Preference-based quality of life of end-stage ankle arthritis treated with arthroplasty or arthrodesis

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 563-566

  Slobogean, Gerard P ^a   Younger, Alastair ^a   Apostle, Kelly L ^a   Marra, Carlo A ^a   Wing, Kevin ^a   Penner, Murray ^a   Daniels, Tim ^a   Glazebrook, Mark ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ankle arthritis; Ankle arthrodesis; Health state values; Quality of life; Total ankle arthroplasty; Utilities

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANKLE ARTHRITIS; ANKLE ARTHRODESIS; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANKLE; ARTHRODESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHRITIS; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954450969     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0563     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anderson, T; Montgomery, F; Carlsson, A: Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg. 85:1321-9, 2003.
2. Brauer, CA; Neumann, PJ; Rosen, AB: Trends in cost effectiveness analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 457:42-8, 2007.
3. Brazier, J; Roberts, J; Deverill, M: The estimation of preferencebased measures of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 21:271-92, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
4. Brazier, JE; Roberts, J: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 42:851-9, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. mlr.0000135827.18610.0d
5. Fryback, DG; Dunham, NC; Palta, M; et al.: US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care. 45:1162-70, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR. 0b013e31814848f1
6. Glazebrook, M; Daniels, T; Younger, A; et al.: Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90:499-505, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/ JBJS.F.01299
7. Hunink, M; Glasziou, P; Siegel, J; et al.: Decision making in health and medicine. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
8. Kopec, JA; Willison, KD: A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 56:317-25, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00609-1
9. Marra, CA; Esdaile, JM; Guh, D; et al.: A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care. 42:1125-31, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200411000-00012
10. Russell, LB; Gold, MR; Siegel, JE; Daniels, N; Weinstein, MC: The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 276:1172-7, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama. 276.14.1172
11. SooHoo, NF; Kominski, G: Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86:2446-55, 2004.
12. Thomas, R; Daniels, TR; Parker, K: Gait analysis and functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 88:526-35, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00521
13. Walters, SJ; Brazier, JE: What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 1:4, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-4