Family practitioner's evaluation of an electronic tool for dose adjustment in patients with chronic kidney disease - A qualitative study;Hausärztliche evaluation eines elektronischen informationssystems zur dosisanpassung von medikamenten bei chronischer niereninsuffizienz - Eine qualitative studie

Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 146-151

  Leifermann, Mareike ^a   Gerlach, Ferdinand M ^a   Beyer, Martin ^a   Petersen, Juliana I ^a   Erler, Antje ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Drug prescription; Electronic information systems; Family practice; Qualitative study; Renal insufficiency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TELEPHONE; TIME;

EID: 77954509945     PISSN: 09376801     EISSN: 14399229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3238/zfa.2010.0146     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jehle PM, Langer T. Niereninsuffizienz und Folgeerkrankungen - Prävention, Frühdiagnose und Progressionshemmung. Bremen: UNI-MED, 2004
2. Hallan SI, Coresh J, Astor BC et al. International comparison of the relationship of chronic kidney disease prevalence and ESRD risk. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2006; 17: 2275-2284
3. Bertsche T, Haefeli W (2006) Individualisierte Arzneimitteltherapie bei Niereninsuffizienz. Pharmazeutische Zeitung online. Verfügbar unter: http://www.pharmazeutischezeitung.de/index.php?id=773&no-cache= 1&sword-list[0]=bertsche&sword-list[1]=2006 (letzter Zugriff am 09.01.2010)
4. Pohanka E. Stiefkind Kreatinin-Clearance. Journal für Mineralstoffwechsel 2007; 14: 198-199
5. Salomon L, Deray G, Jaudon MC, Chebassier C, Bossi P, Launay- Vacher V, Diquet B, Ceza JM, Levu S, Brücker G, Ravaud P. Medication Misuse in hospitalized patients with renal impairment. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2003; 15: 331-335
6. Pillans PI, Landsberg PG, Fleming A-M, Fanning M, Sturtevant JM. Evaluation of dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment. Internal Medicine Journal 2003; 33: 10-13 (Pubitemid 36241568)
7. Kelly WN. Prescribed Medications and the Public Health: laying the foundation for risk reduction. New York: The Haworth Press, 2006
8. Ahearn MD, Kerr SJ. General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision-support tools in their prescribing software. The Medical Journal of Australia 2003; 179: 34-37
9. Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GP's perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004; 73: 357-362 (Pubitemid 38621995)
10. Ash JS, Fournier L, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R. Principles for a Successful Computerized Physician Order Entry Implementation. American Medical Informatics Association, Annu Symp Proc. 2003: 36-40
11. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293 (10): 1223-38
12. Mack RL, Nielsen J (1993) Usability inspection methods. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 1993; 25 (1): 28-33
13. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 9. Auflage. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz, 2007
14. www.gbe-bund.de
15. Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M; EB-MeDS Study Group. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Family Practice 2008; 25: 162-167 (Pubitemid 351965934)