The sensitivity and specificity of p16INK4a cytology vs HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical disease in the triage of ASC-US and LSIL Pap cytology results

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 12-21

  Denton, Karin J ^a   Bergeron, Christine ^b   Klement, Petra ^c   Trunk, Marcus J ^c,e   Keller, Thomas ^d   Ridder, Ruediger ^c  

^a NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b LABORATOIRE CERBA   (France)

^c MTM Laboratories   (Germany)

^d ACOMED Statistik   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

ASC US; Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; Cervical cytology; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV; Human papillomavirus; Immunocytochemistry; Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL; p16INK4a; Triage

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR 2A;

ARTICLE; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE; CANCER GRADING; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW GRADE SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION; NONHUMAN; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL; SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VIRUS EXAMINATION; WART VIRUS;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR P16; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRIAGE; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77954532457     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: 19437722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCP3CD9YKYFJDQL     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890-907.
2. Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002;287:2120-2129. (Pubitemid 34437347)
3. ALTS Study Group. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1383-1392.
4. Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:293-299. (Pubitemid 32219816)
5. Wright JD, Rader JS, Davila R, et al. Human papillomavirus triage for young women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:822-829.
6. Cuschieri K, Wentzensen N. Human papillomavirus mRNA and p16 detection as biomarkers for the improved diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2536-2545.
7. Wentzensen N, von Knebel Doeberitz M. Biomarkers in cervical cancer screening. Dis Markers. 2007;23:315-330.
8. INK4a immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Cancer Treatment Rev. 2009;35:210-220.
9. INK4a and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:894-901.
10. Yoshida T, Fukuda T, Sano T, et al. Usefulness of liquidbased cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials. Cancer. 2004;102:100-108. (Pubitemid 38489967)
11. INK4a expression or human papillomavirus test: a retrospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:578-584.
12. INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 2007;111:58-66.
13. INK4a assay: correlation with biopsy follow-up results. Cancer. 2007;111:83-92.
14. INK4a and HPV-PCR on ThinPrep samples with histological follow-up. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:453-459.
15. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114-2119.
16. Evans DMD, Hudson EA, Brown CL, et al. Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. J Clin Pathol. 1986;39:933-944.
17. INK4a-stained cervical squamous cells in liquid-based cytology samples. Cancer. 2005;105:461-467.
18. Pepe MS. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
19. INK4a immunolocalization with the presence of human papillomavirus by Hybrid Capture 2 for the detection of cervical dysplasia/neoplasia. Cancer. 2006;108:451-461.
20. Szarewski A, Ambroisine L, Cadman L, et al. Comparison of predictors for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal smears. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3033-3042.
21. INK4a-positive cells in cervical cytology samples. Acta Cytol. 2004;48:771-782.