Relationship between soil and plant water status in wine grapes under various water deficit regimes

HortTechnology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 585-593

  Centeno, Ana ^a   Baeza, Pilar ^a   Lissarrague, José Ramón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Irrigation management; Leaf water potential; Semiarid conditions; Stomatal conductance; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954436427     PISSN: 10630198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/horttech.20.3.585     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irr. Drainage Papers 56:15-27.
2. Araujo, F.J., L.E. Williams, and M.A. Matthews. 1995. A comparative study of young 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) under drip and furrow irrigation. II. Growth, water use efficiency and nitrogen partitioning. Scientia Hort. 60:251-265.
3. Baeza, P., P. Sánchez-de-Miguel, A. Centeno, P. Junquera, R. Linares, and J.R. Lissarrague. 2007. Water relations between leaf water potential, photosynthesis and agronomic vine response as a tool for establishing thresholds in irrigation scheduling. Scientia Hort. 114:151-158.
4. Carbonneau, A. 1976. Principes et méthodes de mesure de la surface foliaire. Essai de caractérisation des types de feuillesdans le genre Vitis. Annales de l'Amélioration des Plantes 26:327-343.
5. Charlesworth, P. 2000. Irrigation insights no. 1: Soil water monitoring. Land and Water Australia, Canberra, Australia.
6. Cifré, J., J. Bota, J.M. Escalona, H. Medrano, and J. Flexas. 2005. Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? Agr. Ecosystems Environ. Photosyn. Abiotic Stresses 106:159-170.
7. Coombe, B.G. 1995. Growth stages of the grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 1:100-110.
8. Cuevas, E., P. Baeza, and J.R. Lissarrague. 2006. Variation in stomatal behaviour and gas exchange between mid-morning and mid-afternoon of north-south oriented grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. 'Tempranillo') at different levels of soil water availability. Scientia Hort. 108:173-180.
9. Davenport, J.R., R.G. Stevens, and K.M. Whitley. 2008. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture in drip-irrigated vineyards. HortScience 43:229-235.
10. Deloire, A., A. Carbonneau, H. Ojeda, and Z. Wang. 2004. La vigne et l'eau. J. Intl. Sci. Vigne Vin 38:1-13.
11. Dry, P.R. and B.R. Loveys. 1999. Grapevine shoot growth and stomatal conductance are conduced when part of the root system is dried. Vitis 38:151-156.
12. Dry, P.R., B.R. Loveys, M.G. McCarthy, and M. Stoll. 2001. Gestion des stratégies d'irrigation dans les vignobles australiens. Progrès Agricole et Viticole 118:457-470.
13. Düring, H. 1976. Studies on the environmentally controlled stomatal transpiration in grapevines. 1. Effects of light intensity and air humidity. Vitis 15:82-87.
14. Escalona, J.M., J. Flexas, J. Bota, and H. Medrano. 2003. Distribution of leaf photosynthesis and transpiration within grapevine canopies under different drought conditions. Vitis 42:57-64.
15. Flexas, J., J. Bota, J.M. Escalona, B. Sampol, and H. Medrano. 2002. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions and evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations. Funct. Plant Biol. 29:461-471.
16. Girona, J., M. Mata, J. del Campo, A. Arbonés, E. Bartra, and J. Marsal. 2006. The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig. Sci. 24:115-127.
17. Grimes, D.W. and L.E. Williams. 1990. Irrigation effects on plant water relations and productivity of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines. Crop Sci. 30:255-260.
18. Hanson, R.B., S. Orloff, and D. Peters. 2000. Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management. Calif. Agr. 54:38-42.
19. Hardie, J.W. and S. Martin. 2000. Shoot growth on de-fruited grapevines: A physiological indicator for irrigation scheduling. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6:52-58.
20. Iacono, F. and J.K. Sommer. 1996. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis and photorespiration in Vitis vinifera under field conditions: Effects of light climate and leaf position. Aust.J.Grape WineRes.2:10-20.
