Numerical simulation of flow-induced noise using LES/SAS and Lighthill's acoustic analogy

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 63, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1103-1122

  Kaltenbacher, M ^a   Escobar, M ^b   Becker, S ^b   Ali, I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Finite element method; Finite volume method; Incompressible flow; Subsonic; Turbulence models

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC ANALOGY; ACOUSTIC ENERGY; ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION; ADAPTIVE SIMULATION; ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; CO-ROTATING VORTICES; COMPUTATIONAL DOMAINS; FE FORMULATION; FE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATIONS; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; HYBRID APPROACH; HYBRID COMPUTATION; INDUCED NOISE; NEAR FIELDS; NODAL LOADS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER TECHNIQUES; SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL; SUBSONIC; VARIATIONAL FORMULATION;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; ACOUSTIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW SIMULATION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHODS; TURBULENCE MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW; VORTEX FLOW; WAVE EQUATIONS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77954616469     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2123     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Hardin JC, Hussaini MY (eds). Computational aeroacoustics for low Mach number flows. Computational Aeroacoustics. Springer: New York, 1992; 50-68.
2. Hardin JC, Hussaini MY (eds). Regarding numerical considerations for computational aeroacoustics. Computational Aeroacoustics. Springer: New York, 1992; 216-228.
3. Freund JB, Lele SK, Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of a Mach 1.92 turbulent jet and its sound field. AIAA Journal 2000; 38:2023-2031.
4. Uzun A, Lyrintzis AS, Blaisdell GA. Coupling of integral acoustics methods with LES for jet noise prediction. Proceedings of AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2004-0517, Reno, NV, U.S.A., 2004.
5. Goldstein ME. Aeroacoustics. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1976.
6. Lighthill MJ. On sound generated aerodynamically: I. General theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1952; 211:564-587.
7. Curle N. The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1955; A231:505-514.
8. Ffowcs-Williams J, Hawkings D. Sound radiation from turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society 1969; 2111:321-342.
9. Brentner K, Farassat F. An analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. AIAA Journal 1998; 36(8):1379-1386.
10. Farassat F. Acoustic radiation from rotating blades-the Kirchhoff method in aeroacoustics. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2001; 239(4):785-800.
11. Di Francescantonio P. A new boundary integral formulation for the prediction of sound radiation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1997; 202(4):491-509.
12. Lyrintzis AS. Surface integral methods in computational aeroacoustics-from the (CFD) near field to the (Acoustic) far-field. International Journal of Aeroacoustics 2003; 2(2):95-128.
13. Lockard D. A comparison of Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings solvers for airframe applications. Proceedings of 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Breckenridge, U.S.A., 2002.
14. Farassat F, Myers MK. Extension of Kirchhoff's formula to radiation from moving surfaces. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1988; 123:451-560.
15. Oberai A, Ronaldkin F, Hughes T. Computational procedures for determining structural-acoustic response due to hydrodynamic sources. Computer Methods in Applied and Mechanical Engineering 2000; 190:345-361.
16. Bogey C, Bailly C, Juvé D. Computation of flow noise using source terms in linearized Euler's equations. AIAA Journal 2002; 40(2):235-243.
17. Hardin JC, Pope DS. An acoustic/viscous splitting technique for computational aeroacoustics. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 1994; 6:323-340.
18. Manoha E, Herrero C, Sagaut P, Redonnet S. Numerical prediction of airfoil aerodynamic noise. Proceedings of 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Breckenridge, U.S.A., 2002.
19. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107(2):262-281.
20. Roeck WD. Hybrid methodologies for computational aeroacoustic analysis of confined, subsonic flows. Ph.D. Thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, 2007.
21. Farshchi M, Hannani S, Ebrahimi M. Lineraized and non-linear acoustic/viscous splitting techniques for low mach number flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 42:1059-1072.
22. Ewert R, Schröder W. Acoustic perturbation equations based on flow decomposition via source filtering. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 188:365-398.
23. Seo J, Moon Y. Linearized perturbed compressible equations for low Mach number aeroacoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 218(2):702-719.
24. Oberai A, Ronaldkin F, Hughes T. Computation of trailing-edge noise due to turbulent flow over an airfoil. AIAA Aeroacoustics Journal 2002; 40:2206-2216.
25. Ali I, Vaik I, Escobar M, Kaltenbacher M, Paal G, Becker S. Coupled flow and acoustic simulation in the case of an edge tone configuration and a square cylinder. 13th International Conference on Fluid Flow Technology, Budapest, Hungary, 2006.
26. Becker S, Hahn C, Kaltenbacher M, Lerch R. Flow-induced sound of wall-mounted cylinders with different geometries. AIAA Journal 2008; 46(9):2265-2281.
27. Müller EA, Obermeier F. The spinning vortices as a source of sound. Fluids Dynamics of Rotor and Fan Supported Aircraft at Subsonic Speeds 1967; 22:1-8.
28. Durst F, Schäfer M. A parallel block-structured multigrid method for the prediction of incompressible flows. Internmational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1996; 22:549-565.
29. Perić M. A finite volume method for the prediction of three-dimensional fluid flow in complex ducts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1985.
30. Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review 1963; 91(3):99-164.
31. van Driest ER. On turbulent flow near a wall. Journal for Aeronautical Sciences 1956; 23(11):1007-1011.
32. Rodi W, Ferziger JH, Breuer M, Pourquiee M. Status of large eddy simulation: results of a workshop. Journal of Fluids Engineering 1997; 119:248-262.
33. Breuer M. Direkte Numerische Simulation und Large-Eddy Simulation turbulenter Strömungen auf Hochleistungsrechnern (Direct Numerical Simulation and Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows on High Performance Computers). Shaker Verlag, 2002; 1-431. ISBN 3-8265-9958-6.
34. Adams R. Sobolev Spaces. Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press: New York, 1975.
35. nd edn). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2007.
36. Berenger J. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 114:185-200.
37. Collino F, Monk P. The perfectly matched layer in curvilinear coordinates. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1998; 19:2061-2090.
38. Harari I, Slavutin M, Turkel E. Analytical and numerical studies of a finite element pml for the Helmholtz equation. Journal of Computational Acoustics 2000; 8:121-127.
39. Hu FQ. Absorbing boundary conditions. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004; 18: 513-522.
40. Singer I, Turkel E. A perfectly matched layer for Helmholz equation in a semi-infinite strip. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 201:439-465.
41. Teixeira F, Chew W. Complex space approach to perfect layers: a review and some developments. International Journal of Numerical Modelling 2000; 13:441-455.
42. Lee DJ, Koo SO. Numerical study of sound generation due to a spinning vortex pair. AIAA Journal 1995; 33:20-26.
43. Powell A. Theory of vortex sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1964; 36:177-195.
44. Ekaterinaris J. New formulation of Hardin-Pope equations for aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 1999; 37:1033-1039.
45. Dumbser M. Arbitrary high order schemes for the solution of hyperbolic conservation laws in complex domains. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Aerospatial Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2005.
46. Schram C, Anthoine J, Hirschberg A. Calculation of sound scattering using Curle's analogy for non-compact bodies. The 11th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, 2005-2836, Monterey, U.S.A., 2005.
47. CFX. ANSYS-CFX software. Available at: www.ansys.com/cfx/.
48. Menter FR, Egorov Y. SAS turbulence modelling of technical flows. Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation VI. Springer: Netherlands, 2006.
49. Escobar M. Finite element simulation of flow-induced noise using Lighthill's acoustic analogy. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg, 2007.