IUCN red listing of crop wildrelatives: Is a national approachas difficult as some think?

Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 211-242

  Magos Brehm, J ^a,b   Mitchell, M ^b   Maxted, N ^b   Ford Lloyd, B V ^b   Martins LouCao M A ^a,c  

^a Museu Nacional de Historia Natural Universidade de Lisboa   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954458197     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Akçakaya, H.R. (2000) Population viability analyses with demographically and spatially structured models. Ecological Bulletins 48, 23-38.
2. Akçakaya, H.R. and Sjögren-Gulve, P. (2000) Population viability analysis in conservation planning: an overview. Ecological Bulletins 48, 9-21.
3. Akçakaya, H.R., Ferson, S., Burgman, M.A., Keith, D.A., Mace, G.M. and Todd, C.A. (2000) Making consistent classifications under uncertainty. Conservation Biology 14, 1001-1013.
4. Albuquerque, C., Fonseca, J.P. and Bernardes, C. (2003) Relatório Técnico do Plano de Ordenamento do Parque Natural de Sintra/Cascais. PNSC, Instituto da Conservação da Natureza.
5. ANTHOS (2005). Anthos. Sistema de información de las plantas de España. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC - Fundación Biodiversidad. Available at: http://programanthos.org (accessed 16 September 2005)
6. Avery, M., Gibbons, D.W., Porter, R., Tew, T., Tucker, G. and Williams, G. (1995) Revising the British Red Data List for birds: the biological basis of UK conservation priorities. Ibis 137, 232-239.
7. Bañares, Á., Blanca, G., Güemes, J., Moreno Saiz, J.C. and Ortiz, S. (eds) (2004) Atlas y Libro Rojo de la Flora Vascular Amenazada de España. Dirección para la Biodiversidad, Publicaciones del O.A.P.N., Madrid.
8. Barreto Caldas, F., Séneca, A.M., Almeida da Silva, R., Carvalho, A.C., Branco, H.A., Alves, H. and Honrado, J.J. (1996) Distribuição Geográfica e Estatuto de Ameaça das Espécies da Flora a Proteger. Relatório final. Núcleo de Ecologia Vegetal, ICETA. Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
9. Boyce, M.S. (1992) Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 481-506.
10. Burgman, M.A., Keith, D.A. and Walshe, T.V. (1999) Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis for threatened Australian plant species. Risk Analysis 19 (4), 585-598.
11. Burton, J. (2003) On Red Lists and IUCN. PlantTalk 32, 4-5.
12. Butchart, S.H.M., Stattersfield, A.J., Bennun, L., Shutes, A.S.M., Akçakaya, H.R., Baillie, J.E.M., Stuart, S.N., Hilton-Taylor, C. and Mace, G.M. (2004) Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List indices for birds. PLoS Biology 2(12), e383. Available at: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/ journal.pbio.0020383#AFF3 (accessed 25 September 2005)
13. Callmander, M.W., Schatz, G.E and Lowrey II, P.P (2005) IUCN Red List assessment and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: taxonomists must act now. Taxon 54(4), 1047-1050.
14. CBD (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
15. CBD (2002) Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
16. Cheffings, C.M. and Farrell, L. (eds) (2005) The Vascular Plant Red Data List for Great Britain. Species Status 7, 1-116. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
17. Colling, G. (2005) Red List of the Vascular Plants of Luxembourg. Ferrantia 42. Available at: http://www.mnhn.lu/recherche/ferrantia/publications/Ferrantia42.pdf (accessed 18 August 2005)
18. De Koe, T., Sequeira, M.M., Bento, J., Aranha, J.T. and Varejão, E. (1998) Douro Internacional (incl. Bacia da Ribeira de Mós). Habitats Naturais e de Espécies da Flora de Portugal (Continente). Relatório final (adenda e fichas). Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
19. Dennis, B., Munholland, P.L. and Scott, J.M. (1991) Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecological Monographs 61, 115-143.
