Results of an international ring test with the dung fly Musca autumnalis in support of a new OECD test guideline

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 408, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 4102-4106

  Römbke, Jörg ^a   Barrett, Katie ^b   Blanckenhorn, Wolf U ^c   Hargreaves, Tom ^d   Kadiri, Nassera ^f   Knäbe, Silvio ^e   Lehmhus, Jörn ^h   Lumaret, Jean Pierre ^f   Rosenkranz, Boris ^g   Scheffczyk, Adam ^a   Sekine, Tatsuya ^g  

^a ECT OEKOTOXIKOLOGIE GMBH   (Germany)

^b HUNTINGDON LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

^e Eurofins Medinet Inc   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PAUL VALÉRY   (France)

^g Institut für Biologische Analytik und Consulting   (Germany)

^h INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anthelmintics; Insect; Ivermectin; Laboratory test; Standardization; Veterinary pharmaceuticals

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT TIME; DIPTERA; EFFECT CONCENTRATION; GERMANY; INSECT; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY; IVERMECTIN; LABORATORY TEST; LETHAL AND SUBLETHAL TOXICITY; NO-OBSERVED-EFFECT-CONCENTRATIONS; RING TEST; STANDARD DEVIATION; TEST ORGANISMS; TEST RESULTS; VETERINARY PHARMACEUTICALS;

AGRICULTURE; BIOASSAY; DRUG PRODUCTS; LABORATORIES; STANDARDIZATION; TOXICITY;

TESTING;

IVERMECTIN; PESTICIDE RESIDUE;

BIOASSAY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DRUG; FLY; GUIDELINE; IVERMECTIN; LABORATORY METHOD; OECD; STANDARDIZATION; SUBLETHAL EFFECT; TOXICITY TEST;

ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLY; INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY; MUSCA AUTUMNALIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TOXICITY TESTING; VALIDITY;

ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FECES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; INSECTICIDES; IVERMECTIN; MUSCIDAE; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; TOXICITY TESTS;

FRANCE; GERMANY;

DIPTERA; HEXAPODA; MUSCA AUTUMNALIS; MUSCIDAE; SCATHOPHAGIDAE;

EID: 77954622726     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.027     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blume R.R. A checklist, distributional record, and annotated bibliography of the insects associated with bovine droppings of pastures in America north of Mexico. Southwest Entomol Suppl 1985, 9:1-54.
2. Fernandez C., San Andrés M., Porcel M.A., Rodriguez C., Alonso Á., Tarazona J.V. Pharmacokinetic profile of ivermectin in cattle dung excretion, and its associated environmental hazard. Soil Sediment Contam 2009, 18:564-575.
3. Floate K.D. Off-target effects of ivermectin on insects and on dung degradation in southern Alberta, Canada. Bull Entomol Res 1998, 88:25-35.
4. Floate K.D., Fox A.S. Indirect effects of ivermectin residues across trophic levels: Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) and Muscidifurax zaraptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Bull Entomol Res 1999, 89:225-229.
5. Floate K.D., Wardhaugh K.G., Boxall A.B.A., Sherratt T.N. Faecal residues of veterinary pharmaceuticals: non-target effects in the pasture environment. Ann Rev Entomol 2005, 50:153-179.
6. Floate K.D., Bouchard P., Holroyd G.L., Poulin R.G., Wellicome T.I. Does doramectin use on cattle indirectly affect the endangered Burrowing Owl. Rangeland Ecol Manage 2008, 61:543-553.
7. Herd R.P., Sams R.A., Ashcroft S.M. Persistence of ivermectin in plasma and faeces following treatment of cows with ivermectin sustained-release, pour-on or injectable formulations. Int Parasitol 1996, 36:1087-1093.
8. Kolar L., Kožuh Eržen N. Veterinary parasiticides-are they posing an environmental risk?. Slov Vet Res 2006, 43:85-96.
9. Krafsur E.S., Moon R.D. Bionomics of the face fly, Musca autumnalis. Ann Rev Entomol 1997, 42:503-523.
10. Kruger K., Scholtz C.H. The effect of ivermectin on the development and reproduction of the dung-breeding fly Musca nevilli (Diptera, Muscidae). Agric Ecosyst Environ 1995, 53:13-18.
11. Madsen M., Nielson B.O., Holter P., Pedersen O.C., Jespersen J.B., Vagn Jensen K.M., et al. Treating cattle with ivermectin: effects on the fauna and decomposition of dung pats. J Appl Ecol 1990, 27:1-15.
12. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). OECD Guidelines for the testing of Chemicals. Sediment-Water Chironomid Toxicity Test Using Spiked Sediment. No. 218. Paris, France; 2004a.
13. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Determination of developmental toxicity of a test chemical to dipteran dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae), Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae)). Ring test Draft. Paris, France; 2004b.
14. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 34, Paris, France; 2005.
15. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Determination of Developmental Toxicity of a Test chemical to Dipteran Dung Flies (Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae), Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae)). No. 228. Paris, France; 2008.
16. Römbke J., Floate K.D., Jochmann R., Schäfer M.A., Puniamoorthy N., Knäbe S., et al. Lethal and sublethal toxic effects of a test chemical (ivermectin) on the Yellow Dung Fly Scathophaga stercoraria based on a standardized international ring test. Environ Toxicol Chem 2009, 28:2117-2124.
17. Schmuck R., Candolfi M.P., Kleiner R., Mead-Briggs M., Moll M., Kemmeter F., et al. A laboratory test system for assessing effects of plant protection products on the plant dwelling insect Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Guidelines to evaluate side-effects of plant protection products to non-target arthropods. IOBC, BART and EPPO Joint Initiative 2000, 45-56. IOBC/WPRS, Gent, Belgium. M.P. Candolfi, S. Blümel, R. Forster, F.M. Bakker, C. Grimm, S.A. Hassan, U. Heimbach, M.A. Mead-Briggs, B. Reber, R. Schmuck, H. Vogt (Eds.).
18. Sommer C., Steffansen B., Overgaard Nielsen B., Gronvold J., Vagn Jensen K.M., Brochner Jespersen J., et al. Ivermectin excreted in cattle dung after subcutaneous injection or pour-on treatment: concentrations and impact on dung fauna. Bull Entomol Res 1992, 82:257-264.
19. Suarez V.H., Lifschitz A.L., Sallovitz J.M., Lanusse C.E. Effects of ivermectin and doramectin faecal residues on the invertebrate colonization of cattle dung. J Appl Entomol 2003, 127:481-488.
20. ®. Software for the statistical analysis of biotests 2003, ToxRat Solutions GmbH, Alsdorf, Germany.
21. VICH (International Cooperation on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Veterinary Medicinal Products). Environmental impact assessment for veterinary medicinal products-Phase II. Guidance. VICH GL 38. London, UK; 2004.
22. Wardhaugh K.G., Holter P., Whitby W.A., Shelley K. Effects of drug residues in the faeces of cattle treated with injectable formulations of ivermectin and moxidectin on larvae of the bush fly, Musca vetustissima, and the house fly, Musca domestica. Aust Vet J 1996, 74:370-374.
23. Webb J.D., Burg J.G., Knapp F.W. Moxidectin evaluation against Solenoptes capillatus (Anoplura: Linognathidae), Bovicola bovis (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae), and Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae) on cattle. J Econ Entomol 1991, 84:1266-1269.