Sources of fine particles in the South Coast area, California

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 44, Issue 26, 2010, Pages 3095-3100

  Kim, Eugene ^a   Turkiewicz, Katarzyna ^a   Zulawnick, Sylvia A ^a   Magliano, Karen L ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD   (United States)

Author keywords

PM2.5; Source apportionment; South Coast Basin; Speciation trends network

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC DIAMETERS; AIRBORNE SOILS; BIOMASS SMOKE; CALIFORNIA; DIESEL EMISSION; FINE PARTICLES; GASOLINE VEHICLE; LEAST SQUARE ALGORITHMS; MONITORING SITES; NON-NEGATIVITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; SEA SALTS; SECONDARY PARTICLES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS; SOURCE IDENTIFICATION; SOURCE PROFILES; SOUTH COAST BASIN; SPECIATION DATA; SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK; STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL;

NITRATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SULFATE;

COASTAL ZONE; MONITORING; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; SEA SALT; SPECIATION (CHEMISTRY); TRAFFIC EMISSION;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; EXHAUST GAS; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL; UNITED STATES;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; RUBIDOUX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954657182     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.037     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 2.5 Attainment 2007, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, Available at:, (accessed 23.10.09). http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/2007sip/southcoast/staffrepappb.pdf.
2. Christoforou C.S., Salmon L.G., Hanning M.P., Solomon P.A., Cass G.R. Trends in fine particle concentration and chemical composition in southern California. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 2000, 50:43-53.
3. Eatough D.J., Aghdaie N., Cottam M., Gammon T., Hansen L.D., Lewis E.A., Farber R.J. Loss of semi-volatile organic compounds from particles during sampling on filters. Transactions, Visibility and Fine Particles 1990, 146-156. Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA. C.V. Mathai (Ed.).
4. Federal Register, 1997. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter. Federal Register 40 CFR Part 50 62 (138).
5. Gao N., Cheng M.-D., Hopke P.K. Receptor modeling of airborne ionic species collected in SCAQS. Atmospheric Environment 1994, 28(8):1447-1470.
6. Held T., Ying Q., Kleeman M.J., Schauer J.J., Fraser M.P. A comparison of the UCD/CIT air quality model and the CMB source-receptor model for primary airborne particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39:2281-2297.
7. Katrinak K.A., Anderson J.R., Buseck P.R. Individual particle types in the aerosol of Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Science & Technology 1995, 29:321-329.
8. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Paatero P., Edgerton E.S. Incorporation of parametric factors into multilinear receptor model studies of Atlanta aerosol. Atmospheric Environment 2003, 37:5009-5021.
9. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Edgerton E.S. Source identification of Atlanta aerosol by positive matrix factorization. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 2003, 53:731-739.
10. Kim E., Hopke P.K. Comparison between conditional probability function and nonparametric regression for fine particle source directions. Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38:4667-4673.
11. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Qin Y. Estimation of organic carbon blank values and error structures of the speciation trends network data for source apportionments. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 2005, 55:1190-1199.
12. Kim E., Hopke P.K., Kenski D.M., Koerber M. Sources of fine particles in a rural midwestern U.S. area. Environmental Science & Technology 2005, 39(13):4953-4960.
13. Kim E., Hopke P.K. Characterization of fine particle sources in the Great Smoky Mountains area. Science of the Total Environment 2006, 368:781-794.
14. Kim E., Hopke P.K. Source characterization of ambient fine particles in the Los Angeles Basin. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 2007, 6:343-353.
15. Kim E., Hopke P.K. Source identifications of airborne fine particles using PMF2 and EPA PMF. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 2007, 57:811-819.
16. 2.5 aerosol with the Unmix receptor model. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 2001, 53:325-338.
17. Paatero P. Least square formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1997, 37:23-35.
18. Paatero P. The multilinear engine - a table driven, least square program for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor analysis model. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1999, 8(4):854-888.
19. Paatero P., Hopke P.K., Song X.H., Ramadan Z. Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2002, 60:253-264.
20. Paatero P., Hopke P.K. Utilizing wind direction and wind speed as independent variables in multilinear receptor modeling studies. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2002, 60:25-41.
21. Paatero P., Hopke P.K. Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models. Analytica Chimica Acta 2003, 490:277-289.
22. Shah S.D., Cocker D.R., Miller J.W., Norbeck J.M. Emission rates of particulate matter and elemental and organic carbon from in-use diesel engines. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38(9):2544-2550.
23. Song C.H., Carmichael G.R. The aging process of naturally emitted aerosol (sea salt and mineral aerosol) during long-range transport. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:2203-2218.
24. 10) in the Los Angeles Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research 2005, 110(D7):D07S08.
25. Saucy D.A., Anderson J.R., Buseck P.R. Aerosol particle characteristics determined by combined cluster and principal components analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research 1991, 96(D4):7407-7414.
26. 2.5 and gas-phase compounds in Mira Loma, California. Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38:5517-5528.
27. 2.5 during the winter of 1999. Aerosol Science of Technology 2001, 34:88-96.
28. Turpin B.J., Huntzicker J.J., Hering S.V. Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the Los Angeles Basin. Atmospheric Environment 1994, 28:3061-3071.
29. US EPA EPA CMB8.2 User's Manual 2004, EPA/452/R-04/011, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
30. US EPA EPA PMF 1.1 User's Guide 2005, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC.
31. 2.5, and Regional Haze 2007, EPA/454/B-07/002, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
32. US EPA EPA Unmix 6.0 Fundamentals & User Guide 2007, EPA/600/R-07/089, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC.
33. Xie Y., Berkowitz C.M. The use of conditional probability functions and potential source contribution functions to identify source regions and advection pathways of hydrocarbon emissions in Houston, Texas. Atmospheric Environment 2007, 41:5831-5847.
34. Zhou L., Kim E., Hopke P.K., Stanier C., Pandis S.N. Mining airborne particulate size distribution data by positive matrix factorization. Journal of Geophysical Research 2005, 110:D07S18. 10.1029/2004JD005050.