Social, educational, and occupational predictors of total hip replacement outcome

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1036-1042

  Schafer T ^a   Krummenauer, F ^a,b   Mettelsiefen, J ^a   Kirschner, S ^a   Gunther K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Education; Functional status; Occupation; Outcomes; Social; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMORBIDITY; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; PENSION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EMPLOYMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTERS UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WIDOWER; WORK DISABILITY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954656193     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gignac M., Davis A., Hawker G., Wright J., Mahomed N., Fortin P., et al. What do you expect? You're just getting older": a comparison of perceived osteoarthritis-related and aging-related health experiences in middle- and older-age adults. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:905-912.
2. Grotle M., Hagen K., Natvig B., Dahl F., Kvien T. Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis: results from a population survey in Norway. J Rheumatol 2008, 35:677-684.
3. Roux C., Saraux A., Mazieres B., Pouchot J., Morvan J., Fautrel B., Group KO, et al. Screening for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the general population: predictive value of a questionnaire and prevalence estimates. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:1406-1411.
4. Sun Y., Stürmer T., Günther K., Brenner H. Inzidenz und Prävalenz der Cox- und Gonarthrose in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997, 135:184-192.
5. Lawrence J., Bremner J., Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966, 25:1-24.
6. Statistisches Bundesamt G. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes Bonn. http://www.gbe-bund.de.
7. Montin L., Leino-Kilpi H., Suominen T., Lepistö J. A systematic review of empirical studies between 1966 and 2005 of patient outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and related factors. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17:40-45.
8. Nilsdotter A., Petersson I., Roos E., Lohmander L. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003, 62:923-930.
9. Santaguida P.L.H.G., Hudak P.L., Glazier R., Mahomed N.N., Kreder H.J., Coyte P.C., et al. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2008, 51:428-436.
10. Cleary P., Reilly D., Greenfield S., Mulley A., Wexler L., Frankel F., et al. Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Qual Life Res 1993, 2:3-11.
11. Greenfield S., Apolone G., McNeil B., Cleary P. The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care 1993, 31:141-154.
12. Agabiti N., Picciotto S., Cesaroni G., Bisanti L., Forastiere F., Onorati R., et al. The influence of socioeconomic status on utilization and outcomes of elective total hip replacement: a multicity population-based longitudinal study. Int J Qual Health Care 2007, 19:37-44.
13. Young N., Cheah D., Waddell J., Wright J. Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. Can J Surg 1998, 41:188-195.
14. Bellamy N., Buchanan W., Goldsmith C., Campbell J., Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
15. Stucki G., Meier D., Stucki S., Michel B., Tyndall A., Dick W., et al. Evaluation einer deutschen Version des WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) ArthroseIndex. Z Rheumatol 1996, 55:40-49.
16. Fortin P., Clarke A., Joseph L., Liang M., Tanzer M., Ferland D., et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999, 42:1722-1728.
17. Bischoff-Ferrari H., Lingard E., Losina E., Baron J., Roos E., Phillips C., et al. Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 51:829-835.
18. Nevitt M., Epstein W., Masem M., Murray W. Work disability before and after total hip arthroplasty. Assessment of effectiveness in reducing disability. Arthritis Rheum 1984, 27:410-421.
19. Mobasheri R., Gidwani S., Rosson J. The effect of total hip replacement on the employment status of patients under the age of 60 years. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006, 88:131-133.
20. Jensen J., Mathiesen B., Tvede N. Occupational capacity after hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1985, 56:135-137.
21. Angst F., Aeschlimann A., Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 45:384-391.
22. Ehrich E., Davies G., Watson D., Bolognese J., Seidenberg B., Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2000, 27:2635-2641.
23. Laupacis A., Bourne R., Rorabeck C., Feeny D., Wong C., Tugwell P., et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75:1619-1626.
24. Nilsdotter A., Roos E., Westerlund J., Roos H., Lohmander L. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 45:258-262.
25. Dougados M., Leclaire P., van der Heijde D., Bloch D., Bellamy N., Altman R. Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials response criteria initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000, 8:395-403.
26. Tubach F., Wells G., Ravaud P., Dougados M. Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues. J Rheumatol 2005, 32:2025-2029.
27. Tubach F., Giraudeau B., Ravaud P. The variability in minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state values did not have an impact on treatment effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:725-728.
28. Tubach F., Ravaud P., Baron G., Falissard B., Logeart I., Bellamy N., et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:34-37.
29. Tubach F., Ravaud P., Beaton D., Boers M., Bombardier C., Felson D., et al. Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders. J Rheumatol 2007, 34:1188-1193.