Aligning software configuration management with governance structures

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-8

  Pala Er, Nagehan ^a   Erbaş, Cengiz ^a  

^a ASELSAN INC   (Turkey)

Author keywords

reusability; software configuration management; software development governance; tools integration; transaction cost economics

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES; IMPLEMENTABILITY; MINIMIZING COSTS; PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS; PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS; SHARED COMPONENTS; SOFTWARE ASSETS; SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE; SOFTWARE INDUSTRY; TOOLSETS; TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; REUSABILITY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77954577561     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1808981.1808982     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bannerman, P.L. 2009. Software Development Governance: A Meta-Management Perspective. Software Development Governance Workshop (Vancouver, Canada, May 17, 2009). ICSE'09. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SDG.2009.5071329
2. Bellagio, D. E., and Milligan, T. J. 2005. Software Configuration Management Strategies and IBM® Rational® ClearCase® Second Edition A Practical Introduction. Addison Wesley Professional (May 2005).
3. Berczuk, S. P., and Appleton, B. 2002. Software Configuration Management Patterns: Effective Teamwork, Practical Integration. Addison Wesley (Nov. 2002).
4. nd Workshop on Software Development Governance, Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, (Vancouver, Canada). ICSE'09. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSE- COMPANION.2009.5071059
5. Erbas, B.C., and Erbas, C. 2005. A Transaction Cost Economics Approach to Software Development and Acquisition. Integrated Design and Process Technology Conference (San Diego, California, June 2005).
6. Erbas, C., and Erbas, B.C. 2009. Software Development under Bounded Rationality and Opportunism. Software Development Governance Workshop (Vancouver, Canada, May 17, 2009). ICSE'09. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SDG. 2009.5071331
7. Estublier, J., Leblang, D., Van de Hoek, A., Conradi, R., Clemm G., Tichy, W., and Wiborg-Weber, D. 2005. Impact of Software Engineering Research on the Practice of Software Configuration Management, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 14(4), pp.1-48. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 1101815.1101817
8. IBM Rational ClearCase Introduction, http://www- 01.ibm.com/support/ docview.wss?rs=984&uid=pub1gi11636 000.
9. IBM Rational Rhapsody, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/ products/rhaps ody/?S-TACT=105AGX15.
10. Kofman, A., Yaeli, A., Klinger, T., and Tarr, P. 2009. Roles, Rights and Responsibilities: Better Governance through Decision Rights Automation. Software Development Governance Workshop (Vancouver, Canada, May 17, 2009). ICSE'09. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SDG.2009.5071330
11. Kreps, D.M. 1990. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton University Press (New Jersey).
12. Walrad, C., and Strom, D. 2002. The Importance of Branching Models in SCM, IEEE Computer, 35(9): pp. 31- 38. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.2002. 1033025