Doubled volatile organic compound emissions from subarctic tundra under simulated climate warming

New Phytologist

Volumn 187, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 199-208

  Faubert, Patrick ^a   Tiiva, Päivi ^a   Rinnan, Åsmund ^b   Michelsen, Anders ^c   Holopainen, Jarmo K ^a   Rinnan, Riikka ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Climate warming; Heath; Litter; Monoterpene; Sesquiterpene; Subarctic; Tundra; Volatile organic compound

Indexed keywords

SESQUITERPENE; TERPENE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AEROSOL FORMATION; AIR TEMPERATURE; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; BIOGENIC EMISSION; CLIMATE FEEDBACK; DECIDUOUS TREE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; GROWING SEASON; LITTER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MONOTERPENE; SUBARCTIC REGION; TUNDRA; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARCTIC; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLIMATE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEASON;

ARCTIC REGIONS; CLIMATE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; GLOBAL WARMING; MONOTERPENES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEASONS; SESQUITERPENES; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

BETULA PUBESCENS; BETULA PUBESCENS SUBSP. TORTUOSA;

EID: 77954575963     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03270.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arctic climate impact assessment 2005, New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press
2. Arneth A, Monson RK, Schurgers G, Niinemets Ü Palmer PI. Why are estimates of global isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2008, 8:4605-4620.
3. Bäckstrand K, Crill PM, Mastepanov M, Christensen TR, Bastviken D. Non-methane volatile organic compound flux from a subarctic mire in Northern Sweden. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology 2008, 60B:226-237.
4. Beckmann M, Lloyd D. Extraction and identification of volatile organic substances (VOS) from Scottish peat cores. Atmospheric Environment 2001, 35:79-86.
5. Bliss LC, Matveyeva NV. Circumpolar arctic vegetation. Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate, an ecophysiological perspective 1992, 59-90. Chapin FS, Jefferies RLReynolds JFShaver GRSvoboda J. eds, San Diego, CA, USA, Academic Press
6. Bylund H, Nordell O. Biomass proportions, production and leaf nitrogen distribution in a polycormic mountain birch stand (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii) in northern Sweden. Nordic mountain birch ecosystems 2001, 115-126. Wiegolaski FE, ed, Paris, France, UNESCO
7. Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA, Johansson M, Jolly D, Jonasson S. Responses to projected changes in climate and UV-B at the species level. Ambio 2004, 33:418-435.
8. Cornelissen JHC, van Bodegom PM, Aerts R, Callaghan TV, van Logtestijn RSP, Alatalo J, Chapin FS, Gerdol R, Gudmundsson J, Gwynn-Jones D. Global negative vegetation feedback to climate warming responses of leaf litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:619-627.
9. Dicke M. Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help. Plant, Cell and Environment 2009, 32:654-665.
10. Duhl TR, Helmig D, Guenther A. Sesquiterpene emissions from vegetation: a review. Biogeosciences 2008, 5:761-777.
11. Guenther A, Hewitt CN, Erickson D, Fall R, Geron C, Graedel T, Harley P, Klinger L, Lerdau M, McKay WA. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research 1995, 100:8873-8892.
12. Guenther AB, Zimmerman PR, Harley PC, Monson RK, Fall R. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research 1993, 98:12609-12617.
13. Hakola H, Laurila T, Lindfors V, Hellén H, Gaman A, Rinne J. Variation of the VOC emission rates of birch species during the growing season. Boreal Environment Research 2001, 6:237-249.
14. Hakola H, Rinne J, Laurila T. The hydrocarbon emission rates of tea-leafed willow (Salix phylicifolia), silver birch (Betula pendula) and European aspen (Populus tremula). Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32:1825-1833.
15. Hartikainen K, Nerg AM, Kivimäenpää M, Kontunen-Soppela S, Mäenpää M, Oksanen E, Rousi M, Holopainen T. Emissions of volatile organic compounds and leaf structural characteristics of European aspen (Populus tremula) grown under elevated ozone and temperature. Tree Physiology 2009, 29:1163-1173.
16. Havström M, Callaghan TV, Jonasson S. Differential growth responses of Cassiope tetragona, an arctic dwarf shrub, to environmental perturbations among three contrasting high- and subarctic sites. Oikos 1993, 66:389-402.
17. Helmig D, Ortega J, Duhl T, Tanner D, Guenther A, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Milford J, Sakulyanontvittaya T. Sesquiterpene emissions from pine trees - identifications, emission rates and flux estimates for the contiguous United States. Environmental Science and Technology 2007, 41:1545-1553.
18. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press
19. Isebrands JG, Guenther AB, Harley P, Helmig D, Klinger L, Vierling L, Zimmerman P, Geron C. Volatile organic compound emission rates from mixed deciduous and coniferous forests in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:2527-2536.
20. Isidorov V, Jdanova M. Volatile organic compounds from leaves litter. Chemosphere 2002, 48:975-979.
21. Jelén HH. Volatile sesquiterpene hydrocarbons characteristic for Penicillium roqueforti strains producing PR toxin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002, 50:6569-6574.
22. Jelén HH, Mirocha CJ, Wasowicz E, Kamiński E. Production of volatile sesquiterpenes by Fusarium sambucinum strains with different abilities to synthesize trichothecenes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1995, 61:3815-3820.
