SWAT application to estimate design runoff curve number for South Korean conditions

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 2156-2170

  Kim, Nam Won ^a   Lee, Jin Won ^a   Lee, Jeongwoo ^a   Lee, Jeong Eun ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Asymptotic CN method; High slope watershed; Modified runoff curve number; Monsoon climate; South Korea; SWAT

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC CN METHOD; HIGH SLOPES; MONSOON CLIMATE; RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS; SOUTH KOREA;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS; ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; CLIMATE MODELS; DAMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; LANDFORMS; MOISTURE; PROBABILITY; RAIN; RUNOFF; SOILS; WATERSHEDS;

ESTIMATION;

CALIBRATION; COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN FLOOD; ESTIMATION METHOD; MONSOON; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEAK FLOW; PROBABILITY; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; UNIT HYDROGRAPH; WATERSHED;

SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 77954382287     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7638     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aitken AP. 1971. Yield estimation using a United States Soil Conservation Service approach. Final Report, Vol. 2, Report on Analysis Components, Australian Water Resources Council, Research Project 68/1, Hydrology of Small Rural Catchment Analysis Component(c), Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation.
2. Arnold JG, Fohrer N. 2005. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes 19(3): 563-572.
3. Arnold JG, Williams JR, Griggs RH, Sammons NB. 1990. SWRRB-A Basin Scale Simulation Model for Soil and Water Resources Management. Texas A&M Press: Texas.
4. Brezonik PL, Bierman VJ, Alexander R, Anderson J, Barko J, Dortch M, Hatch L, Hitchcock GL, Keeney D, Mulla D, Smith V, Walker C, Whitledge T, Wiseman WJ. 1999. Effects of reducing nutrient loads to surface waters within the Mississippi River Basin and the Gulf of Mexico: topic 4 report for the integrated assessment on hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. In NOAA Coastal Ocean Program. Decision Analysis Series, no. 18. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admnistration Coastal Ocean Office: Silver Spring; 113.
5. Carsel R, Imhoff J, Hummel P, Cheplick J, Donigan A. 1997. PRZM 3.1 Users Manual. National Exposure Research Lab, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Athens, Georgia.
6. Chaplot V. 2005. Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3-N loads predictions. Journal of Hydrology 312: 207-222.
7. Chaubey I, Cotter AS, Costello TA, Soerens TS. 2005. Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output Uncertainty. Hydrological Processes 19: 621-628.
8. Choi JY, Engel BA, Chung HW. 2002. Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve-number technique. Hydrological Processes 16: 3131-3150.
9. Cotter AS, Chaubey I, Costello TA, Soerens TS, Nelson MA. 2003. Water quality model output uncertainty as affected by spatial resolution of input data. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(4): 977-986.
10. DiLuzio M, Srinivasan R, Arnold J. 2001. ArcView Interface for SWAT2000: User's Guide. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Temple, Texas.
11. Dinaple T. 1965. Flood Peak Runoff and Associated Precipitation in Selected Drainage Basins in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Water-supply Paper 1813. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
12. Dixon B, Earls J. 2009. Resample or not? Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes 23: 1714-1724.
13. Earls J, Dixon B. 2006. Influence of resolution on the SWAT Model: examining neighbouring basins. Published on Conference CD, AWRA Specialty Conference, Houston, Texas.
14. Ebrahimian M, See LF, Ismail MH, Malek IA. 2009. Application of natural resources conservation service-curve number method for runoff estimation with GIS in the Kardeh Watershed, Iran. European Journal of Scientific Research 34(4): (No. 4): 575-590.
15. Garen DC, Daniel SM. 2005. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: uses, abuses, and future directions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(2): 377-388.
16. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green JG, Arnold JG. 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE 50(4): 1211-1250.
17. Gray DD, Katz PG, deMonsabert SM, Congo NP. 1982. Antecedent moisture probabilities. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE 108(IR2): 107-114.
18. Hawkins RH. 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119(2): 334-345.
19. Hawkins RH. 1998. Local sources for runoff curve numbers. Eleventh Annual Symposium of the Arizona, Hydrological Society, September 23-26, Tucson, Arizona.
20. Hawkins RH, Hjelmfelt AT, Zevenberger AW. 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve number. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 111(4): 330-340.
21. Hjelmfelt AT. 1991. Investigation of curve number procedure. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117(6): 725-737.
22. Hjelmfelt AT, Kramer KA, Burwell RE. 1982. Curve numbers as random variables. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rainfall- Runoff Modeling. Water Resources Publications: Littleton, Colorodo; 365-373.
23. Hoesein AA. 1986. Derivation of design runoff curve number from observed floods in the Murrumbidgee and Upper Murray basins.Thesis (M.Eng.Sc.), University of New South Wales.
24. Kim JD. 1989. Surface runoff computations from a small watershed using SCS triangular unit hydrograph method. Master thesis, Seoul National University.