21. Intrigliolo, D.S. and J.R. Castel. 2006. Vine and soil-based measures of water status in a 'Tempranillo' vineyard. Vitis 45:157-163.
22. Lakso, A.N. 1985. The effects of water stress on physiological processes in fruit crop. Acta Hort. 171:275-286.
23. Matthews, M., M. Anderson, and H. Schultz. 1987. Phenologic and growth responsestoearlyandlateseasonwaterdeficits in 'Cabernet franc'. Vitis 26:147-160.
24. Medrano, H., J.M. Escalona, J. Cifré, J. Bota, and J. Flexas. 2003. A ten-year on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: Effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 30:607-619.
25. Myburgh, P.A. 2003. Responses of Vitis vinifera L. cv. 'Sultanina' to water deficits during various preand post-harvest phases under semi-arid conditions. South African J. Enol. Viticult. 24:25-33.
26. Nadler, A. and B. Heuer. 1997. Soil moisture levels and their relation to water potentials of cotton leaves. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 48:923-932.
27. Naor, A., B. Bravdo, and J. Gelobter. 1994. Gas exchange and water relations in field-grown 'Sauvignon blanc' grapevines. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 45:423-428.
28. Paranychianakis, N.V., S. Aggelides, and A.N. Angelakis. 2004. Influence of rootstock, irrigation level and recycled water on growth and yield of 'Sultanina' grapevines. Agr. Water Mgt. 69:13-27.
29. Prior, L.D. and A.M. Grieve. 1986. Water use and irrigation requirements of grapevine. Proc. 6th Austral. Wine Ind. Tech. Conf., Adelaide, South Australia, 14-17 July 1986. p. 165-168.
30. Schultz, H.R. 2003. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for nearisohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ. 26:1393-1405.
31. Stevens, R.M. and G. Harvey. 1996. Soil water depletion rates under large grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2:155-162.
32. Stevens, R.M. and T. Douglas. 1994. Distribution of grapevine roots and salt under drip and full-ground cover microjet irrigation systems. Irr. Sci. 15:147-152.
33. Thompson, R.B., M. Gallardo, L.C. Valdez, and M.D. Fernández. 2007. Using plant water status to define threshold values for irrigation management of vegetable crops using soil moisture sensors. Agr. Water Mgt. 88:147-158.
34. Toome, P. 2002. Soil moisture monitoring with gypsum blocks. Aust. N. Z. Grapegrower Winemaker 82-84:19-23.
35. Tregoat, O., C. Van Leeuwen, X. Choné, and J.P. Gaudillére. 2002. Étude du régime hydrique et de la nutrition azotée de la vigne par des indicateurs physiologi ques. J. Intl. Sci. Vigne Vin 36:133-142.
36. Turner, N.C. 1988. Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irr. Sci. 9:289-308.
37. van Leeuwen, C., O. Trégoat, X. Choné, and J.P. Gaudillére. 2001. The use of physiological indicators to assess vine water uptake and to manage vineyard irrigation. Aust.GrapegrowerWinemaker449:18-24.
38. Williams, L.E. 2002. L'irrigation desvignes en Californie. Le Progrès Agricole Viticole 119:37-46.
39. Williams, L.E. and F.J. Araujo. 2002. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:448-454.
40. Williams, L.E. and T.J. Trout. 2005. Re lationships among vine and soil-based measures of water status in a 'Thompson Seedless' vineyard in response to high frequency drip irrigation. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 56:357-366.
41. Williams, L.E., N.K. Dokoozlian, and R. Wample. 1994. Grape, p. 85-133. In: B. Schaffer and P.C. Anderson (eds.). Hand book of environmental physiology of fruit crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
42. Yuste, J., J.A. Rubio, and H.J. Peláez. 1999. Predawn leaf water potential and soil water content in vertical trellis under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions in 'Tempranillo' grapevines. Acta Hort. 493:309-321.
43. Yuste, J., J.A. Rubio, and M.A. Pérez. 2004. Influence of plant density and water regime on soil water use, water relations and productivity of trellis-trained 'Tem pranillo' grapevines. Acta Hort. 646: 187-192.