23. Kiendler-Scharr A, Wildt J, Dal Maso M, Hohaus T, Kleist E, Mentel TF, Tillmann R, Uerlings R, Schurr U, Wahner A. New particle formation in forests inhibited by isoprene emissions. Nature 2009, 46:381-384.
24. Klinger LF, Li Q-J, Guenther AB, Greenberg JP, Baker B, Bai J-H. Assessment of volatile organic compound emissions from ecosystems of China. Journal of Geophysical Research 2002, 107. 10.1029/2001JD001076, doi
25. Komppula M, Lihavainen H, Hatakka J, Paatero J, Aalto P, Kulmala M, Viisanen Y. Observations of new particle formation and size distributions at two different heights and surroundings in subarctic area in northern Finland. Journal of Geophysical Research 2003, 108. 10.1029/2002JD002939, doi
26. Laothawornkitkul J, Taylor JE, Paul ND, Hewitt CN. Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Earth system. New Phytologist 2009, 183:27-51.
27. Leff JW, Fierer N. Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from soil and litter samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2008, 40:1629-1636.
28. Llusià J, Peñuelas J. Seasonal patterns of terpene content and emission from seven Mediterranean woody species in field conditions. American Journal of Botany 2000, 87:133-140.
29. Loreto F, Förster A, Dürr M, Csiky O, Seufert G. On the monoterpene emission under heat stress and on the increased thermotolerance of leaves of Quercus ilex L. fumigated with selected monoterpenes. Plant, Cell and Environment 1998, 21:101-107.
30. Mäntylä E, Alessio GA, Blande JD, Heijari J, Holopainen JK, Laaksonen T, Piirtola P, Klemola T. From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. PLoS ONE 2008, 3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002832, doi
31. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 1997, 386:698-702.
32. Niinemets Ü Loreto F, Reichstein M. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends in Plant Science 2004, 9:180-186.
33. Ortega J, Helmig D. Approaches for quantifying reactive and low-volatility biogenic organic compound emissions by vegetation enclosure techniques - Part A. Chemosphere 2008, 72:343-364.
34. Paavolainen L, Kitunen V, Smolander A. Inhibition of nitrification in forest soil by monoterpenes. Plant and Soil 1998, 205:147-154.
35. Peñuelas J. An increasingly scented world. New Phytologist 2008, 180:735-738.
36. Peñuelas J, Llusià J. Linking photorespiration, monoterpenes and thermotolerance in Quercus. New Phytologist 2002, 155:227-237.
37. Pétron G, Harley P, Greenberg J, Guenther A. Seasonal temperature variations influence isoprene emission. Geophysical Research Letters 2001, 28:1707-1710.
38. Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Bååth E, Jonasson S. Mineralization and carbon turnover in subarctic heath soil as affected by warming and additional litter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2007, 39:3014-3023.
39. Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Jonasson S. Effects of litter addition and warming on soil carbon, nutrient pools and microbial communities in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology 2008, 39:271-281.
40. Rinnan R, Rinnan T, Holopainen T, Holopainen JK, Pasanen P. Emission of non-methane volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from boreal peatland microcosms-effects of ozone exposure. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39:921-930.
41. Sakulyanontvittaya T, Duhl T, Wiedinmyer C, Helmig D, Matsunaga S, Potosnak M, Milford J, Guenther A. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene emission estimates for the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42:1623-1629.
42. Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL, Lerdau MT, Geron CD. Weather effects on isoprene emission capacity and applications in emissions algorithms. Ecological Applications 1999, 9:1132-1137.
43. Staudt M, Bertin N, Frenzel B, Seufert G. Seasonal variation in amount and composition of monoterpenes emitted by young Pinus pinea trees - implications for emission modeling. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 2000, 35:77-99.
44. Tape K, Sturm M, Racine C. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Global Change Biology 2006, 12:686-702.
45. Tarvainen V, Hakola H, Hellén H, Bäck J, Hari P, Kulmala M. Temperature and light dependence of the VOC emissions of Scots pine. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2005, 5:989-998.
46. Tholl D, Boland W, Hansel A, Loreto F, Röse USR, Schnitzler J-P. Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. Plant Journal 2006, 45:540-560.
47. Tiiva P, Faubert P, Michelsen A, Holopainen T, Holopainen JK, Rinnan R. Climatic warming increases isoprene emission from a subarctic heath. New Phytologist 2008, 180:853-863.
48. Tiiva P, Faubert P, Räty S, Holopainen JK, Holopainen T, Rinnan R. Contribution of vegetation and water table on isoprene emission from boreal peatland microcosms. Atmospheric Environment 2009, 43:5469-5475.
49. Tiiva P, Rinnan R, Faubert P, Räsänen J, Holopainen T, Kyrö E, Holopainen JK. Isoprene emission from a subarctic peatland under enhanced UV-B radiation. New Phytologist 2007a, 176:346-355.
50. Tiiva P, Rinnan R, Holopainen T, Mörsky SK, Holopainen JK. Isoprene emissions from boreal peatland microcosms; effects of elevated ozone concentration in an open field experiment. Atmospheric Environment 2007b, 41:3819-3828.
51. Truong C, Palmé AE, Felber F. Recent invasion of the mountain birch Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa above the treeline due to climate change: genetic and ecological study in northern Sweden. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007, 20:369-380.