Privacy of outsourced data

Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 381-408

  De Capitani di Vimercati, Sabrina ^a   Foresti, Sara ^a   Paraboschi, Stefano ^b   Samarati, Pierangela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954468586     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Davida, G., Wells, D., and Kam, J., A database encryption system with subkeys. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 6: 312, 1981.
2. Hacigümüs, H., Iyer, B., and Mehrotra, S., Providing database as a service. In Proc. of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering, San Jose, CA. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2002, 29.
3. Iyer, B. et al., A framework for efficient storage security in RDBMS. In Bertino, E. et al., Eds., Proc. of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2004), vol. 2992 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Crete, Greece. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 147.
4. Damiani, E. et al., Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs. In Jajodia, S., Atluri, V., and Jaeger, T., Eds., Proc. of the 10thACMConference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS03), Washington, D.C., ACM Press, New York, 2003, 93.
5. Hacigümüs, H., Iyer, B., and Mehrotra, S., Efficient execution of aggregation queries over encrypted relational databases. In Lee, J., Li, J., Wndhang, K., and Lee, D., Eds., Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, vol. 2973 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Jeju Island, Korea. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 125.
6. Damiani, E. et al., Implementation of a storage mechanism for untrusted DBMSs. In Proc. of the Second International IEEE Security in Storage Workshop, Washington, D.C., IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2003, 38.
7. Hacigümüs, H. et al., Executing SQL over encrypted data in the databaseservice-provider model. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD 2002, Madison, WI, ACM Press, New York, 2002, 216.
8. Hore, B., Mehrotra, S., and Tsudik, G., A privacy-preserving index for range queries. In Nascimento, M. et al., Eds., Proc. of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto, Canada. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2004, 720.
9. Wang, Z. et al., Fast query over encrypted character data in database. Communications in Information and Systems, 4: 289, 2004.
10. Wang, Z., Wang, W., and Shi, B., Storage and query over encrypted character and numerical data in database. In Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT’05), Shanghai, China. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2005, 77.
11. Boyens, C. and Gunter, O., Using online services in untrusted environments-a privacy-preserving architecture. In Proc. of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS '03), Naples, Italy, 2003.
12. Domingo-Ferrer, J. A new privacy homomorphism and applications, Information Processing Letters, 6:5, 1996.
13. Evdokimov, S., Fischmann, M., and Gunther, O., Provable security for outsourcing database operations. In Liu, L., Reuter, A., Whang, K., and Zhang, J., Eds., Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE '06), Atlanta, GA, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2006, 117.
14. Agrawal, R. et al., Order preserving encryption for numeric data. In Weikum, G., König, A., and Deßloch, S., Eds., Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD 2004, Paris, France. ACM Press, New York, 2004, 563.
15. Aggarwal, G. et al., Two can keep a secret: A distributed architecture for secure database services. In Proc. of the Second Biennal Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR 2005), Asilomar, CA, 2005, 186.
16. Boneh, D. et al., Public-key encryption with keyword search. In Proc. of the Eurocrypt 2004, vol. 3027 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Interlaken, Switzerland. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 506.
17. Brinkman, R., Doumen, J., and Jonker, W., Using secret sharing for searching in encrypted data. In Jonker, W. and Petkovic, M., Eds., Proc. of the Secure Data Management Workshop, vol. 3178 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Toronto, Canada. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 18.
18. Goh, E., Secure indexes. http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/216/, 2003.
19. Song, D., Wagner, D., and Perrig, A., Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data. In Proc. of the 21st IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, Berkeley, CA, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2000, 44.
20. Waters, B. et al., Building an encrypted and searchable audit log. In Proc. of the 11th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA. Internet Society, Washington, D.C., 2004.
21. Boneh, D. and Franklin, M., Identity-based encryption from the weil pairing. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32: 586, 2003.
22. Ceselli, A. et al., Modeling and assessing inference exposure in encrypted databases. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), 8: 119, 2005.
