Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery: A systematic review

Laryngoscope

Volumn 120, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1292-1297

  Rotenberg, Brian ^a   Tam, Samantha ^a   Ryu, Won Hyung A ^a   Duggal, Neil ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Endoscopic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Pituitary adenoma

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIABETES INSIPIDUS; DRAIN; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS ADENOMA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MICROSURGERY; NOSE DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

HUMANS; HYPOPHYSECTOMY; MICROSURGERY; NEUROENDOSCOPY; PITUITARY NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77954395192     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.20949     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Higgins TS, Courtemanche C, Karakla D, et al. Analysis of transnasal endoscopic versus transseptal microscopic approach for excision of pituitary tumors. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:649-652.
2. Duz B, Harman F, Secer HI, Bolu E, Gonul E. Transsphenoidal approaches to the pituitary: a progression in experience in a single centre. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150: 1133-1138; discussion 1138-1139.
3. Casler JD, Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 2005;115: 16-24. (Pubitemid 40096519)
4. Choe JH, Lee KS, Jeun SS, Cho JH, Hong YK. Endocrine outcome of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in functioning pituitary adenomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008;44:151-155.
5. Jain AK, Gupta AK, Pathak A, Bhansali A, Bapuraj JR. Excision of pituitary adenomas: randomized comparison of surgical modalities. Br J Neurosurg 2007;21:328-331. (Pubitemid 47221519)
6. Liu JC, Stewart MG. Teaching evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2007;40: 1261-1274, vii-viii.
7. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52: 377-384. (Pubitemid 28438523)
8. Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barron Y, et al. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2009;111:545-554.
9. Cho DY, Liau WR. Comparison of endonasal endoscopic surgery and sublabial microsurgery for prolactinomas. Surg Neurol 2002;58:371-375; discussion 375-376.
10. Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, Colao A, Ferone D, Lombardi G, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: an additional reason in support of surgery in the management of pituitary lesions. Skull Base Surg 1999;9:109-117. (Pubitemid 29281515)
11. Neal JG, Patel SJ, Kulbersh JS, Osguthorpe JD, Schlosser RJ. Comparison of techniques for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol 2007;21:203-206. (Pubitemid 46846353)
12. Dusick JR, Esposito F, Mattozo CA, Chaloner C, McArthur DL, Kelly DF. Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: the patient's perspective - survey results from 259 patients. Surg Neurol 2006;65:332-341; discussion 341-342.
13. White DR, Sonnenburg RE, Ewend MG, Senior BA. Safety of minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) compared with a traditional approach. Laryngoscope 2004;114: 1945-1948.
14. Shah S, Har-El G. Diabetes insipidus after pituitary surgery: incidence after traditional versus endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:377-379. (Pubitemid 34026923)