Pre-college electrical engineering instruction: The impact of abstract vs. Contextualized representation and practice on learning

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 225-235

  Reisslein, Martin ^a   Moreno, Roxana ^a   Ozogul, Gamze ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Practice; Problem representation; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC NETWORK PARAMETERS; GRAPHIC METHODS; SOFTWARE TESTING; STUDENTS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

CIRCUIT DIAGRAMS; ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT; ENGINEERING INSTRUCTIONS; FACTORIAL DESIGN; INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS; PRACTICE; PROBLEM REPRESENTATION; REAL-LIFE CONTEXTS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 77954637438     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01058.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aiken L.R. 1997. Psychological testing and assessment. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Allen, K., T. Reed-Rhoads, R.A. Terry, T.J. Murphy, and A.D. Stone. 2008. Coefficient alpha: An engineer's interpretation of test reliability. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (1): 87-94.
3. Alexander, C.K., and M. Sadiku. 2004. Fundamentals of electric circuits. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
4. Brown, J.S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32-42.
5. Butcher, R.K. 2006. Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (1): 182-197
6. Case, J., and D. Marshall. 2004. Between deep and surface: Procedural approaches to learning in engineering education contexts. Studies in Higher Education 29 (5): 605-615
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. 1993. Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology 33 (3): 52-70.
8. Cordova, D.I., and M.R. Lepper. 1996. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (4): 715-730
9. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16 (3): 297-334.
10. Dwyer, F.M. 1968. The effectiveness of visual illustrations used to complement programmed instruction. Journal of Psychology 70 (2): 157-162
11. Dwyer, F.M. 1969. The effect of varying the amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction. Programmed Learning 6 (3): 147-153
12. Elia, I., A. Gagatsis, and A. Demetriou. 2007. The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one-step additive problems. Learning and Instruction 17 (6): 658-672
13. Goldstone R.L., and Y. Sakamoto. 2003. The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology 46 (4): 414-466
14. Goldstone, R.L., and J.Y. Son. 2005. The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (1): 69-110.
15. Harp, S.F., and R.E. Mayer. 1998. How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (3): 414-434
16. Hegarty, M., P.A. Carpenter, and M.A. Just.1991. Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In Handbook of reading research 2, eds. R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, and P.D. Pearson, 641-668. New York: Longman.
17. Holliday, G.W., L.L. Brunner, and E.L. Donais. 1977. Differential cognitive and adaptive responses to flow diagrams in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 14 (2): 129-138
18. Irwin, D., and M.R. Nelms. 2005. Basic engineering circuit analysis. 8th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.z
19. Joseph, J.H., and F.M. Dwyer. 1984. Effects of prior knowledge, presentation mode, and visual realism on student achievement. Journal of Experimental Education 52 (2): 110-121
20. Kaminski, J.A., V.M. Sloutsky, and A.F. Heckler. 2008. The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science 320 (5875): 454-455
21. Koedinger, K.R., and M.J. Nathan. 2004. The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (2): 129-164
22. Koedinger, K.R, M.W. Alibali, and M.J. Nathan. 2008. Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problems. Cognitive Science 32 (2): 366-397
23. Mayer, R.E., J. Heiser, and S. Lonn. 2001. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (1): 187-198
24. Meece, J.L. 2002. Child and adolescent development for educators, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Miller, P. 2002. Theories of developmental psychology, 4th ed., New York: Worth Publishers.
26. Moreno, R. 2007. Optimizing learning from animations by minimizing cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (6): 765-781
27. Moreno, R., and R.E. Mayer. 2000. A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 117-125
28. Moreno, R., M. Reisslein, and G.M. Delgoda. 2006. Toward a fundamental understanding of worked example instruction: impact of meansends practice, backward/forward fading, and adaptivity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA.
29. Moreno, R., M. Reisslein, and G. Ozogul. 2009a. Optimizing workedexample instruction in electrical engineering: the role of fading and feedback during problem-solving practice. Journal of Engineering Education 98 (1): 83-92.
30. Moreno, R., M. Reisslein, and G. Ozogul. 2009b. Pre-college electrical engineering instruction: Do abstract or contextualized representations promote better learning? In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Antonio, TX.
31. Nathan, M.J., W. Kintsch, and E. Young. 1992. A theory of algebra word problem comprehension and its implications for the design of computer learning environments. Cognition and Instruction 9 (4): 329-389
32. Newell, A., and P. Rosenbloom. 1981. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In Cognitive skills and their acquisition, ed. J.R. Anderson, 1-55. Mahaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Orsak, G.C. 2003. Guest editorial: K-12: engineering's new frontier. IEEE Transactions on Education 46 (2): 209-210
34. Orsak, G.C., S.L. Wood, S.C. Douglas, D.C. Munson, J.R. Treichler, Jr., R. Athale, and M.A. Yoder. 2004. Engineering our digital future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Paas, F.G.W.C., and J.G. Van Merrienboer. 1994. Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometric problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (1): 122-133
36. Peladeau, N., J. Forget, and F. Gagne. 2003. Effect of paced and unpaced practice on skill application and retention: How much is enough? American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 769-801.
37. Petre, M., and T.R.G. Green. 1993. Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 4 (1): 55-70.
38. Presmeg, N.C. 1986. Visualisation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics 6 (3): 42-46.
39. Quilici J.L., and R.E. Mayer. 1996. Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1): 144-161
40. Scheiter, K., P. Gerjets, T. Huk, B. Imhof, and Y. Kammerer. 2009. The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction 19 (6): 481-494
41. Schnackenberg, H.L., H.J. Sullivan, L.F. Leader, and E.E.K. Jones. 1998. Learner preferences and achievement under differing amounts of learner practice. Educational Technology Research & Development 46 (2): 5-15.
42. Schwartz, D.L., and J.B. Black. 1996. Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science 20 (4): 457-497
43. Sloutsky, V.M., J.A. Kaminski, and A.F. Heckler. 2005. The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (3): 508-513
44. Shute, V.J., L.A. Gawlick, and K.A. Gluck. 1998. Effects of practice and learner control on short- and long-term gain and efficiency. Human Factors 40 (2): 296-310.
45. Symonds, P.M., and D.H. Chase. 1929. Practice vs. motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 20 (1): 19-35.
46. Tulving, E., and S. Osler. 1968. Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4): 593-601.
47. Winn, W. 1988. Recall of the pattern, sequence, and names of concepts presented in instructional diagrams. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25 (5): 375-386