Managing end-user preferences in the smart grid

Proceedings of the e-Energy 2010 - 1st Int'l Conf. on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 105-114

  Wang, Chen ^a   De Groot, Martin ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b Tasmania ICT Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

demand response; electricity market; load balancing; Nash equilibrium; smart grid

Indexed keywords

DEMAND RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY MARKET; LOAD-BALANCING; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; SMART GRID;

AUTOMATION; COMMERCE; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; WEB SERVICES;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 77954487382     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1791314.1791330     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. M. Beckmann, C. McGuire, and C. Winsten. Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, 1956.
2. D. Berndt and J. Clifford. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In AAAI-94 workshop on knowledge discovery in databases, pages 229-248, 1994.
3. H. Bessembinder and M. L. Lemmon. Equilibrium pricing and optimal hedging in electricity forward markets. J. Finance, LVII(3):1347-1382, June 2002.
4. M. Carrion, A. Conejo, and J. Arroyo. Forward contracting and selling price determination for a retailer. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 22(4):2105-2113, Nov. 2007.
5. D. Caves, K. Eakin, and A. Faruqui. Mitigating price spikes in wholesale markets through market-based pricing in retail markets. The Electricity Journal, 13(3):13-23, April 2000.
6. S. Darby. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. a review for defra of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, available at: http: // www. eci. ox. ac. uk/ research/ energy/downloads/smart-metering-report.pdf, 2006.
7. E. Even-Dar, A. Kesselman, and Y. Mansour. Convergence time to nash equilibria. In Proc. 30th International Colloq. on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2003, LNCS 2719), pages 502-513, 2003.
8. D. Fotakis, S. Kontogiannis, E. Koutsoupias, M. Mavronicolas, and P. Spirakis. The structure and complexity of nash equilibria for a selfish routing game. In Proc. 29th International Colloq. on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2002), pages 123-134, 2002.
9. R. F. Freund, M. Gherrity, S. Ambrosius, and et.al. Scheduling resources in multi-user, heterogeneous, computing environments with smartnet. In Proceedings 7th IEEE Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW 98), pages 184-199, Mar. 1998.
10. S. Gabriel, A. Conejo, M. Plazas, and S.Balakrishnan. Optimal price and quantity determination for retail electric power contracts. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 21(1):180-187, Feb. 2006.
11. S. Helal, W. Mann, H. El-Zabadani, J. King, Y. Kaddoura, and E. Jansen. The gator tech smart house: a programmable pervasive space. IEEE Computer, 38(3):50-60, 2005.
12. F. Itakura. Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition. IEEE Trans Acoustics Speech Signal Process, 23(ASSP):52-72, 1975.
13. G. James, D. Cohen, and et.al. A deployed multi-agent framework for distributed energy applications. In Proceedings 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, May 2006.
14. D. Kirschen. Demand-side view of electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 18(2):520-527, May 2003.
15. M. Maheswaran, S. Ali, H. Siegel, D. Hensgen, and R. Freund. Dynamic matching and scheduling of a class of independent tasks onto heterogeneous computing systems. In Proceedings 8th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, 1999.
16. S. Marvin, H. Chappells, and S. Guy. Pathways of smart metering development: shaping environmental innovation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(2):109-126, 1999.
17. O.H.Ibarra and C. Kim. Heuristic algorithms for scheduling independent tasks on nonidentical processors. J. ACM, 24(2):280-289, April 1977.
18. M. Piette, D. Watson, N. Motegi, S. Kiliccote, and P. Xu. Automated critical peak pricing field tests: Program descriptioin and results. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. LBNL-59351. Berkeley CA. Available at: http: // drrc. lbl. gov/ drrc-pubs4. html, April 2006.
19. M. A. Piette, G. Ghatikar, S. Kiliccote, E. Koch, D. Hennage, P. Palensky, and C. McParland. Open automated demand response communications specification (version 1.0). California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2009-063 and LBNL-1779E, available at: http://drrc.lbl.gov/openadr/pdf/ cec-500-2009-063.pdf, 2009.
20. J. Strapp, C. King, and S. Talbott. Ontario energy board smart price pilot final report. IBM Global Business Services and eMeter Strategic Consulting,[online], available at: http://www.oeb.gov.on.ca/documents/cases/EB- 2004-0205/smartpricepilot/OSPP% 20Final%20Report% 20-% 20Final070726. pdf, July 2007.
21. U.S. Department of Energy. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. [online], available at: "http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/congress-1252d.pdf", 2006.
22. M. Wald and M. Helft. Google taking a step into power metering. New York Times, in: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/technology/companies/10grid.html, Feb. 2009.
23. C. Wang, M. de Groot, and P. Marendy. A service-oriented system for optimizing residential energy use. In Proceedings IEEE 7th Internation Conference on Web Services (ICWS), July 2009.