Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 17-25

  Rao, Samir S ^a   Parikh, Pranay M ^a   Goldstein, Jesse A ^a   Nahabedian, Maurice Y ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION RESPONSE; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; RISK FACTOR; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED STATES; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECTUS ABDOMINIS; RISK FACTORS; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SURGICAL FLAPS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954644422     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da8812     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: The PROSE study group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055-1062. (Pubitemid 41095038)
2. Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:77-84.
3. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203-5209.
4. Herrinton LJ, Barlow WE, Yu O, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: A cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4275-4286.
5. Vega SJ, Bossert RP, Serletti JM. Improving outcomes in bilateral breast reconstruction using autologous tissue. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:487-490; discussion 491-492.
6. Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ, et al. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1477-1482.
7. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
8. Bajaj AK, Chevray PM, Chang DW. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparingTRAMflap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:737-746; discussion 747-750.
9. Selber JC, Kurichi JE, Vega SJ, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:492-497.
10. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, et al. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: A comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1711-1719; discussion 1720-1721.
11. Tran NV, Buchel EW, Convery PA. Microvascular complications of DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1397-1405; discussion 1406-1408.
12. Debono R, Thompson A, Stevenson JH. Immediate versus delayed free TRAM breast reconstruction: An analysis of perioperative factors and complications. Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55:111-116.
13. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Manson PN. Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:74-82.
14. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83:824-841; discussion 842-844.
15. Nahabedian MY, Dooley W, Singh N, Manson PN. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen following breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: The role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:91-101.
16. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:466-475; discussion 476-477. (Pubitemid 34815947)
17. Blondeel PN. The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap: A valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:185-193.
18. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al. Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98:459-463.
19. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: Is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115:436-444; discussion 445-446.
20. Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121:1519-1526.
21. Lindsey JT. Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: Presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119:18-27.
22. Baumeister S, Follmar KE, Zenn MR, Erdmann D, Levin LS. Strategy for reoperative free flaps after failure of a first flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:962-971.