Psychometric evaluation of the post-discharge surgical recovery scale

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 794-801

  Berg, Katarina ^a   Idvall, Ewa ^a,b   Nilsson, Ulrica ^c   Arestedt, Kristoferf Franzén ^a,d   Unosson, Mitra ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Vastervik Hospital   (Sweden)

^c ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

day surgery; postoperative period; psychometrics; questionnaire; recovery; validation study

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 77954627472     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01197.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. De Lathouwer, C. Poullier, J. P. (2000) How much ambulatory surgery in the world in 1996-1997 and trends? Ambulatory Surgery, 8, 191 210.
2. Young, J., O'Connell, B. McGregor, S. (2000) Day surgery patients' convalescence at home: does enhanced discharge education make a difference? Nursing and Health Sciences 2 (1 29 39.
3. Fleisher, L., Pasternak, L., Herbert, R. Anderson, G. (2004) Inpatient hospital admission and death after outpatient surgery in elderly patients. Archives of Surgery, 139 (1 67 72.
4. Horvath, K. J. (2003) Postoperative recovery at home after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 18 (5 324 334.
5. Schnaider, I. Chung, F. (2006) Outcomes in day surgery. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 19 (6 622 929.
6. Chung, F. Mezei, G. (1999) Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 89 (6 1352 1359.
7. Fortier, J., Chung, F. Su, J. (1998) Unanticipated admissions after ambulatory surgery - a prospective study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 45 (7 612 619.
8. Rhodes, L., Miles, G. Pearson, A. (2006) Patient subjective experience and satisfaction during the perioperative period in the day surgery setting: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12, 178 192.
9. Yellen, E. Davis, G. (2001) Patient satisfaction in ambulatory surgery. AORN Journal, 74 (4 483 498.
10. Myles, P. S., Weitkamp, K., Jones, K., Melick, J. Hensen, S. (2000) Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84 (1 11 15.
11. Allvin, R., Berg, K., Idvall, E. Nilsson, U. (2007) Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57 (5 552 558.
12. Kleinbeck, S. (2000) Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 461 472.
13. Lee, J. Stephens, R. (2000) Recovery from surgery: grappling with an elusive concept. Hospital Medicine, 61 (3 189 192.
14. Wu, C. Richman, J. M. (2004) Postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 17 (5 455 460.
15. Kluivers, K., Riphagen, I., Vierhout, M., Brölmann, H. de Vet, H. (2008) Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery, 143, 206 215.
16. Kirchner, B. Guyatt, G. (1985) A methodological framework for assessment of health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38 (1 27 36.
17. Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Katz, J. Wright, J. (2001) A taxonomy for responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1204 1217.
18. Cha, E.-S., Kim, K. Erlen, J. (2007) Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58 (4 386 395.
19. Marley, R. (2005) Preoperative evaluation and preparation of the patient. In Nurse Anesthesia (eds J. Nagelhout K. Zaglaniczny pp. 332 372.
20. Terwee, C., Bot, S., de Boer, M., van der Windt, D., Knol, D., Dekker, J., Bouter, M. de Vet, H. (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 34 42.
21. Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
22. Nunnally, J. C. Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric Theory, 3rd Edn.
23. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R. Sullivan, J. J. (2003) Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research.
24. Gorsuch, R. (1983) Factor Analysis, 2nd Edn.
25. Husted, J., Cook, R., Farewell, V. Gladman, D. (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 459 568.
26. Fayers, P. Machin, D. (2007) Quality of Life. The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-recorded Outcomes, 2nd Edn.
27. Crosby, R., Kolotkin, R. Williams, G. (2003) Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 395 407.
28. de Vet, H., Bouter, L., Bezemer, P. Beurskens, A. (2001) Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 17 (4 479 487.
29. Stratford, P., Binkley, J., Riddle, D. Guyatt, G. (1998) Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1. Physical Therapy, 78 (11 1186 1196. (Pubitemid 28507242)
30. Deyo, R. Centor, R. (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39 (11 897 906.
31. Ferketich, S. (1991) Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 165 168.
32. Munro, B. Page, E. (1997) Statistical Methods for Health Care Research, 3rd Edn.
33. Terwee, C., Dekker, F., Wiersinga, W., Prummel, M. Bossuyt, P. (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349 362.
34. Beaton, D. (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine, 25 (24 3192 3199.