Family sense-making practices in science center conversations

Science Education

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 478-505

  Zimmerman, Heather Toomey ^a   Reeve, Suzanne ^b   Bell, Philip ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954646660     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20374     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Aikenhead, G.S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
3. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, D., Lucas, K.B., & Ginns, I.S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177-199.
5. Ash, D. (2002). Negotiations of thematic conversations about biology. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 357-400). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Ash, D. (2007). Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in nonschool settings. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 207-226). Routledge.
7. Barman, C.R., Barman, N.S., Cox, M.L., Newhouse, K.B., & Goldston, M.J. (2000). Students' ideas about animals: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 38, 42-47.
8. Bell, P. (2002). Using argument map representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 449-485). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Bell, P., Bricker, L.A., Lee, T.R., Reeve, S., & Zimmerman, H.T. (2006). Understanding the cultural foundations of children's biological knowledge: Insights from everyday cognition research. In S.A. Barab, K.E. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS; pp. 1029-1035). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A.W., & Feder, M.A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
11. Bell, P., Zimmerman, H.T., & Clark, T.H. (2006) Technical report: Recommended fieldwork & analysis equipment for video-based ethnographic research (version 1, March 2006). Retrieved March 10, 2006, from www.life-slc.org.
12. Bransford, J.D., & Schwartz, D.L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(3), 61-100.
13. Bricker, L.A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.
14. Bricker, L.A., & Bell, P. (In preparation). Linguistic markers as evidence of interdiscursive learning in youth talk across encounters.
15. Brickhouse, N., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of a school science identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458.
16. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. A, Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 49-56). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Crowley, K., Callanan, M.A., Tenenbaum, H.R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258-261.
20. Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333-356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. diSessa, A. (2002). Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29-60). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Ellenbogen, K.M. (2002). Museums in family life: An ethnographic case study. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 81-102). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
24. Falk, J.H., & Dierking, L.D. (2000). The museum experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
25. Fine, G.A. (1983) Shared fantasy: Role playing games as social worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Gee, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
27. Gilbert, J., & Priest, M. (1997). Models and discourse: A primary school science class visit to a museum. Science Education, 81(6), 749-762.
28. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
29. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
30. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(1-2), 19-36.
31. Goodwin, M.H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children's arguing. In S.U. Phillips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P. & Tejada, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286-303.
33. Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 19-25.
34. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R.E., & Redish, E.F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
35. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. James, W. (1911). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature (Being the Gifford lectures on natural religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901-1902). London: Longmans, Green & Co.
37. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
38. Keil, F.C. (1992). Origins of an autonomous biology. In M.R. Gunnar & M.P. Maratsos (Eds). Modularity and constraints in language and cognition: Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 103-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Korpan, C.A., Bisanz, G.L., Bisanz, J., Boehme, C., & Lynch, M.A. (1997). What did you learn outside of school today? Using structured interviews to document home and community activities related to science and technology. Science Education, 81(6), 651-662.
40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Lemke, J.L. (2000). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Linn, M.C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 243-264). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284-288.
45. Nasir, N.S., Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Lee, C.D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489-504). New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Science at dinner. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 29-45). Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
47. Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Process, 15, 37-72.
48. Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J.V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.
52. Rose, M. (2004). The mind at work: Valuing the intelligence of the American worker. New York: Penguin.
53. Saxe, G.B. (1996). Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context: The development of a practice-based approach. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R.A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development (pp. 275-303). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Schauble, L., & Bartlett, K. (1997). Constructing a science gallery for children and families: The role of research in an innovative design process. Science Education, 81(6), 781-793.
55. Schwartz, D.L., Bransford, J.D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
56. Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R.J. Sternberg & R.K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57. Silverstein, M. (2005). Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 6-22.
58. Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
59. Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate, 1(6). Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=issue&id=9.
60. Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2007). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In K. Salen (Ed.), Ecology of games: Macarthur Foundation series on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273-286.
62. Tenenbaum, H.R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 34-47.
63. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Tools and symbols in child development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.