Was the Dutch home birth trial properly registered and performed?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1162-1163

  Olsen, O ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; FEMALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS;

FEMALE; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77954410633     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02610.x     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Hendrix M, Van Horck M, Moreta D, Nieman F, Nieuwenhuijze M, Severens J, et al. Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands. BJOG 2009 116 : 537 542 discussion 542-4.
2. Nijhuis JG, Hendrix MJC. Home or Hospital Birth, Does it Really Matter? A Randomised Controlled Trial. 2005 Oct 11 [changed 2009 Apr 07; cited 2009 Nov 26]. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet].