Use of advanced CFD tool to characterize hydrodynamic of commercial UF membrane module

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 9, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 253-258

  Glucina, K ^a   Derekx, Q ^a   Langlais, C ^a   Laine, J M ^a  

^a CIRSEE   (France)

Author keywords

Design; Membrane; Modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954439616     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.814     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Wiesner, M., Hackney, J., Sethi, S., Jacangelo, J., and Laîné, J.-M., 1994. Cost estimates for membrane filtration and conventional treatment. J. AWWA, 87 (12):33–41.
2. Pearce, G., 2007. Introduction to membranes:Manufacturers' comparison:part 1. Filtration & Separation, 44 (10) October:36–38.
3. Colas, F., Bonnelye, V., and Abidine, N., 2002. Development of a new hollow-fiber module for large ultrafiltration plants. ICOM:International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes, Toulouse, FRANCE (07/07/2002), 148 (1–3):389–394.
4. Crozes, G., Jacangelo, J., Anselme, C., and Laîné, J. M., Impact of ultrafi ltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling. Proc. AWWA Membrane Technology Conf. pp. 457–485. Reno, Nevada
5. Ghidossi, R., Veyret, D., and Moulin, P., 2005. Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes:State of the art and opportunities. Chem. Eng. Process., 45:437–454.
6. Do-Quang, Z., Cockx, A., Line, A., and Roustan, M., 1999. Computational fluid dynamics applied to water and wastewater treatment facility modeling. J. Environ. Eng. Pol., 1:137–147.
7. Espinasse, B., Bacchin, P., and Aimar, P., 2002. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration. Desalination, 146:91–96.