The implicit rules of evidence-based policy analysis, updated

Addiction

Volumn 105, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1335-1336

  MacCoun, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cannabis policy; cannabis prevalence; drug policy; drug prohibition; evidence based policy making; standards of proof

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CANNABIS SMOKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MANAGEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NOTE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MARIJUANA SMOKING; MIDDLE AGED; POLICY MAKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954467766     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02936.x     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Macleod J., Hickman M. How ideology shapes the evidence and the policy: what do we know about cannabis use and what should we do? Addiction 2010 105 : 1326 1330.
2. MacCoun R. J., Reuter P. The implicit rules of evidence-based drug policy: a US perspective. Int J Drug Policy 2008 19 : 231 232.
3. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). 2009 Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in Europe (Table GPS-5).
4. MacCoun R. J., Paletz S. Citizens' perceptions of ideological bias in research on public policy controversies. Polit Psychol 2009 30 : 43 65.