Divided opinions on the split fovea

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2784-2785

  Ellis, Andrew W ^a   Brysbaert, Marc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; EYE FIXATION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LIP READING; NOTE; RETINA FOVEA; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77954538839     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.030     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Ashwin C., Wheelwright S., Baron-Cohen S. Laterality biases to chimeric faces in Asperger syndrome: What is 'right' about face-processing?. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2005, 35:183-196.
2. Bourne V.J. Chimeric faces, visual field bias, and reaction time bias: Have we been missing a trick?. Laterality 2008, 13:92-103.
3. Brysbaert M. Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research 1994, 64:151-161.
4. Brysbaert M. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception. Brain and Language 2004, 88:259-267.
5. Butler S., Gilchrist I.D., Burt D.M., Perrett D.I., Jones E., Harvey M. Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:52-59.
6. Butler S.H., Harvey M. Perceptual biases in chimeric face processing: Eye-movement patterns cannot explain it all. Brain Research 2006, 1124:96-99.
7. Campbell R. The lateralization of lip-reading: a first look. Brain and Cognition 1986, 5:1-21.
8. Campbell R. The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 2008, 363:1001-1010.
9. Coolican J., Eskes G.A., McMullen P.A., Lecky E. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion. Brain and Cognition 2008, 66:176-187.
10. Ellis A.W. Length, formats, neighbors, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation. Brain and Language 2004, 88:355-366.
11. Ellis A.W., Brysbaert M. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in visual word recognition: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:353-365.
12. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:223-233.
13. Hsiao J.H.W., Shillcock R., Lee C.Y. Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: Evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1280-1292.
14. Hunter Z.R., Brysbaert M., Knecht S. Foveal reading requires interhemispheric communication. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19:1373-1387.
15. Jordan T.R., Paterson K. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in visual word recognition: A critical assessment of recent research. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2341-2353.
16. Jordan T.R., Paterson K. Where is the evidence for split fovea processing in word recognition?. Neuropsychologia 2010, 89:2782-2783.
17. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
18. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1457-1506.
19. Shillcock R., Ellison T.M., Monaghan P. Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review 2000, 107:824-851.
20. Van der Haegen L., Drieghe D., Brysbaert M. Split fovea theory and the Leicester critique: What do the data say?. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:96-106.
21. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:221-243.
22. Yovel G., Tambini A., Brandman T. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:3061-3068.