Altered spatial distribution of visual attention in near and far space after early deafness

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2693-2698

  Chen, Qi ^a   He, Guihua ^a   Chen, Keping ^a   Jin, Zhicheng ^a   Mo, Lei ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Central vision; Early deafness; Far space; Flanker; Near space; Peripheral vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADAPTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954459535     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baker-Shenk C., Cokely D. American sign language: A teacher's resource text on grammar and culture 1980, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.
2. Bavelier D., Brozinsky C., Tomann A., Mitchell T., Neville H., Liu G. Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21(22):8931-8942.
3. Bavelier D., Dye M.W., Hauser P.C. Do deaf individuals see better?. Trends in Cognitive Science 2006, 10(11):512-518.
4. Bavelier D., Neville H.J. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?. Nature Review Neuroscience 2002, 3(6):443-452.
5. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(3):415-420.
6. Bettger J., Emmorey K., McCullough S., Bellugi U. Enhanced facial discrimination: Effects of experience with American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 1997, 2(4):223-233.
7. Colmenero J.M., Catena A., Fuentes L.J., Ramos M.M. Mechanisms of visuospatial orienting in deafness. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16(6):791-805.
8. Corina D., Chiu Y.S., Knapp H., Greenwald R., San Jose-Robertson L., Braun A. Neural correlates of human action observation in hearing and deaf subjects. Brain Research 2007, 1152:111-129.
9. Corina D., Singleton J. Developmental social cognitive neuroscience: Insights from deafness. Child Development 2009, 80(4):952-967.
10. Dye M.W., Baril D.E., Bavelier D. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(8):1801-1811.
11. Dye M.W., Hauser P.C., Bavelier D. Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: Possible implications for acquiring meaning from print. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008, 1145:71-82.
12. Fechner G.T. Elemente der Psychophysik, II 1860, 311-313.
13. Fine I., Finney E.M., Boynton G.M., Dobkins K.R. Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(10):1621-1637.
14. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., Jakobson L.S., Carey D.P. Perceiving the world and grasping it. A neurological dissociation. Nature 1991, 349:154-156.
15. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 1991, 350:498-500.
16. Heilman K.M., Bowers D., Shelton P. Attention to near and far space: The third dichotomy. Behavioural Brain Research 1990, 13:552-553.
17. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):67-99.
18. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Review Neuroscience 2007, 8(5):393-402.
19. Kraus N., Nicol T. Brainstem origins for cortical 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory system. Trends in Neuroscience 2005, 28(4):176-181.
20. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(3):451-468.
21. Lavie N., Tsal Y. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 56(2):183-197.
22. Livingstone M., Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988, 240(4853):740-749.
23. Mennemeier M., Wertman E., Heilman K.M. Neglect of near peripersonal space. Evidence for multidirectional attentional systems in humans. Brain 1992, 115(Pt 1):37-50.
24. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Neville H.J., Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research 1987, 405(2):268-283.
26. Pitzalis S., Galletti C., Huang R.S., Patria F., Committeri G., Galati G., et al. Wide-field retinotopy defines human cortical visual area v6. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(30):7962-7973.
27. Prado J., Clavagnier S., Otzengerger H., Scheiber C., Kennedy D.N., Perenin M.T. Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron 2005, 48:849-858.
28. Previc F.H. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioural Brain Research 1990, 13:519-575.
29. Previc F.H. The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:123-164.
30. Proksch J., Bavelier D. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(5):687-701.
31. Rauschecker J.P., Tian B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of " what" and " where" in auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000, 97(22):11800-11806.
32. Rovamo J., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 1979, 37:495-510.
33. Sladen D.P., Tharpe A.M., Ashmead D.H., Wesley Grantham D., Chun M.M. Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: Effects of stimulus compatibility. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 2005, 48(6):1529-1537.
34. Stevens C., Neville H. Neuroplasticity as a double-edged sword: Deaf enhancements and dyslexic deficits in motion processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(5):701-714.
35. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT press, Cambridge. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
36. Vuilleumier P., Valenza N., Mayer E., Reverdin A., Landis T. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology 1998, 43:406-410.
37. Weiss P.H., Marshall J.C., Wunderlich G., Tellmann L., Halligan P.W., Freund H.J., et al. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 2000, 123(Pt 12):2531-2541.
38. Weiss P.H., Marshall J.C., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors?. Neuroimage 2003, 18(4):837-846.