Examining the individual and perceived neighborhood associations of leisure-time physical activity in persons with spinal cord injury

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 192-197

  Arbour Nicitopoulos, Kelly P ^a,c   Ginis, Kathleen A Martin ^a   Wilson , Philip M ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Perceived environment; Physical activity; Spinal cord injury; Theory of Planned Behavior

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEISURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 77954565186     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9149-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Hicks AL, Craven BC. Development and evaluation of an activity measure for people with spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1099-1111.
2. Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: Effects on strength, arm ergometry performance, and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:34-43.
3. Nash MS, Jacobs PL, Mendez AJ, Goldberg RB. Circuit resistance training improves atherogenic lipid profiles of persons with chronic paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24:2-9.
4. Dearwater SR, Laporte RE, Cauley JA, Brenes G. Assessment of physical activity in inactive populations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:651-655.
5. Crocker PR. Sport and exercise psychology and research with individuals with physical disabilities: Using theory to advance knowledge. Adapt Phys Act Q. 1993;10:324-335.
6. Latimer AE, Martin Ginis KA. The theory of planned behavior in the prediction of leisure time physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:389-396.
7. Ajzen I. From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, eds. Action Control: From Cognition to Behaviour. Germany: Springer; 1985:11-39.
8. Spence JC, Lee RE. Toward a comprehensive model of physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4:7-24.
9. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: A review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:188-199.
10. Duncan MJ, Spence JC, Mummery WK. Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:11.
11. Rhodes RE, Brown SG, McIntyre CA. Integrating the perceived neighborhood environment and the theory of planned behavior when predicting walking in a Canadian sample. Am J Health Promot. 2006;21:110-118.
12. de Bruijn GJ, Kremers S P J, Lensvelt-Mulders G, de Vries H, van Mechelen W, Brug J. Modeling individual and physical environmental factors with adolescent physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30:507-512.
13. Godin G, Amireault S, Bélanger-Gravel A, Vohl MC, Pérusse L. Prediction of leisure-time physical activity among obese individuals. Obesity. 2009;17:706-707.
14. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1793-1812.
15. Maddison R, Vander Hoorn S, Jiang Y, et al. The environment and physical activity: The influence of psychosocial, perceived and built environmental factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:19.
16. Rhodes RE, Courneya KS, Blanchard CM, Plotnikoff RC. Prediction of leisure-time walking: An integration of social cognitive, perceived environmental, and personality factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007;4:51-62.
17. Spivock M, Gauvin L, Brodeur JM. Neighborhood-level active living buoys for individuals with physical disabilities. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:224-230.
18. Martin Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Buchholz AC, et al. Establishing evidence-based physical activity guidelines: Methods for the study of health and activity in people with spinal cord injury (SHAPE-SCI). Spinal Cord. 2008;46:216-221.
19. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1552-1558.
20. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
21. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:411-423.
22. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2005.
23. Markland D. The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett's recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Pers Individ Differ. 2007;42:851-858.
24. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993:136-162.
25. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155-159.
26. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50:741-749.
27. Canadian Paraplegic Association. The workforce participation survey of Canadians with spinal cord injury. Available at: http://www.canparaplegic.org/ pdf/1/wforcepdf. Accessibility verified October 20, 2005.
28. Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC. Can current physical activity act as a reasonable proxy measure of future physical activity: Evaluating cross-sectional and passive prospective designs with the use of social cognition models. Prev Med. 2005;40:547-555.
29. Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:175-181.