Learning Curve With Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 735-740

  Hamilton, William G ^a   Ammeen, Deborah ^a   Engh, C Anderson ^a   Engh, Gerard A ^a  

^a ANDERSON ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Knee arthroplasty; Learning curve; Minimally invasive; Unicompartmental

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954659537     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Repicci J.A., Eberle R.W. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1999, 8:20.
2. Rougraff B.T., Heck D.A., Gibson A.E. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 157.
3. Price A.J., Webb J., Topf H., et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:970.
4. Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., et al. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep, 21(6 Suppl 2):98.
5. Berger R.A., Nedeff D.D., Barden R.M., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 50.
6. Kozinn S.C., Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989, 71:145.
7. Deshmukh R.V., Scott R.D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 272.
8. Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Hoeffel D.P., et al. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 272.
9. Squire M.W., Callaghan J.J., Goetz D.D., et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 61.
10. Laurencin C.T., Zelicof S.B., Scott R.D., et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 151.
11. Newman J.H., Ackroyd C.E., Shah N.A. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:862.
12. Knutson K., Lindstrand A., Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986, 68:795.
13. Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., et al. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:519.
14. Howe D.J., Taunton O.D., Engh G.A. Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:2283.
15. Mariani E.M., Bourne M.H., Jackson R.T., et al. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):81.
16. Graves S., Davidson D., Ingerson L., et al. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004, 180(5 Suppl):S31.