23. Damiani, E. et al., Measuring inference exposure in outsourced encrypted databases. In Gollmann, D., Massacci, F., and Yautsiukhin, A., Eds., Proc. of the First Workshop on Quality of Protection, vol. 23 of Advances in Information Security, Milan, Italy. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
24. Samarati, P., Protecting respondents’ identities in microdata release. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13: 1010, 2001.
25. Damiani, E. et al., Selective data encryption in outsourced dynamic environments. In Proc. of the Second International Workshop on Views on Designing Complex Architectures (VODCA 2006), Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Bertinoro, Italy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2006.
26. Sandhu, R., On some cryptographic solutions for access control in a tree hierarchy. In Proc. of the 1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference on Exploring Technology: Today and Tomorrow, Dallas, TX. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 1987, 405.
27. Gudes, E., The design of a cryptography-based secure file system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 6: 411, 1980.
28. Sandhu, R., Cryptographic implementation of a tree hierarchy for access control. Information Processing Letters, 27: 95, 1988.
29. Akl, S. and Taylor, P., Cryptographic solution to a problem of access control in a hierarchy. ACM Transactions on Computer System, 1: 239, 1983.
30. Atallah, M., Frikken, K., and Blanton, M., Dynamic and efficient key management for access hierarchies. In Atluri, V., Meadows, C., and Juels, A., Eds., Proc. of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS05), Alexandria, VA, ACM SIGSAC, 2005, 190.
31. De Santis, A., Ferrara, A.L., and Masucci, B., Cryptographic key assignment schemes for any access control policy. Inf. Process. Lett., 92(4): 199-205, 2004.
32. Harn, L. and Lin, H., A cryptographic key generation scheme for multilevel data security. Computers and Security, 9: 539, 1990.
33. Hwang, M. and Yang, W., Controlling access in large partially ordered hierarchies using cryptographic keys. The Journal of Systems and Software, 67: 99, 2003.
34. Liaw, H., Wang, S., and Lei, C., On the design of a single-key-lock mechanism based on Newton’s interpolating polynomial. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 15: 1135, 1989.
35. MacKinnon, S. et al., An optimal algorithm for assigning cryptographic keys to control access in a hierarchy. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 34: 797, 1985.
36. Shen, V. and Chen, T., A novel key management scheme based on discrete logarithms and polynomial interpolations. Computer and Security, 21: 164, 2002.
37. Crampton, J., Martin, K., and Wild, P., On key assignment for hierarchical access control. In Proc. of the 19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW’06), Los Alamitos, CA. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2006, 98.
38. Zych, A. and Petkovic, M., Key management method for cryptographically enforced access control. In Proc. of the 1st Benelux Workshop on Information and System Security, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2006.
39. Birget, J. et al., Hierarchy-based access control in distributed environments. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, Helsinki, Finland. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2002, 229.
40. Ray, I., Ray, I., and Narasimhamurthi, N., A cryptographic solution to implement access control in a hierarchy and more. In Proc. of the 11th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT’02), Monterey, CA. ACM Press, New York, 2002, 65.
41. Tsai, H. and Chang, C., A cryptographic implementation for dynamic access control in a user hierarchy. Computer and Security, 14: 159, 1995.
42. Wong, C., Gouda, M., and Lam, S., Secure group communications using key graphs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 8: 16, 2000.
43. Sun, Y. and Liu, K., Scalable hierarchical access control in secure group communications. In Proc. of the IEEE Infocom, vol. 2, Hong Kong, China. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2004, 1296.
44. Bouganim, L. and Pucheral, P., Chip-secured data access: Confidential data on untrusted servers. In Bernstein, P. et al., Eds., Proc. of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Hong Kong, China. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2002, 131.
45. Bouganim, L. et al., Chip-secured data access: Reconciling access rights with data encryption. In Freytag, J., Lockemann, P., Abiteboul, S., Carey, M., Selinger, P., and Heuer, A., Eds., Proc. of the 29th VLDB Conference, Berlin, Germany. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2003, 1133.