20. DGRF (Direcção-Geral dos Recursos Florestais) and ISA-DEF (Instituto Superior de Agronomia - Departamento de Engenharia Florestal) (1990-2004) Cartografia das áreas queimadas, Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas.
21. Dobson, A.P. (1998) Conservation and Biodiversity. Scientific American Library, New York.
22. Domínguez Lozano, F., Moreno Saiz, J.C. and Sainz Ollero, H. (2004) Conservation listing and taxonomy in the Iberian vascular flora. Are we making progress? Planta Europa - 4th European Conference on the Conservation of Wild Plants Valencia (Spain) 17-20th September. Available at: http://www.nerium.net/plantaeuropa/Download/Procedings/Dominguez.pdf (accessed 10 January 2006)
23. Eaton, M.A., Gregory, R.D., Noble, D.G., Robinson, J.A., Hughes, J., Procter, D., Brown, A.F. and Gibbons, D.W. (2005) Regional IUCN Red Listing: the process as applied to birds in the United Kingdom. Conservation Biology 19(5), 1557-1570.
24. European Commission (2000) Communication of the European Commission to the Council and to the Parliament on a European Community Biodiversity Strategy. Available at: http://biodiversitychm.eea.eu.int/convention/ECBS/fulltext.html (accessed 22 April 2004)
25. ESRI (2002) ArcView 3.3. ESRI, Redlands, California.
26. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1996) Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and the Leipzig Declaration. Adopted by the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources. FAO, Leipzig.
27. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2001) International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome, Italy.
28. Fidalgo, J.P.P. (1996) Plantas Prioritárias na Serra da Estrela. Relatório interno. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza.
29. Gärdenfors, U. (2001) Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(9), 511-516.
30. Gärdenfors, U. (ed.) (2005) The 2005 Red List of Swedish Species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
31. Gärdenfors, U., Rodríguez, J.P., Hilton-Taylor, C., Hyslop, C., Mace, G., Molur, S. and Poss, S. (1999) Draft guidelines for the application of the IUCN Red List criteria at national and regional levels. Species 31-32, 58-70.
32. Gärdenfors, U., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G.M. and Rodríguez, J.P. (2001) The application of the IUCN Red List Criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15(5), 1206-1212.
33. Golding, J.S. (2004) The use of specimen information influences the outcomes of Red List assessments: the case of southern African plant specimens. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 773-780.
34. Harlan, J. and de Wet, J. (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20, 509-517.
35. Hartley, S. and Kunin, W.E. (2003) Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk and conservation priority. Conservation Biology 17(6), 1559-1570.
36. Heywood, V.H. (1997) Introduction. In: Valdés, B., Heywood, V.H., Raimondo, F.M. and Zohary, D. (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on 'Conservation of the Wild Relatives of European Cultivated Plants'. Bocconea 7, 15-18.
