On the combination of domain specific modeling languages

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6138 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 305-320

  Vallecillo, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SYSTEMS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC MODELING LANGUAGES; ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS; MODEL-BASED ENGINEERING; MODEL-DRIVEN TECHNIQUES; SPECIFIC PROBLEMS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 77954651006     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13595-8_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. OMG: Unified Modeling Language 2.1.1 Superstructure Specification. OMG, Needham (MA), USA, OMG doc. formal/07-02-05 (2007)
2. OMG: Systems Modeling Language. OMG, Needham (MA), USA (2008)
3. OMG: UML Profile for MARTE: Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded systems. OMG, Needham (MA), USA (2009)
4. Zito, A., Diskin, Z., Dingel, J.: Package merge in UML 2: Practice vs. theory? In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 185-199. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
5. Bernstein, P.A., Pottinger, R.A.:Merging models based on given correspondences. In: VLDB 2003, Berlin, Germany pp. 862-873 (2003)
6. Barbero, M., Jouault, F., Gray, J., Bézivin, J.: A practical approach to model extension. In: Akehurst, D.H., Vogel, R., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMDA-FA. LNCS, vol. 4530, pp. 32-42. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
7. Emerson, M., Sztipanovits, J.: Techniques for metamodel composition. In: Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Domain Specific Modeling at OOPSLA 2006, pp. 123-139 (2006)
8. Hudak, P.: Building domain-specific embedded languages. ACMComput. Surv. 28(4) (1996)
9. Hofer, C., Ostermann, K., Rendel, T.,Moors, A.: Polymorphic embedding of DSLs. In: Proc. of GPCE 2008, Nashville, TN, pp. 137-148. ACM, New York (2008)
10. Ledeczi, A., Nordstrom, G., Karsai, G., Volgyesi, P.,Maroti,M.: On metamodel composition. In: Proc. of CCA 2001, pp. 756-760 (2001)
11. Estublier, J., Vega, G., Ionita, A.D.: Composing domain-specific languages for wide-scope software engineering applications. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 69-83. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
12. Didonet Del Fabro, M., Jouault, F.: Model transformation and weaving in the AMMA platform. In: GTTSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 4143, pp. 71-77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
13. Bézivin, J., Bouzitouna, S., Didonet Del Fabro, M., Gervais, M.P., Jouault, F., Kolovos, D., Kurtev, I., Paige, R.F.: A canonical scheme for model composition. In: Rensink, A.,Warmer, J. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4066, pp. 346-360. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
14. White, J., et al.: Improving domain-specific language reuse with software product line techniques. IEEE Software 26(4), 47-53 (2009)
15. Bowman, H., Steen,M., Boiten, E.A., Derrick, J.: A formal framework for viewpoint consistency. Formal Methods in System Design 21(2), 111-166 (2002)
16. Linington, P.: Black Cats and Coloured Birds What do Viewpoint Correspondences Do? In: Proc. of WODPEC 2007, Maryland, USA (2007)
17. Clark, T., Sammut, P.,Willans, J.: Applied Metamodelling, 2nd edn., Ceteva (2004)
18. Romero, J.R., Jaén, J.I., Vallecillo, A.: Realizing correspondences in multi-viewpoint specifications. In: Proc. of EDOC 2009, Auckland, NZ, pp. 163-172. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)
19. ISO/IEC: Information technology - Open distributed processing - Use of UML for ODP system specifications. ISO and ITU-T, ISO/IEC IS 19793, ITU-T X.906 (2008)
20. Pedro, L., Risoldi, M., Buchs, D., Barroca, B., Amaral, V.: Composing visual syntax for domain specific languages. In: Proc. of HCI 2009, San Diego, CA. LNCS, vol. 5611, pp. 889-898. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
21. D'Souza, D.F., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML. In: The Catalysis Approach, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
22. Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8, 231-274 (1987)
23. ITU-T Recommendation Z.120: Message Sequence Charts (1994)
24. Groenewegen, D.M., Hemel, Z., Kats, L.C.L., Visser, E.:WebDSL: A Domain-Specific Language for Dynamic Web Applications. In: Mielke, N., Zimmermann, O. (eds.) Companion to OOPSLA 2008, pp. 779-780. ACM, New York (2008), http://webdsl.org
25. Espinoza, H., Cancila, D., Selic, B., Gérard, S.: A practical approach to model extension. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 98-113. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
26. Moreno, N., Fraternali, P., Vallecillo, A.: WebML Modelling in UML. IET Software 1(3), 67-80 (2007)
27. Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In: Proc. of PODS 2002, pp. 233-246 (2002)
28. ISO/IEC: RM-ODP. Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing. ISO and ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO/IEC 10746, ITU-T Rec. X.901-X.904 (1997)
29. Atkinson, C., Stoll, D.: Orthographic modeling environment. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 93-96. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
30. Abouzahra, A., Bézivin, J., Didonet Del Fabro, M., Jouault, F.: A practical approach to bridging domain specific languages with UML profiles. In: Best Practices for Model Driven Software Development Workshop at OOPSLA (2005)
31. Bézivin, J., Hillairet, G., Jouault, F., Kurtev, I., Piers,W.: Bridging theMS/DSL tools and the Eclipse modeling framework. In: Proc. of the International Workshop on Software Factories at OOPSLA (2005)
32. Wimmer, M., Schauerhuber, A., Strommer, M., Schwinger, W., Kappel, G.: A semiautomatic approach for bridging DSLs with UML. In: Proc. of 7th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling at OOPSLA (2007)
33. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., Tisi, M.: A transformation framework to bridge Domain Specific Languages to MDA. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (ed.) Models in Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 5421, pp. 167-180. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
34. Chen, K.: et al.: Semantic anchoring with model transformations. In: Hartman, A., Kreische, D. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3748, pp. 115-129. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
35. Ruscio, D.D., Jouault, F., Kurtev, I., Bézivin, J., Pierantonio, A.: Extending AMMA for supporting dynamic semantics specifications of DSLs. Technical Report 06.02, Laboratoire d'Informatique de Nantes-Atlantique (LINA), Nantes, France (2006)
36. Doh, K.G., Mosses, P.D.: Composing programming languages by combining actionsemantics modules. Sci. Comput. Program. 47(1), 3-36 (2003)
37. Pedro, L., Amaral, V., Buchs, D.: Foundations for a Domain Specific Modeling Language prototyping environment: A compositional approach. In: Proc. of the DSM workshop at OOPSLA 2008, Nashville, TN, pp. 26-33 (2008)
38. Koch,N.,Knapp,A., Zhang,G.,Baumeister,H.:UML-BasedWeb Engineering:AnApproach Based on Standards. In: Web Engineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 12, pp. 157-191. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)