25. Kim JH, Jung KS, Lee KY. 1999. Estimating curve number of SCS method for calculated runoff. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual Conference. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association: 227-231 (in Korean).
26. Kim NW, Lee J. 2008. Temporally weighted average curve number method for daily runoff simulation. Hydrological Processes 22(25): 4936-4948.
27. Kim NW, Lee J. 2010. Enhancement of channel routing module in SWAT. Hydrological Processes 24(1): 96-107.
28. Kim TC, Park SK, Kim ST, Cu JB. 1995. New concept of curve number applicable to the Korean Watersheds. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association: 295-300 (in Korean).
29. Knisel WG. 1980. CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems.USDA Conservation Research Report, Vol. 26, 643.
30. Krysanova V, Wechsung F, Arnold JG. 2000. SWIM User Manual. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research: Potsdam, Germany.
31. Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA. 1987. GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects on agricultural management systems. Transactions of the ASAE 30(5): 1403-1428.
32. Lim KJ, Heo S, Park Y, Kim J, Park J, Choi D, Kang H. 2007. Development of SWAT ArcView GIS Extension Patch. Agricultural Engineering GIS Environment System Laboratory, Kangwon National University. http://www.EnvSys.co.kr/~swat [7 May 2009.
33. Linsley RK. 1986. Flood estimates: how good are they? Water Resources Research 22(9): (Suppl. 9): 159S-164S.
34. Mamillapalli S, Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Engel BA. 1996. Effect of spatial variability on basin scale modeling. In Proceedings, Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 21-26 January 1996. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis: Santa Barbara.
35. McCuen RC. 2002. Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7(1): 43-48.
36. McCutcheon SC. 2003. Hydrologic evaluation of the curve number method for forest management in West Virginia. Report prepared for the West Virginia Division of Forestry, Charleston, West Virginia.
37. McCutcheon SC, Tedela NH, Adams MB, Swank W, Campbell JL, Hawkins RH, Dye CR. 2006. Rainfall-runoff relationships for selected eastern U.S. forested mountain watersheds: testing of the curve number method for flood analysis. Report prepared for the West Virginia Division of Forestry, Charleston, West Virginia.
38. Michel C, Andréassian V, Perrin C. 2005. Soil conservation service curve number method: how to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resources Research 41(2): W02011; DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003191.
39. Ministry of Science and Technology. 2007. Development of Anaylising System for Surface Water Hydrological Components. Korea Institute of Construction Technology: Republic of Korea.
40. Mishra SK, Pandey RP, Jain MK. 2008. A rain duration and modified AMC-dependent SCS-CN procedure for long duration rainfall-runoff events. Water Resources Management 22(7): 861-876.
41. Neitsch SL, Arnold JR, Kiniry JR, Williams JR. 2005. Soil and water assessment tool, theoretical documentation, version 2005 . Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA Temple Texas. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple Texas.
42. Pilgrim DH. 1987. Australian Rainfall and Runoff-A Guide to Flood Estimation. The institution of Engineers: Australia.
43. Ponce VM, Hawkins RH. 1996. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 1(1): 11-19.
44. Schneider LE, McCuen RH. 2005. Statistical guideline for curve number generation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131(3): 282-290.
45. Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, McEnroe BM, Sjostrom JW, Peyton RL. 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Kandfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for Version 3. EPA/600/R- 94/168b, September 1994. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC.
46. Terzoudi CB, Gemtos TA, Danalatos NG, Argyrokastritis I. 2007. Applicability of an empirical runoff estimation method in central Greece. Soil and Tillage Research 92: 198-212.
47. U.S. Corps of Engineers. 1985. HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package, Users Manual. U.S. Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center: Sacramento, California.
48. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004. Part 630: Hydrology. National Engineering Handbook.US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
49. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 1984. Computer Program for Project Formulation- Hydrology. Technical Release No. 20. USDA-NRCS: Washington, DC.
50. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55. USDA-NRCS: Washington, DC.
51. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2004. Part 630: Hydrology. National Engineering Handbook.
52. Williams JR. 1990. The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London (Part B: Biological Sciences) 329(1255): 421-428.
53. Williams JR, Nicks AD, Arnold JG. 1985. Simulator for Water Resources in rural basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering ASCE, 111: 970-986.
54. Wood MK, Blackburn WH. 1984. An evaluation of the hydrologic soil groups as used in the SCS runoff method on rangelands. Water Resources Bulletin 20: 379-389.
55. Young DF, Carleton JN. 2006. Implementation of a probabilistic curve number method in the PRZM runoff model. Environmental modelling and Software 21: 1172-1179.
56. Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP. 1989. AGNPS: a nonpoint source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(2): 168-173.
57. Yulianti JS, Lence BJ. 1999. Parameter uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling for use in hydraulic design. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(2): 245-251.