A situation-aware resource recommender based on fuzzy and semantic web rules

International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 411-430

  Ciaramella, Alessandro ^a   Cimino, Mario G C A ^b   Lazzerini, Beatrice ^b   Marcelloni, Francesco ^b  

^a IMT SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED STUDIES LUCCA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

context awareness; fuzzy inference system; Mobile service recommender; semantic rules; web ontology

Indexed keywords

FUZZY INFERENCE; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; WEBSITES;

CONTEXT- AWARENESS; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEMS; HAND HELD DEVICE; MOBILE SERVICE; MOBILE SERVICE RECOMMENDE; MOBILE USERS; REASONERS; SEMANTIC RULES; SITUATION-AWARE; WEB ONTOLOGY;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77954562597     PISSN: 02184885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218488510006623     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Apple Inc., App Store, www.apple.com/iphone/ appstore, accessed Jan 2010.
2. Google Inc., Android Market, www.android.com/ market, accessed Jan 2010.
3. Microsoft Corp., Windows Mobile Catalog, www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile /catalog, accessed Jan 2010.
4. Nokia Corp., Ovi Store, store.ovi.com, accessed Jan 2010.
5. Research In Motion Limited, BlackBerry App World, www.blackberry.com/ appworld, accessed Jan 2010.
6. K. Heinonen and M. Pura, Classifying mobile services, in Proc. Helsinki Mobility Roundtable, Working Papers on Information Systems, Sprouts, Vol.6, Art. 42, 2006.
7. S. Figge, Situation-dependent services -a challenge for mobile network operators, Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, Vol.57, Issue 12, 2004, pp. 1416-1422.
8. M. Luther, Y. Fukazawa, M. Wagner and A. Kurakake, Situational reasoning for task-oriented mobile service recommendation, The Knowledge Engineering Review, Cambridge University Press, Vol.23, 2008, pp. 7-19.
9. L. W. Goix, M. Valla, L. Cerami and P. Falcarin, Situation inference for mobile users: a rule based approach, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Mobile Data Management (MDM '07), IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 299-303.
10. W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004, electronically available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
11. W3C, SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004, electronically available at http://www.w3.org/ Submission/SWRL/.
12. Y. L. Tai, S. R. Tsai, G. H. Huang, C. M. Lee, L. J. Tsai, K. F. Ssu and S. J. Wey, A labelbased file system, Journal of Computers, Vol.19, No.4, January 2009.
13. D. Abrams, R. Baecker, and M. Chignell, Information archiving with bookmarks: personal web space construction and organization, in Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98), ACM Press, 1998, pp. 41-48.
14. R. Kanawati and M. Malek, Cowing: a collaborative bookmark management system, in Proc. Int. Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents (CIA '02), Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2828, 2001, pp. 34-39.
15. S. Nakajima, S. Oyama, K. Sumiya and K. Tanaka, Context-dependent web bookmarks and their usage as queries, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE '02), Systems Engineering, 2002, pp. 333-341.
16. P. K. Vatturi, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller and B. Brownholtz, Tag-based filtering for personalized bookmark recommendations, Proc. 17th ACM Conference on information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '08), ACM, 2008, pp. 1395-1396.
17. S. Bloehdorn, O. Görlitz, S. Schenk and M. Völkel, TagFS, tag semantics for hierarchical file systems, in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Management, (IKNOW' 06), 2006.
18. J. Hong, E.-H. Suh, J. Kim and S. Y. Kim, Context-aware system for proactive personalized service based on context history, Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier, Vol.36, No.4, 2009, pp. 7448-7457.
19. F. A. Hansen, Context-aware mobile hypermedia: concepts, framework, and applications, PhD Thesis, University of Aarhus, 2006.
20. N. Weißenberg, An ontology-based approach to personalized situation-aware mobile service supply, GeoInformatica, Vol.10, No.1, Springer, 2006, pp. 55-90.
21. T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, A context modeling survey, in Proc. First Int. Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management (UbiComp '04), 2004.
22. E. Sanchez and T. Yamanoi, Fuzzy ontologies for the semantic web, H. L. Larsen et al. (eds.), FQAS 2006, LNCS, Vol.4027, pp. 691-699, Springer, Heidelberg, 2006.
23. L. A. Zadeh, Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Information Sciences, No.178, 2008, pp. 2751-2779.
24. G. Sun, J. Chen, W. Guo and K. J. R. Liu, Signal processing techniques in network-aided positioning: a survey of state-of-the-art positioning designs, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2005, Vol.22, No.4, pp. 12-23.
25. Topografix, GPS Exchange Format, official website, http://www.topografix. com/gpx.asp, accessed Jan 2010.
26. Google Inc., Google Maps API, http://code.google.com/apis/maps/, accessed Jan 2010.
27. Google Inc., Google Calendar API, http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/, accessed Jan 2010.
28. A. K. Dey and G. D. Abowd, Towards a better understanding of context and contextawareness, in Proc. Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When and How of Context-Awareness, ACM Press, 2000.
29. M. Fernández López, Overview of methodologies for building ontologies, in Proc. Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5), Stockholm, Sweden, August 2, 1999.
30. W3C, Public Time Ontology, date, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time, accessed June 2009.
31. L. Ding, H. Chen, L. Kagal and T. Finin, Public Address Ontology, http://daml.umbc.edu/ ontologies/ittalks/ address, accessed June 2009.
32. F. Van Harmelen, Fuzzy logic and the semantic web, E. Sanchez (eds.), Capturing Intelligence (Elsevier, 2006).
33. T. Lukasiewicz and U. Straccia, An overview of uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web, Technical Report INFSYS RR-1843-06-07, Institut für Informationssysteme, Technische Universität, Wien (2006).
34. F. Bobillo and U. Straccia, FuzzyDL: An expressive fuzzy description logic reasoner, in Proc. 2008 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2008), Hong Kong, June 2008.
35. F. Bobillo and U. Straccia, An OWL Ontology for fuzzy OWL 2, J. Rauch et al. (Eds.): ISMIS 2009, LNAI 5722, pp. 151-160 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009).
36. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Protégé OWL and SWRL editor, http://protege.stanford.edu, accessed Jan 2010.
37. F. Bobillo, M. Delgado and J. Gomez-Romero, Crisp representations and reasoning for fuzzy ontologies, in Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.17, No.4, 2009.
38. University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), Swoogle, semantic web search, http://swoogle.umbc.edu/, accessed Jan 2010.
39. Clark&Parsia, Pellet: OWL 2 Reasoner for Java, http://clarkparsia. com/pellet/, accessed Jan 2010.
40. HP Labs Semantic Web Programme, Jena -A Semantic Web Framework for Java, http://jena.sourceforge.net/, accessed Jan 2010.
41. P. Cingolani, JFuzzyLogic, a Java package that implement Fuzzy Control Language (FCL) specification (IEC 1131p7), http://jfuzzylogic.sourceforge.net, accessed Jan 2010.
42. M. Kifer, G. Lausen and J. Wu, Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages, J. ACM, Vol.42, No.4, 1995.
43. The Rule Markup Initiative, RuleML, http://ruleml.org/, accessed April 2010.