Validation and evaluation of two multivariate statistical models for predictive shallow landslide susceptibility mapping of the Eastern Pyrenees (Spain)

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 507-523

  Baeza, Cristina ^a   Lantada, Nieves ^a   Moya, Jose ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Logistic regression; Shallow landslides; Susceptibility evaluation; Validation

Indexed keywords

CONTRIBUTING AREAS; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CUT-OFF VALUE; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DISCRIMINANT MODELS; END USERS; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; K-S TEST; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LOGISTIC MODELS; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL MODELS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; PYRENEES; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; RIGOROUS METHODOLOGIES; SHALLOW LANDSLIDE; SHALLOW LANDSLIDES; SHALLOW LANDSLIDES SUSCEPTIBILITY; STABLE ZONE; STATISTICAL MODELS; STUDY AREAS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPS;

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LANDSLIDES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GIS; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LANDSLIDE; MODEL VALIDATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

PYRENEES; SPAIN;

EID: 77954526460     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-009-0361-5     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65: 15-31.
2. Baeza C, Corominas J (2001) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques. Earth Surf Proc Land 26: 1251-1263.
3. Beguería S (2006) Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Nat Hazards 37: 315-329.
4. Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5: 853-862.
5. Can T, Nefeslioglu H, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman T (2005) Susceptibility assessment of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analysis. Geomorphology 72: 250-271.
6. Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (1995) GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. pp 135-175.
7. Carrara A, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Land 28(10): 1125-1142.
8. Carrara A, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94: 353-378.
9. Chung C, Fabbri A (1993) The representation of geoscience information for data integration. Nonrenew Resour 2(2): 122-139.
10. Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 65(12): 1389-1399.
11. Clark WA, Hosking PL (1986) Statistical methods for geographers. Wiley, New York, p 518.
12. Corominas J, Baeza C, Salueña I (1992) The influence of geometrical slope characteristics and land use on the development of shallow landslides. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Landslides, pp 919-924.
13. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, pp 36-75.
14. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42: 213-228.
15. Dillon WR, Goldstein M (1986) Multivariate analysis. Methods and applications. Wiley, New York, p 587.
16. Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping of Cekmece area (Istanbul, Turkey) by conditional probability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2: 155-208.
17. Duman T, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu H, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51: 241-256.
18. Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66: 327-343.
19. Field AP (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. p 779.
20. Gallart F, Clotet N (1988) Some aspects of the geomorphic processes triggered by an extrem rainfall event: the November 1982 flood in The Eatern Pyrenees. Catena 13: 79-85.
21. Gao J (1993) Identification of topographic setting conducive to landsliding from DEM in Nelson County, Virginia (USA). Earth Surf Proc Land 8: 579-591.
22. Gorsevski PV, Gessler P, Foltz RB (2000) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using Discriminant analysis and GIS. In: GIS in the Rockies 2000 conference and workshop, applications for the 21st Century, Denver, Colorado, pp 25-27.
23. Greenway DR (1987) Vegetation and slope stability. In: Anderson MG, Richards KS (eds) Slope Stability, pp 187-230.
24. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 37: 149-165.
25. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81: 166-184.
26. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839-843.
27. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, p 373.
28. Hürlimann M, Baeza C (2002) Analysis of debris-flow events in the Eastern Pyrenees, Spain. In: First European conference on landslides, Praga, pp 213-220.
29. Jibson RW, Harp EL, Micahel JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58: 271-289.
30. Johnson KA, Sitar N (1989) Hydrologic conditions leading to debris-flow initiation. Can Geotech J 27: 789-801.
31. Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Bimetrics 33: 159-174.
32. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40: 1095-1113.
33. Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2002) Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model. Environ Geol 43: 120-131.
34. Lee S, Ryu J-H, Won J-S, Park H-J (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71: 289-302.
35. Liu C, Frazier P, Kumar L (2007) Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sens Environ 107: 606-616.
36. Lowry R (2009). VassartStats: web site for statistical computation http://faculty. vassar. edu/lowry/VassarStats. html.
37. Luzi L, Pergalani F, Terlien MTJ (2000) Slope vulnerability to earthquake at subregional scale, using probabilistic techniques and geographic information system. Eng Geol 58: 313-336.
38. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38: 921-931.
39. Manson IB (2003) Binary events. In: Jollifee IT, Stephenson DB (ed) Forecast verification. A practitioner guide in atmospheric sciences. pp 37-76.
40. Muñoz JA, Martínez A, Vergés J (1986) Thrust sequences in the Spanish Eastern Pyrenees. J Struct Geol 8(3/4): 399-405.
41. Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment of the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97: 171-191.
42. Ohlmacher G, Davis J (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69: 331-343.
43. Oyagui N (1984) Landslides in weathered rocks and residual soils in Japan and surrounding areas: a state of the art report. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on landslides, 3, pp 1-31.
44. Park HM (2008) Comparing group means: T-tests and one-way ANOVA using Stata, SAS and SPSS http://www. iu. edu/~statmath/stat/all/ttest/index. html.
45. Poli S, Sterlacchini S (2007) Landslide representation strategies in susceptibility studies using weights-of-evidence modeling technique. Nat Resour Res 16(2): 121-134.
46. Remondo J, González-Díez A, Díaz de Terán JR, Cendrero A (2003) Landslide susceptibility models using spatial data analysis techniques. A case study from the Lower Deba Valley, Guipúzcoa (Spain). Nat Hazards 30: 267-279.
47. Santacana N, Baeza C, Corominas J, De Paz A, Marturià J (2003) A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat Hazards 30: 281-295.
48. SPSS (2009) SPSS statistics http://www. spss. com/statistics/.
49. Strand M (1979) Estimation of a population total under a "Bernoulli Sampling" procedure. Am Stat 33(2): 81-84.
50. Thiery Y, Malet J-P, Sterlacchini S, Puissant A, Maquaire O (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphology 92: 38-59.
51. van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 76: 392-410.
52. van Westen CJ, Terlien MTJ (1996) An approach towards deterministic landslide hazard analysis in GIS. A case study from Manizales (Colombia). Earth Surf Proc Land 21: 853-868.
53. van Westen C, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and rosk zonation: why is it still so difficult? B Eng Geol Environ 65: 167-184.
54. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79(3-4): 251-266.
55. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) plots. Clin Chem 39: 561-577.