MUSHI: A multi-device framework for collaborative inquiry learning

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 453-459

  Lyons, Leilah ^a   Lee, Joseph ^a   Quintana, Christopher ^a   Soloway, Elliot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LOADS; COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIOR; HAND HELD DEVICE; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS; INQUIRY LEARNING; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MULTIDEVICE INTERFACES; PILOT STUDIES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; SCAFFOLDS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 77954514937     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2), 131-152.
2. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in Learning: New Environments in Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 289-325.
3. Buckley, B. C, Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., Wilensky, U., Dede, C, & Willett, J. (2004) Model-Based Teaching and Learning with BioLogica: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23-41.
4. Colella, V. (2000). Participatory Simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471-500.
5. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
6. Danesh, A., Inkpen, K., Lau, F., Shu, K., & Booth, K. (2001). Geney": Designing a Collaborative Activity for the Palm" Handheld Computer, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States, 388-395.
7. Goldman, S. R. (2003). Learning in complex domains: when and why do multiple representations help? Learning and Instruction, 13 (2), 239-244.
8. Greeno, J.G (2005). Learning in Activity. InK. Sawyer, K. (Ed.). Handbook of Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 169-210.
9. Horwitz, P., Neumann, E., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Teaching science at multiple space time scales. Communications of the ACM, 39(8), 100-102.
10. Inkpen, Kori. (1997) Adapting the Human-Computer Interface to Support Collaborative Learning Environments for Children. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, The University of British Columbia.
11. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(20), pp. 75-83.
13. Kozma, R. (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
14. Krajcik, J. (1991). Developing students' Understanding of chemical concepts. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, & B. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 117-148.
15. Lee, J., Lyons, L., Kawamura, M., Quintana, C, Vath, R., and Soloway, E. (2005). MUSHI: Demonstrating A Multi-User Simulation with Handheld Integration. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, June 8-10, 2005, Boulder, Co.
16. Mevarech, Z. R., (1994). The effectiveness of individualized versus cooperative computer-based integrated learning systems. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 39-52.
17. Russell, J. W., Kozma, R B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N, & Davis, J. (1997). Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330-334.
18. Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 221-231.
19. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
20. Vath, R., Lyons, L., Lee, J., Kawamura, M., Quintana, C, and Soloway, E. (2005). Addressing Assessment Challenges for a Multi-User Simulation with Handheld Integration (MUSHI). Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, June 8-10, 2005, Boulder, CO.
21. Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W.M. (2000). Networked Gridlock: Students Enacting Complex Dynamic Phenomena with the HubNet Architecture. In Fishman, B., & O'Connor-Divelbiss, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 282-289.