Evaluation of the rebound hernia repair device for laparoscopic hernia repair

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 95-102

  Torres Villalobos, Gonzalo ^a   Sorcic, Laura ^b   Ruth, George R ^b   Andrade, Rafael ^a   Martin del Campo, Luis A ^d   Anderson, J Kyle ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Experimental Surgery Department   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Hernia; Laparoscopic hernia repair; Mesh; Pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; INGUINAL HERNIA; INSTRUMENTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SWINE;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HERNIA, INGUINAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MATERIALS TESTING; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SWINE;

EID: 77954557397     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014824     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, et al. Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(12):965-969.
2. Bellon JM, Jurado F, Garcia-Honduvilla N, et al. The structure of a biomaterial rather than its chemical composition modulates the repair process at the peritoneal level. Am J Surg. 2002;184(2):154-159.
3. Coda A, Bendavid R, Botto-Micca F, et al. Structural alterations of prosthetic meshes in humans. Hernia. 2003;7(1):29-34.
4. Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, et al. In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):211-220.
5. Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Klinge U. [Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias]. Chirurg. 1999;70(4):422-430.
6. Dion YM, Laplante R, Charara J, Marois M. The influence of the number of endoclips and of mesh incorporation on the strength of an experimental hernia patch repair. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(11):1324-1328.
7. Hollinsky C, Gobl S. Bursting strength evaluation after different types of mesh fixation in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(10):958-961.
8. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg. 2001;233(1):1-7.
9. Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):136-141.
10. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, et al. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2001;88(8):1122-1126.
11. Shellock FG. Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(1):152-157.
12. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16(6):721-732.
13. ASTM. Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment. 2005.
14. Shellock FG, Shellock VJ. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(3):543-547.
15. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2005;12(1):63-69.
16. Weyhe D, Schmitz I, Belyaev O, et al. Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response. World J Surg. 2006;30(8):1586-1591.
17. Greca FH, de Paula JB, Biondo-Simoes ML, et al. The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs. Hernia. 2001;5(2):59-64.
18. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, et al. Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2002;103(2):208-214.
19. Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Kockerling F. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(3):402-409.
20. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, et al. Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1472-1480.
21. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Muller C, et al. Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes-a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg. 2007;31(1):234-244.
22. O'Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92(2):166-170.
23. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, et al. Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2001;233(1):18-25.
24. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Baker D. In vivo study of meshes implanted over the inguinal ring and external iliac vessels in uncastrated pigs. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(3):247-251.
25. Jubb KVF, Kennedy PC, Palmer N. Pathology of Domestic Animals. 4th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993.
26. Nieberle K, Cohrs P. Textbook of the Special Pathological Anatomy of Domestic Animals. Rev. by Paul Cohrs. 1st English ed. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1967.
27. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U. The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2(1):103-117.
28. Roukis TS. A 1-piece shape-metal nitinol intramedullary internal fixation device for arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint in neuropathic patients with diabetes. Foot Ankle Spec. 2009;2(3):130-134.
29. Park JG, Jung GS, Oh KS, Park SJ. Double-layered PTFEcovered Nitinol stents: experience in 32 patients with malignant esophageal strictures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009.
30. Sadowski J, Kapelak B, Pfitzner R, Bartus K. Sutureless aortic valve bioprothesis '3F/ATS Enable' - 4.5 years of a single-centre experience. Kardiol Pol. 2009;67(8):956-963.