The effects of spatial processing load and collaboration technology on team performance in a simulated C2 environment

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 250, Issue , 2007, Pages 37-44

  Funke, Gregory J ^a   Galster, Scott M ^b  

^a GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration technology; command and control; RoboFlag simulation; team performance

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGY; COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; COMMAND AND CONTROL; RESEARCH APPROACH; ROBOFLAG; SIMULATED VEHICLES; SIMULATION-BASED; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS; SPATIAL PROCESSING; TEAM COMMUNICATION; TEAM PERFORMANCE; TEXT-BASED COMMUNICATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS;

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; TECHNOLOGY;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 77954454837     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1362550.1362561     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Albert, D.S. & Hayes, R.E. (2003). Power to the Edge. Washington, DC: CCRP Publication Series.
2. Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Baltes, B.B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C., & LaGanke, J.S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
4. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195-202.
5. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N.J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. D'Andrea, R., & Babish, M. (2003). The RoboFlag testbed. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 22, 656-660.
7. Funke, G.J., Galster, S.M., Nelson, W.T., & Dukes, A.W. (2006). Instant messaging and team performance in a simulated command and control environment. Proceedings of the 2006 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. San Diego, CA.
8. Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science/North Holland.
9. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95. (Pubitemid 40289741)
10. Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
11. Taylor, R.M. (1990). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478, pp. 3-1 and 3-17). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
12. Wickens, C.D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.