T., Gälman, V., Gottschalk, S., Herlitz, E., Jarlman, A., Kasperoviciene, J., Kokocinski, M., Luup, H., Miettinen, J., Paunksnyte, I., Piirsoo, K., Quintana, I., Raunio, J., Sandell, B., Simola, H., Sundberg, I., Vilbaste, S. & Weckström, J., 2009: Harmonization is more important than experience - results of the first Nordic-Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise 2007 (stream monitoring). - J. Appl. Phycol. 21:471-482.
20. Kelly, M. G. & Whitton, B. A., 1995: The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. - J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433-444.
21. Kelly, M. G., Cazaubon, A., Coring, E., Dell' Uomo, A., Ector, L., Goldsmith, B., Guasch, H., Hurlimann, J., Jarlman, A., Kawecka, B., Kwandrans, J., Laugaste, R., Lindstrom, E. A., Leitao, M., Marvan, P., Padisak, J., Pipp, E., Prygiel, J., Rott, E., Sabater, S., van Dam, H. & Vizinet, J., 1998: Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. - J. Appl. Phycol. 10: 215-224.
22. Kelly, M. G., Adams, C., Graves, A. C., Jamieson, J., Krakowski, J., Lycett, E. B., Murry-Bligh, J., Pritchard, S. & Wilkins, C., 2001: The Trophic Diatom Index: A users manual - revised edition. - R&D Technical Report E2/TR2.
23. Kelly, M. G., 2003: Short term dynamics of diatoms in an upland stream and implications for monitoring eutrophication. -Environ. Pollut. 125: 117-122.
24. Kelly, M., Juggins, S., Guthrie, R., Pritchard, S., Jamieson, J., Rippey, B., Hirst, H. & Yallop, M., 2008a: Assessment of ecological status in U. K. rivers using diatoms. - Freshwat. Biol. 53: 403-422.
25. Kelly, M., King, L. & Ni Chatháïn, B., 2008b: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Biology and the Environment.
26. Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Darchambeau, F., Cabana, G. & Dillon, P. J., 2008: Are diatoms good integrators of temporal variability in stream water quality. - Freshwat. Biol. 53: 827-841.
27. Lecointe, C., Coste, M. & Prygiel, J., 1993: Omnidia - Software for Taxonomy, Calculation of Diatom Indexes and Inventories Management. - Hydrobiologia 269: 509-513.
28. Leira, M. & Sabater, S., 2005: Diatom assemblages distribution in Catalan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. - Water Res. 39: 73-82. (Pubitemid 40017757)
29. Rott, E., Hofmann, G., Pall, K., Pfister, P. & Pipp, E., 1997: Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen. Teil 1: Saprobielle Indikation. - Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Wien, Austria.
30. Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Hofmann, G., Stelzer, D., Schneider, S. & Schmedtje, U., 2004: Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes - a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. - Limnologica 34: 302-314. (Pubitemid 40102829)
31. Soininen, J., 2002: Responses of epilithic diatom communities to environmental gradients in some Finnish rivers. - Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87: 11-24
32. Soininen, J. & Kononen, K., 2004: Comparative study of monitoring South-Finnish rivers and streams using macroinvertebrates and benthic diatom community structure. - Aquat. Ecol. 38: 63-75.
33. Snyder, E. B., Robinson, C. T., Minshall, G. W. & Ruishforth, S. R., 2002: Regional patterns in periphyton accrual and diatom assemblage structure in a heterogeneous nutrient landscape. - Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 564-577.
34. ter Braak C. J. F. & Šmilauer, P., 2002: CANOCO for Windows (version 4.5). - Centre for Biometry, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
35. Tison, J., Park, Y. S., Coste, M., Wasson, J. G., Ector, L., Rimet, F. & Delmas, F., 2005: Typology of diatom communties and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: A study on the French hydrosystem scale.-Water Res. 39: 3177-3188.
36. UK TAG., 2007: Recommendations on surface water classification schemes for the purposes of the Water Framework Directive. December 2007.
37. van Dam, H., Mertens, A. & Sinkeldam, J., 1994: A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. - Netherl. J. Aquat. Ecol. 28: 117-133.
38. Vyerman, W., Verleyen, E., Sabbe, K., Vanhoutte, K., Sterken, M., Hodgson, D. A., Mann, D. A., Juggins, S., Van de Vilver, B., Jones, V., Flower, R., Roberts, D., Chepurnov, V. A., Kilroy, C., Vanormelingen, P. & De Wever, A., 2007: Historical processes constrain patterns in global diatom diversity. -Ecology 88: 1924-1931. (Pubitemid 351345157)
39. Vinebrooke, R. D., 1996: Abiotic and biotic regulation of periphyton in recovery of acidified lakes. - J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 15: 318-331