Optimization of the operations conditions in membrane bioreactors through the use of ASM3 model simulations

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 9, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 126-130

  Lobos, J ^a,b   Heran, M ^b   Grasmick, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b CIRAD   (France)

Author keywords

Active biomass; ASM; MBR control; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954418878     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.761     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Drews, A., and Kraume, M., 2005. Process improvement by application of membrane bioreactors. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 83 (A3):276–284.
2. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., and Loosdrecht, V., 2000. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, Scientific and technical report No. 9 London, UK:International Water Association.
3. Heran, M., Wisniewski, C., Orantes, J., and Grasmick, A., 2008. Measurement of kinetic parameters in a submerged aerobic membrane bioreactor fed on acetate and operated without biomass discharge. Biochem. Eng., 38-1:70–77.
4. Rosenberger, S., Krüger, U., Witzig, R., Manz, W., Szewzyk, U., and Kraume, M., 2002. Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Research, 36:413–420.
5. Sun, D. D., Khor, S. L., Teck Hay, C., and Leckie, J. O., 2007. Impact of prolonged sludge retention time on the performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 208:101–112.
6. Pirt, S. J., 1965. The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures. Proc R Soc London, 163B:224–231.
7. Pollice, A., Laera, G., Saturno, D., and Giordano, C., 2008. Effects of sludge retention time on the performance of a membrane bioreactor treating municipal sewage. J. Membrane Sci., 317:65–70.