A mathematical model and a heuristic approach for design of the hybrid manufacturing systems to facilitate one-piece flow

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 48, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 5195-5220

  Satoglu, Sule Itir ^a   Durmusoglu, Mehmet Bulent ^a   Ertay, Tijen ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

alternative machines!; hybrid cellular manufacturing system; mathematical modelling; one piece flow

Indexed keywords

BACKFLOW; BUDGET CONSTRAINT; CELLULAR CONFIGURATION; CELLULAR MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; DECISION RULES; DESIGN RULES; FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE; HEURISTIC APPROACH; HYBRID MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL PROBLEM; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; LINE DESIGN; MANUFACTURING CELLS; MANUFACTURING LEAD-TIME; MATHEMATICAL MODELLING; MATRIX; ONE-PIECE FLOW; PRODUCTION RESEARCH; TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM; UNIDIRECTIONAL FLOW;

CELLULAR MANUFACTURING; FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MACHINE DESIGN;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 77954452922     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540903089544     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aneke, N.A.G. and Carrie, A.S., 1986. A design technique for the layout of multi-product flow lines. International Journal of Production Research, 24 (3), 471-481.
2. Black, J.T., 2007. Design rules for implementing Toyota Production System. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (16), 3639-3664.
3. Durmusoglu, M.B. and Nomak, A., 2005. GT cells design and implementation in a glass mould production system. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 48 (3), 525-536.
4. Ertay, T., 1998. Simulation approach in comparison of a pull system in a cell production system with a push system in a conventional production system according to flexible cost: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 56 (7), 145-155.
5. Feyzioglu, O. and Pierreval, H., 2009. Hybrid organisation of functional departments and manufacturing cells in the presence of imprecise data. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (2), 343-368.
6. Gravel, M., Price, W., and Gagne, C., 2000. An interactive tool for designing manufacturing cells for an assembly job-shop. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (2), 309-322.
7. Harhalakis, G., Minis, T.L., and Nagi, R., 1996. A practical method for design of hybrid-type production facilities. International Journal of Production Research, 34 (4), 897-918.
8. Hirano, H., (1995). Five pillars of the visual workplace: The sourcebook for 5S implementation. Translated by Bruce Talbot. Portland: Productivity Press.
9. Ioannou, G., 2006. Time-phased creation of hybrid manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2), 183-198.
10. Kang, S.L. and Wemmerlöv, U., 1993. A work load-oriented heuristic methodology for manufacturing cell formation allowing reallocation of operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 69 (3), 292-311.
11. Kulak, O., Durmusoglu, M.B., and Tufekci, S., 2005. A complete cellular manufacturing system design methodology, based on axiomatic design principles. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 48 (4), 765-787.
12. Liker, J., 2004. The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Marsh, R.F., Shafer, S.M., and Meredith, J.R., 1999. A comparison of cellular manufacturing research presumptions with practice. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (14), 3119-3138.
14. Miltenburg, J., 2001. One-piece flow manufacturing on U-shaped production lines: A tutorial. IIE Transactions, 33 (4), 303-321.
15. Murthy, V.R. and Srinivasan, G., 1995. Fractional cell formation in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (5), 1323-1337.
16. Park, S. and Suresh, N.C., 2003. Performance of Fuzzy ART neural network and hierarchical clustering for part-machine grouping based on operation sequences. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (14), 3185-3216.
17. Richards, A. and How, J., 2005. Mixed-integer programming for control. American Control Conference, 8-10 June, Portland, OR, USA. IEEE Xplore, Digital Library, 2676-2683.
18. Seifoddini, H., 1989. Single linkage versus average linkage clustering in machine cells formation applications. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 16 (3), 419-426.
19. Sekine, K., 1990. One-piece flow: Cell design for transforming the production process. Cambridge: Productivity Press.
20. Shafer, S.M., Kern, G.M., and Wei, J.C., 1992. A mathematical programming approach for dealing with exceptional elements in CM. International Journal of Production Research, 30 (5), 1029-1036.
21. Shambu, G. and Suresh, N.C., 2000. Performance of hybrid cellular manufacturing systems: A computer simulation investigation. European Journal of Operational Research, 120 (2), 436-458.
22. Shanker, R. and Vrat, P., 1999. Some design issues in cellular manufacturing using the fuzzy programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (11), 2545-2563.
23. Suh, N. P., 1990. The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Suresh, N.C., 1991. Partitioning work centres for group technology: Insights from an analytical model. Decision Sciences, 22 (4), 772-791.
25. Suresh, N.C. and Meredith, J.R., 1994. Coping with the loss of pooling synergy in cellular manufacturing systems. Management Science, 40 (4), 466-483.
26. Venkataramanaiah, S. and Krishnaiah, K., 2002. Hybrid heuristic for design of cellular manufacturing systems. Production Planning & Control, 13 (3), 274-283.
27. Viguier, F. and Pierreval, H., 2004. An approach to the design of a hybrid organisation of workshops into functional layout and group technology cells. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 17 (2), 108-116.
28. Wu, T.H., Chang, C.C., and Chung, S.H., 2008. A simulated annealing algorithm for manufacturing cell formation problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (3), 1609-1617.