37. Hoyt, E. (1988) Conserving the Wild Relatives of Crops. IBPGR-IUCN-WWF, Rome, Italy.
38. ICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza) (2006a) Plano Sectorial da rede Natura 2000. Fichas de caracterização ecológica e de gestão. Version January 2006. Available at: http://www. icn.pt/psrn2000/caract_flora.htm (accessed 26 January 2006)
39. ICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza) (2006b) Plano Sectorial da rede Natura 2000. Fichas de caracterização ecológica e de gestão. Thymus carnosus Boiss. Version January 2006. Available at: http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_naturais/flora/Thymus% 20carnosus.pdf (accessed 26 January 2006)
40. ICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza) (2006c) Plano Sectorial da rede Natura 2000. Fichas de caracterização ecológica e de gestão. Narcissus asturiensis (Jordan) Pugsley. Version January 2006. Available at: http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_ naturais/ flora/Narcissus%20asturiensis.pdf (accessed 26 January 2006)
41. ICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza) (2006d) Plano Sectorial da rede Natura 2000. Fichas de caracterização ecológica e de gestão. Narcissus cyclamineus DC. Version January 2006. Available at: http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_naturais/flora/ Narcissus% 20cyclamineus.pdf (accessed 26 January 2006)
42. ICN (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza) (2006e) Plano Sectorial da rede Natura 2000. Fichas de caracterização ecológica e de gestão. Plantago algarbiensis Samp. Version January 2006. Available at: http://www.icn.pt/psrn2000/caracterizacao_valores_naturais/flora/Plantago% 20algarbiensis.pdf (accessed 26 January 2006)
43. IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute) (2000a) In situ conservation in natural ecosystems (Crop Wild Relatives). Available at: http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/themes/in_situ_ project/home/insituhome.htm (accessed 7 April 2004)
44. IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute) (2000b) In situ conservation of crop wild relatives through enhanced information management and field application. A UNEP/GEF PDF B Project linking countries and international conservation agencies. Available at: http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/themes/in_situ_project/wild_relatives/gef.htm (accessed 7 April 2004)
45. IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute) (2003) High priority for crop wild relatives. Available at: http://ipgri-pa.grinfo.net/nucleus/plugins/print/print.php?itemid=8 (accessed 3 March 2004)
46. Iriondo, J.M. (1996) The survey and modelling of small plant populations as a basis for developing conservation strategies. Bocconea 5, 151-157. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (1994) IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge. Available at: http://www.redlist.org/info/categories_criteria1994 (accessed 8 May 2005)
47. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK. Available at: http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/redlists/redlistcat senglish.pdf (accessed 5 January 2005)
48. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK. Available at: http://app.iucn.org/ webfiles/doc/SSC/SSCwebsite/Red_List/regionalguidelinesEn.pdf (accessed 5 January 2005)
49. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (ed.) (2004) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland/ Cambridge, UK. Available at: http://www.redlist.org/ (accessed 5 January 2005)
50. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2005a) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. IUCN. Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Available at: http://app.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/ SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed 15 May 2005)
51. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (ed.) (2005b) Resolution 3.013: The uses of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. In: Resolutions and Recommendations: World Conservation Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 17-25 November 2004, pp. 14-16. Available at: http://app.iucn.org/congress/members/WCC_ Res_Recs_ENGLISH.pdf (accessed 14 May 2005)
52. IUCN/SSC (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Species Survival Committee) (1999) The IUCN Criteria Review: Report of the Marine Workshop. Report of a workshop held at the Asia centre of Japan, Tokyo on 16-17 January 1999, part of the review of the IUCN Criteria for listing threatened species. Available at: http://app.iucn.org/webfiles/ doc/SSC/RedList/CriteriaReview_Marine_Workshop.pdf (accessed 14 May 2005)
53. Jain, S.K. (1975) Genetic reserves. In: Frankel, O.H. and Hawkes, J.G. (eds) Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 379-396.
54. Keith, P. and Marion, L. (2002) Methodology for drawing up a red list of threatened freshwater fish in France. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 12, 169-179.
55. Keith, D.A., Chalson, J.M. and Auld, T.D. (1997) Assessing the status of threatened plants: a new methodology and an application to the vascular flora of New South Wales, unpublished report, NSW NPWS. In: Burgman, M.A., Keith, D.A. and Walshe, T.V. (1999) Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis for threatened Australian plant species. Risk Analysis 19(4), 585-598.
56. Keith, D.A., Auld, T.D., Ooi, M.K.J. and Mackenzie, B.D.E. (2000) Sensitivity analyses of decision rules in World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria using Australian plants. Biological Conservation 94, 311-319.
57. Keith, D.A., McCarthy, M.A., Regan, H., Regan, T., Bowles, C., Drill, C., Craig, C., Pellow, B., Burgman, M.A., Master, L.L., Ruckelshaus, M., Mackenzie, B., Andelman, S.J. and Wade, P.R. (2004) Protocols for listing threatened species can forecast extinction. Ecology Letters 7, 1101-1108.
