An ontology-based tool for the correspondences between specialist and consumer medical lexicons for the geriatrics domain

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 156, Issue , 2010, Pages 128-137

  Bonacina, Stefano ^a   Pinciroli, Francesco ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

communication between caregivers and patients; databases; Prot g ; Terminology and ontology challenges

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; GERIATRICS; HEALTH CARE;

CONSUMER APPLICATIONS; HEALTH INFORMATIONS; HEALTHCARE PROCESS; MEDICAL CONCEPTS; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; PERSONALIZED HEALTHCARE; TAXONOMIC STRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77954589755     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-565-5-128     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Mandl KD, Simons WW, Crawford WC, Abbett JM. Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007;7:25.
2. Kupchunas WR. Personal health record: new opportunity for patient education. Orthopedic nursing / National Association of Orthopedic Nurses 2007;26(3):185-91.
3. Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15(1):1-7. (Pubitemid 350216488)
4. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, Shinstrom SE, Stolyar A, Kim EH, Kim Y. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. In: Proc AMIA Symp; 2006. Washington (DC); 2006. p. 514-8.
5. Kim EH, Stolyar A, Lober WB, Herbaugh AL, Shinstrom SE, Zierler BK, Soh CB, Kim Y. Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(4):e44.
6. Institute of medicine. Health Literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2004.
7. Kripalani S, Robertson R, Love-Ghaffari MH, Henderson LE, Praska J, Strawder A, Katz MG, Jacobson TA. Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66(3):368-77.
8. Zeng QT, Tse T, Divita G, Keselman A, Crowell J, Browne AC, Goryachev S, Ngo L. Term identification methods for consumer health vocabulary development. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(1):e4. (Pubitemid 47450404)
9. Object Management Group. The Unified Modeling Language™ Specifications. UML web site. [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.uml.org/. 1997.
10. Bodenreider O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Database issue):D267-70.
11. Zielstorff RD. Controlled vocabularies for consumer health. J Biomed Inform 2003;36(4-5):326-33.
12. The Consumer Health vocabulary initiative. [Online]. Available from: URL: http://www.consumerhealthvocab.org/
13. Gould M. Anyone here a doctor who speaks nurse? Health Serv J 2008;Jun:22-4.
14. Carthey J. Involving and communicating with patients and the public. Nurs Stand 2006;20(17):50-3.
15. Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition (Special issue: Current issues in knowledge modelling) 1993;5(2):199-220.
16. Protégé Ontology Editor. [Online]. Available from: URL: http://protege.stanford.edu/.
17. Schulz S, Hahn U. Towards the ontological foundations of symbolic biological theories. Artif Intell Med 2007;39(3):237-50.
18. Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C, Colella KM, Schoor RA, Shih L, Kuzel TM, Nadler RB, Bennett CL. Health literacy and shared decision making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Invest 2001;19(7):684-91.
19. Cutilli CC. Health literacy in geriatric patients: An integrative review of the literature. Orthop Nurs 2007;26(1):43-8.
20. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e22.
21. Shaw A, Ibrahim S, Reid F, Ussher M, Rowlands G. Patients' perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels. Patient Educ Couns 2009;75(1):114-20.
22. Shamsfard M, Barforoush AA. Learning ontologies from natural language texts. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2004;60:17-63.
23. Brewster C, Jupp S, Luciano J, Shotton D, Stevens RD, Zhang Z. Issues in learning an ontology from text. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10(Suppl 5):S1.
24. Bonacina S, Pinciroli F. Experiments of characterizations of the family medical lexicon for telehomecare applications, In: M.H. Hamza, editor. Proceedings of the Second IASTED International Symposium on TELEHEALTH and ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (TAT 2009); 2009 Nov 2-4; Cambridge (MA): ISBN 978-0-88986-815-1. Calgary (Canada): ACTA Press; 2009. p. 103-10.
25. Bonacina S, Pinciroli F. Architectural Pros and Cons for Building Family Medical Ontology, In: M.H. Hamza, editor. Proceedings of the Second IASTED International Symposium on TELEHEALTH and ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (TAT 2009); 2009 Nov 2-4; Cambridge (MA): ISBN 978-0-88986-815-1. Calgary (Canada): ACTA Press; 2009. p. 21-30.
26. Alpay L, Russell A. Information technology training in primary care: the nurses' voice. Comput Inform Nurs 2002;20(4):136-42.
27. Stepánková O, Engová D. Professional competence and computer literacy in e-age, focus on healthcare, Methods Inf Med 2006;45(3):300-4.
28. Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J. The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Info Libr J 2008;25(2):81-97. (Pubitemid 351725016)
29. Smedley A, The importance of informatics competencies in nursing: an Australian perspective. Comput Inform Nurs 2005;23(2):106-110. (Pubitemid 40522582)