Concordance of commercial data sources for neighborhood-effects studies

Journal of Urban Health

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 713-725

  Hoehner, Christine M ^a   Schootman, Mario ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Built environment; Capture recapture methods; Concordance; Geographic information systems; Neighborhood studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

COMMERCE; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENVIRONMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MISSOURI; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 77954656333     PISSN: 10993460     EISSN: 14682869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-010-9458-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kawachi I, Berkman LF, eds. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
2. Forsyth A, Lytle L, Van Riper D. Finding food: issues and challenges in using geographic information systems (GIS) to measure food access. J Trans Land Use. 2009 (in press).
3. Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(1): 74-81.
4. Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs DR Jr. Associations of the local food environment with diet quality - a comparison of assessments based on surveys and geographic information systems: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(8): 917-924.
5. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(4 Suppl): S99-123 e112.
6. Diez Roux AV, Evenson KR, McGinn AP, et al. Availability of recreational resources and physical activity in adults. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(3): 493-499.
7. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(2): 417-424.
8. Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, et al. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep. 1990; 105: 179-185.
9. Kubzansky LD, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I, Fay ME, Soobader MJ, Berkman LF. Neighborhood contextual influences on depressive symptoms in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(3): 253-260.
10. Subramanian SV, Kubzansky L, Berkman L, Fay M, Kawachi I. Neighborhood effects on the self-rated health of elders: uncovering the relative importance of structural and service-related neighborhood environments. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006; 61 (3): S153-S160.
11. Bader MD, Ailshire JA, Morenoff JD, House JS. Measurement of the local food environment: a comparison of existing data sources. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171(5): 609-617.
12. Boone JE, Gordon-Larsen P, Stewart JD, Popkin BM. Validation of a GIS facilities database: quantification and implications of error. Ann Epidemiol. 2008; 18(5): 371-377.
13. Paquet C, Daniel M, Kestens Y, Leger K, Gauvin L. Field validation of listings of food stores and commercial physical activity establishments from secondary data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 58.
14. Wang MC, Gonzalez AA, Ritchie LD, Winkleby MA. The neighborhood food environment: sources of historical data on retail food stores. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3: 15.
15. Melnick AL, Fleming DW. Modern geographic information systems - promise and pitfalls. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999; 5(2): viii-x.
16. Forsyth A, Schmitz KH, Oakes M, Zimmerman J, Koepp J. Standards for environmental measurement using GIS: toward a protocol for protocols. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3 (Suppl 1): S241-S257.
17. Handy SL, Clifton KJ. Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practices. J Transport Stat. 2001; 4: 67-78.
18. Porter DE, Kirtland KA, Neet MJ, Williams JE, Ainsworth BE. Considerations for using a geographic information system to assess environmental supports for physical activity. Prev Chron Dis. 2004; 1(4): A20.
19. Chao A, Tsay PK, Lin SH, Shau WY, Chao DY. The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data. Stat Med. 2001; 20((20): 3123-3157.
20. Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev. 1995; 17(2): 243-264.
21. Tilling K. Capture-recapture methods - useful or misleading? Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30 (1): 12-14.
22. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting. Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: applications in human diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142(10): 1059-1068.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. American Factfinder. http://factfinder.census.gov. Accessed on: September 29, 2009.
24. ESRI. 2009 Methodology Statement: ESRI data - business locations and business summary. ESRI; 2009.
25. Dun and Bradstreet. The DUNSRight (TM) process: the power behind quality information. http://www.dnb.com/us/about/db-database/dnbinfoquality.html. Accessed on: September 29, 2009.
26. Vernez Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, et al. Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3(Suppl 1): S99-S117.
27. Forsyth A. Environmental and physical activity: GIS protocols. Vol Version 4.1 University of Minnesota and Cornell University; 2007. http://www.designforhealth.net/resources/gis-protocols.html. Accessed on: March 8, 2010.
28. Forsyth A, Oakes M, Schmitz KH, Hearst M. Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud. 2007; 44(4): 679-697.
29. Baker EA, Schootman M, Barnidge E, Kelly C. The role of race and poverty in access to foods that enable individuals to adhere to dietary guidelines. Prev Chron Dis. 2006; 3(3): A76.
30. Zhao F, Gan A, Li S-C. Employment data comparison emphasizes importance of mulitiple data sources. Fla Transp Model. 1999; 12: 2-4.