58. Kell, S.P., Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Hilton-Taylor, C., Pollock, C. and Strahm, W. (2004) Crop Wild Relatives: A Vital Resource for a Sustainable Future. Poster presentation given at the 3rd IUCN World Conservation Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, November. Available at: http://www.pgrforum.org/Documents/Poster_presentations/WCC_2004.pdf (accessed 9 March 2006)
59. Keller, V. and Bollmann, K. (2004) From Red Lists to species of conservation concern. Conservation Biology 18(6), 1636-1644.
60. Kindvall, O. and Gärdenfors, U. (2003) Temporal extrapolation of PVA results in relation to the IUCN Red List Criterion E. Conservation Biology 17(1), 316-321.
61. Lacy, R.C. (2000) Considering threats to the viability of small populations with individual-based models. Ecological Bulletins 48, 39-51.
62. Lamoreux, J., Akçakaya, H.R., Bennun, L., Collar, N.J., Boitani, L., Brackett, D., Bräutigam, A., Brooks, T.M., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B., Gärdenfors, U., Hilton- Taylor, C., Mace, G., Stein, B.A. and Stuart, S. (2003) Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(5), 214-215.
63. Lacy, R.C. (2000) Considering threats to the viability of small populations with individual-based models. Ecological Bulletins 48, 39-51.
64. Lawton, J.H. (1993) Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 409-413.
65. Lunney, D., Curtin, A., Ayers, D., Cogger, H.G. and Dickman, C.R. (1996) An ecological approach to identifying the endangered fauna of New South Wales. Pacific Conservation Biology 2, 212-231.
66. MacDougall, A.S., Loo, J.A., Clayden, S.R., Goltz, J.G. and Hinds, H.R. (1998) Defining conservation priorities for plant taxa in southeastern New Brunswick, Canada using herbarium records. Biological Conservation 86, 325-338.
67. Mace, G.M. and Kershaw, M. (1997) Extinction risk and rarity on an ecological timescale. In: Kunin, W.E. and Gaston, K.J. (eds) The Biology of Rarity: The Causes and Consequences of Rare-Common Differences. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 131-149.
68. Mace, G.M. and Lande, R. (1991) Assessing extinction threats: towards a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5, 148-157.
69. Magos Brehm, J. (2003) Criação de um Banco de Sementes Representativo da Flora Afectada pela Construção da Barragem do Alqueva. Relatório Final de Bolsa de Iniciação Científica. Banco de Sementes António Belo Correia, Museu, Laborátorio e Jardim Botânico da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
70. Magos Brehm, J. (2004) Conservation of Wild Legumes in Portugal. MSc Dissertation, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
71. Matsuda, H. (2003) Challenges posed by the precautionary principle and accountability in ecological risk assessment. Environmetrics 14, 245-254.
72. Maxted, N., van Slageren, M.W. and Rihan, J. (1995) Ecogeographic surveys. In: Guarino, L., Ramanatha Rao, V. and Reid, R. (eds) Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 255-286.
73. Maxted, N., Hawkes, J.G., Ford-Lloyd, B.V. and Williams, J.T. (1997a) A practical model for in situ genetic conservation. In: Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V. and Hawkes, J.G. (eds) Plant Genetic Conservation: The In Situ Approach. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 545-592.
74. Maxted, N., Hawkes, J.G., Guarino, L. and Sawkins, M. (1997b) The selection of taxa for plant genetic conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44, 337-348.
75. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Jury, S.L., Kell, S.P. and Scholten, M. (2006) Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(8), 2673-2685.
76. Meilleur, B.A. and Hodgkin, T. (2004) In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and trends. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 663-684.
77. Menges, E.S. (2000) Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. TREE 15(2), 51-56.
78. Millsap, B.A., Gore, J.A., Runde, D.E. and Cerulean, S.I. (1990) Setting the priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monographs Supplement, Journal of Wildlife Management 54, 5-57.
79. Ministério do Ambiente (1999) Plano de Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Sado. 1a fase, Analise e Diagnostico da Situacao Actual. Anexo Temático 1. Análise Biofísica. Parte 5. Análise da Fauna e da Flora e Vegetação. Ministério do Ambiente, Lisboa, Portugal.
