Use of microindentation to characterize the mechanical properties of articular cartilage: Comparison of biphasic material properties across length scales

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1051-1057

  Miller, G J ^a   Morgan, E F ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Articular cartilage; Biphasic; Finite element modeling; Indentation; Permeability; Poroelastic

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CATTLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 77954659280     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Armstrong C.G., Mow V.C. Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64:88-94.
2. Stolz M., Gottardi R., Raiteri R., Miot S., Martin I., Imer R., et al. Early detection of aging cartilage and osteoarthritis in mice and patient samples using atomic force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4:186-192.
3. Hu K., Radhakrishnan P., Patel R.V., Mao J.J. Regional structural and viscoelastic properties of fibrocartilage upon dynamic nanoindentation of the articular condyle. J Struct Biol 2001, 136:46-52.
4. Stolz M., Raiteri R., Daniels A.U., VanLandingham M.R., Baschong W., Aebi U. Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2004, 86:3269-3283.
5. Tomkoria S., Patel R.V., Mao J.J. Heterogeneous nanomechanical properties of superficial and zonal regions of articular cartilage of the rabbit proximal radius condyle by atomic force microscopy. Med Eng Phys 2004, 26:815-822.
6. Ebenstein D.M., Kuo A., Rodrigo J.J., Reddi A.H., Ries M., Pruitt L. A nanoindentation technique for functional evaluation of cartilage repair tissue. J Mater Res 2004, 19:273-281.
7. Hyttinen M.M., Toyras J., Lapvetelainen T., Lindblom J., Prockop D.J., Li S.W., et al. Inactivation of one allele of the type II collagen gene alters the collagen network in murine articular cartilage and makes cartilage softer. Ann Rheum Dis 2001, 60:262-268.
8. Li C., Pruitt L.A., King K.B. Nanoindentation differentiates tissue-scale functional properties of native articular cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 78:729-738.
9. Li X., An Y.H., Wu Y.D., Song Y.C., Chao Y.J., Chien C.H. Microindentation test for assessing the mechanical properties of cartilaginous tissues. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007, 80:25-31.
10. Park S., Costa K.D., Ateshian G.A., Hong K.S. Mechanical properties of bovine articular cartilage under microscale indentation loading from atomic force microscopy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2009, 223:339-347.
11. Lai W.M., Mow V.C., Zhu W. Constitutive modeling of articular cartilage and biomacromolecular solutions. J Biomech Eng 1993, 115:474-480.
12. Cao L., Youn I., Guilak F., Setton L.A. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model. J Biomech Eng 2006, 128:766-771.
13. Hu K., Xu L., Cao L., Flahiff C.M., Brussiau J., Ho K., et al. Pathogenesis of osteoarthritis-like changes in the joints of mice deficient in type IX collagen. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54:2891-2900.
14. Gupta S., Lin J., Ashby P., Pruitt L. A fiber reinforced poroelastic model of nanoindentation of porcine costal cartilage: a combined experimental and finite element approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009, 2:326-337. discussion 337-328.
15. Chiravarambath S., Simha N.K., Namani R., Lewis J.L. Poroviscoelastic cartilage properties in the mouse from indentation. J Biomech Eng 2009, 131:011004.
16. Chen A.C., Bae W.C., Schinagl R.M., Sah R.L. Depth- and strain-dependent mechanical and electromechanical properties of full-thickness bovine articular cartilage in confined compression. J Biomech 2001, 34:1-12.
17. Khalsa P.S., Eisenberg S.R. Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure. J Biomech 1997, 30:589-594.
18. Kaufman J.D., Miller G.J., Morgan E.F., Klapperich C.M. Time-dependent mechanical characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels using nanoindentation and unconfined compression. J Mater Res 2008, 23:1472-1481.
19. Roemhildt M.L., Coughlin K.M., Peura G.D., Fleming B.C., Beynnon B.D. Material properties of articular cartilage in the rabbit tibial plateau. J Biomech 2006, 39:2331-2337.
20. Mow V.C., Kuei S.C., Lai W.M., Armstrong C.G. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng 1980, 102:73-84.
21. Keenan K.E., Kourtis L.C., Besier T.F., Lindsey D.P., Gold G.E., Delp S.L., et al. New resource for the computation of cartilage biphasic material properties with the interpolant response surface method. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2009, 12:415-422.
22. Hale J.E., Rudert M.J., Brown T.D. Indentation assessment of biphasic mechanical property deficits in size-dependent osteochondral defect repair. J Biomech 1993, 26:1319-1325.
23. Athanasiou K.A., Rosenwasser M.P., Buckwalter J.A., Malinin T.I., Mow V.C. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res 1991, 9:330-340.
24. Athanasiou K.A., Zhu C.F., Wang X., Agrawal C.M. Effects of aging and dietary restriction on the structural integrity of rat articular cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 2000, 28:143-149.
25. Warner M.D., Taylor W.R., Clift S.E. A method for automatically determining contact between a non-porous surface and articular cartilage in a biphasic FE model. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2001, 207-212. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Lisbon, Portugal.
26. Maroudas A. Physicochemical properteis of cartilage in light of ion-exchange theory. Biophys J 1968, 8:575-595.
27. Buschmann M.D., Soulhat J., Shirazi-Adl A., Jurvelin J.S., Hunziker E.B. Confined compression of articular cartilage: linearity in ramp and sinusoidal tests and the importance of interdigitation and incomplete confinement. J Biomech 1998, 31:171-178.
28. Gervaso F., Pennati G., Boschetti F. Effect of geometrical imperfections in confined compression tests on parameter evaluation of hydrated soft tissues. J Biomech 2007, 40:3041-3044.
29. Reynaud B., Quinn T.M. Anisotropic hydraulic permeability in compressed articular cartilage. J Biomech 2006, 39:131-137.
30. Jurvelin J.S., Buschmann M.D., Hunziker E.B. Mechanical anisotropy of the human knee articular cartilage in compression. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2003, 217:215-219.
31. Greene G.W., Zappone B., Zhao B., Soderman O., Topgaard D., Rata G., et al. Changes in pore morphology and fluid transport in compressed articular cartilage and the implications for joint lubrication. Biomaterials 2008, 29:4455-4462.
32. Leddy H.A., Haider M.A., Guilak F. Diffusional anisotropy in collagenous tissues: fluorescence imaging of continuous point photobleaching. Biophys J 2006, 91:311-316.
33. Federico S., Herzog W. On the anisotropy and inhomogeneity of permeability in articular cartilage. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2008, 7:367-378.
34. Maroudas A. Transport of solutes through cartilage: permeability to large molecules. J Anat 1976, 122:335-347.
35. Torzilli P.A., Adams T.C., Mis R.J. Transient solute diffusion in articular cartilage. J Biomech 1987, 20:203-214.