The use of the RCQ-D in patients with poly drug abuse

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 409-420

  Raes, Veerle ^a   De Weert Van Oene, Gerdien A ^b   Velasquez, Mary M ^c,d   De Maeseneer, Jan ^e   De Jong, Cor A J ^f  

^a De Sleutel ^*  (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d School of Social Work   (United States)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Inpatient motivation centre; Multiple substance abuse; Psychometric characteristics; RCQ D; Readiness for change

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954555451     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/16066350903291066     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Annis HM, Schober R, Kelly E. 1996. Matching addiction outpatient counselling to client readiness for change: The role of structured relapse prevention counselling. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 4:37-45.
2. Carbonari JP, DiClemente CC. 2000. Using transtheoretical model profiles to differentiate levels of alcohol abstinence success. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68(5):810-817.
3. Carey KB, Purnine DM, Maisto SA, Carey MP. 1999. Assessing readiness to change substance abuse: A critical review of instruments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 6(3):245-266.
4. Carney MM, Kivlahan DR. 1995. Motivational subtypes among veterans seeking substance abuse treatment: Profiles based on stages of change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 9(2):135-142.
5. Cosden M, Basch JE, Campos E, Greenwell A, Barazani S, Walker S. 2006. Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency 52:599-618.
6. de Fuentes-Merillas L, de Jong CAJ, Schippers GM. 2000. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the readiness to change questionnaire. Alcohol and Alcoholism 37:93-99.
7. DiClemente CC. 2005. A premature obituary for the transtheoretical model: A comment on West. Addiction 100:1046-1048.
8. DiClemente CC, Hughes SL. 1990. Stages of change profiles in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse 2:217-235.
9. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, Velicer WF, Velasquez MM, Rossi JS. 1991. The process of smoking cessation. An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59:295-304.
10. Dom G, Raes V, de Wilde B, van den Brink W. 2004. Meetinstrumenten bij stoornissen in het gebruik van middelen. (Instruments measuring substance use disorders.) Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie (Journal of Psychiatry) 46:671-674.
11. Etter J-F. 2005. Theoretical tools for the industrial era in smoking cessation counselling: A comment on West. Addiction 100:1041-1042.
12. Forsberg L, Ekman S, Halldin J, Rönnberg S. 2004. The Readiness to Change Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of a Swedish version and a comparison of scoring methods. British Journal of Health Psychology 9:335-346.
13. Forsberg L, Halldin J, Wennberg P. 2003. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the readiness to change questionnaire. Alcohol and Alcoholism 38:276-280.
14. Hannöver W, Thyrian JR, Hapke U, Rümpf H-J, Meyer C, John U. 2000. The Readiness to Change Questionnaire in subjects with hazardous alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse and dependence in a general population survey. Alcohol and Alcoholism 37:362-369.
15. Herzog T. 2005. When popularity outstrips the evidence: Comment on West. Addiction 100:1040-1041.
16. Hodgins DC. 2005. Weighing the pros and cons of changing change models: A comment on West. Addiction 100:1042-1043.
17. Marlowe DB, Kirby KC, Merikle EP, Festinger DS, Mc Lellan AT. 2001. Multidimensional assessment of perceived treatment-entry pressures among substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 15:97-108.
18. Miller WR, Tonigan JS. 1996. Assessing drinkers motivation for change. The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 10:81-89.
19. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. 1982. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice 20:161-173.
20. Rodriguez-Martos A, Rubio G, Aubà J, Santo-Domingo J, Torralba LI, Campillo M. 2000. Readiness to change questionnaire: Reliability study of its Spanish version. Alcohol and Alcoholism 35:270-275.
21. Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W. 1992. Development of a short 'readiness to change' questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. British Journal of Addictions 87:743-754.
22. Simpson DD, Joe GW. 1993. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice 30:357-368.
23. Sutton S. 2005. Another nail in the coffin of the transtheoretical model? A comment on West. Addiction 100:1043-1046.
24. Velasquez MM, Maurer GG, Crouch C, Diclementi CC. 2006. Group treatment for substance abuse: A stages-ofchange therapy manual (Dutch Translation by de Jong CAJ and Verbrugge CAG). Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment.
25. Verbrugge CAG, de Jong AAJ, Holsbeek T, van Dijk R. 2005. Wat motiveert tot onderlinge vergelijking? Evaluatieverslag project 'IMC benchmarking'. (What is motivating for mutual comparison? Evaluation-report project 'IMC benchmarking'), GGZ Nederland: Amersfoort, 2005. p 294.
26. West R. 2005. Time for a change: Putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest. Addiction 100:1036-1039.