The use of ERCP versus MRCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 852-854

  Enns, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; NOTE; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77954568415     PISSN: 15547914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Moff SL, Kamel IR, Eustace J, Lawler LP, Kantsevoy S, et al. Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:219-223.
2. Vitellas KM, Enns RA, Keogan MT, Freed KS, Spritzer CE, et al. Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:327-334.
3. McLoughlin M, Enns R. Endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008;10:177-185.
4. Talwalkar JA, Angulo P, Johnson CD, Petersen BT, Lindor KD. Cost-minimization analysis of MRC versus ERCP for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2004;40:39-45. (Pubitemid 38868921)
5. Meagher S, Yusoff I, Kennedy W, Martel M, Adam V, Barkun A. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy. 2007;39:222-228. (Pubitemid 46510793)