Systematic Review of Medial Parapatellar and Subvastus Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 728-734

  Bourke, Michael G ^a,b   Buttrum, Peter J ^a   FitzPatrick, Prudence L ^a   Dalton, Philip A ^a   Jull, Gwendolen A ^b   Russell, Trevor G ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND HEALTH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Medial parapatellar; Subvastus; TKA

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATELLA; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954660529     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association, National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2007, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Adelaide.
2. Cameron S. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar arthrotomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Appl Res 2001, 1(suppl 2):95.
3. Cila E. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002, 122(suppl 2):65.
4. Faure B. Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8(suppl 5):511.
5. Hofmann A. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991, 269:70.
6. Matsueda M. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000, 371:161.
7. Roysam G. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16(suppl 4):454.
8. von Langenbeck B. Zur resection des kniegelenks. Verh Dtsch Ges Churg 1878, VII:23.
9. Holtby R. Osteonecrosis and resorption of the patella after total knee replacement: a case report. Clin Orthop 1996, 328:155.
10. Kayler D. Surgical interruption of patellar blood supply by total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988, 229:221.
11. Scuderi G. The relationship of lateral releases to patella viability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987, 2(suppl 3):209.
12. Erkes F. Weitere erfahrungen mit physiologischer schnitt fuhrung zur eroffnung des kniegelenks. Bruns Beitr Klin Chir 1929, 147:221.
13. Cushner F. The subvastus approach to the knee. J Knee Surg 2003, 16(suppl 1):52.
14. Knezevich S. Comparison of subvastus quadriceps-sparing and standard quadriceps-splitting approaches in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 1992, 16:615.
15. Sporer S. The minimally invasive subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006, 19(suppl 1):58.
16. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England. version 5.0.1 [updated February 2008]. J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green (Eds.).
17. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 2001, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England. 4.1.4. M. Clarke (Ed.).
18. Jadad A. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized and controlled trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials 1996, 17:1.
19. Khan R Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, CD005329. 10.1002/14651858.CD005329.
20. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Government, NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. PILOT PROGRAM 2005-2007.
21. Weinhardt C. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004, 124(suppl 6):401.