80. Ministério do Ambiente (2000) Plano de Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Sado. Volume III. Análise - Parte 3. Subsistema Ambiental (Rev. [n°00] - data [31-05-00]). Ministério do Ambiente, Lisboa, Portugal.
81. Mitchell, M. (2004) Regional Red List Assessment of Crop Wild Relatives in Europe. MSc Dissertation, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
82. Moreno Saiz, J.C., Domínguez Lozano, F. and Sainz Ollero, H. (2003) Recent progress in conservation of threatened Spanish vascular flora: a critical review. Biological Conservation 113, 419-431.
83. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1996) Saving Biological Diversity: Economic Incentives. OECD, Paris.
84. Pinto, M.J.G., Cotrim, H. and Draper, D.M. (1996a) Distribuição Geográfica e Estatuto de Ameaça das Espécies da Flora a Proteger. 5° Relatório de Progresso e 3° Relatório Adicional ao Protocolo de Colaboração. Museu, Laboratório e Jardim Botânico da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
85. Pinto, M.J.G., Cotrim, H. and Draper, D.M. (1996b) Distribuição Geográfica e Estatuto de Ameaça das Espécies da Flora a Proteger. 6° Relatório de Progresso e 4° Relatório Adicional ao Protocolo de Colaboração (relatório final do sub-projecto 'Lagoas'). Museu, Laboratório e Jardim Botânico Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
86. Pinto-Gomes, C. (1996) Distribuição Geográfica e Estatuto de Ameaça das espécies da Flora a Proteger. Relatório final. Universidade de Évora, Évora.
87. Planta Europa and the Council of Europe (2002) European Plant Conservation Strategy. Council of Europe and Planta Europa, The Hague, The Netherlands.
88. Possingham, H.P., Andelman, S.J., Burgman, M.A., Medellín, R.A., Master, L.L. and Keith, D.A. (2002) Limits to the use of threatened species lists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (11), 503-507.
89. Prescott-Allen, R. and Prescott Allen, C. (1983) Genes from the Wild: Using Wild Genetic Resources for Food and Raw Materials. Earthscan Publications, London, p. 112.
90. Rabinovitz, D., Cairns, S. and Dillon, T. (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of British Isles. In: Soule, M.E. (ed.) Conservation Biology: Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 182-204.
91. Rodrigues, A.S.L., Pilgrim, J.D., Lamoreux, J.F., Hoffmann, M. and Brooks, T.M. (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12(2), 71-76.
92. Rosselló-Graell, A., Marques, I. and Draper, D. (2003) Segunda localidad de Narcissus cavanillesii A. Barra & G. López (Amaryllidaceae) para Portugal. Acta Botanica Malacitana 28, 196-197.
93. Samways, M.J. (2003) Marginality and national Red Listing of species. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2523-2525.
94. Schoen, D.J. and Brown, A.H.D. (1993) Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic markers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90(22), 10623-10627.
95. Siebert, S.J. and Smith, G.F. (2004) Lessons learned from the SABONET Project while building capacity to document the botanical diversity of southern Africa. Taxon 53(1), 119-126.
96. Sjögren-Gulve, P. and Hanski, I. (2000) Metapopulation viability analysis using occupancy model. Ecological Bulletins 48, 53-71.
97. Ter Steege, H., Jansen-Jacobs, M.J. and Datadin, V.K. (2000) Can botanical collections assist in a National Protected Area Strategy in Guyana? Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 215-240.
98. Vavilov, N.I. (1926) Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding 16, 1-248.
99. VV.AA. (2000) Lista Rioja de la Flora Vascular Española. Conservación Vegetal 6, 11-38.
100. Williams, P.H., Humphries, C.J. and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1993) Measuring biodiversity: taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities. Australian Systematic Botany 4, 665-679.
101. Willis, F., Moat, J. and Paton, A. (2003) Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 1537-1552.