A role for ecology in male mate discrimination of immigrant females in Calopteryx damselflies?

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 506-518

  Wellenreuther, Maren ^a   Vercken, Elodie ^b   Svensson, ERik I ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive divergence; Ecological speciation; Genetic variation; Local adaptation; Male mate choice; Premating isolation

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; DAMSELFLY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; IMMIGRANT POPULATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; MORPHOLOGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CALOPTERYX; CALOPTERYX SPLENDENS; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 77954381968     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01464.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aguilar DJ, Dommanget JL. Guide des libellules d'europe et d'afrique du nord 1998, Lausanne, Delachaux et Niestlé
2. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I. Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on paternity and egg production rate in a water strider. Behavioral Ecology 1999, 10:358-365.
3. Askew RR. The dragonflies of Europe 2004, Colchester, BH & A Harley Ltd
4. Bateman AJ. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
5. Bonduriansky R. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Review 2001, 76:305-339.
6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach 2002, New York, NY, Springer
7. Corbet PS. Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata 1999, Colchester, Harley Books
8. Cordero A. Forced copulations and female contact guarding at a high male density in a calopterygid damselfly. Journal of Insect Behavior 1999, 12:27-37.
9. Cordero A, Andrés JA. Male coercion and convenience polyandry in a calopterygid damselfly. Journal of Insect Science 2002, 2:1-7.
10. Coyne JA, Orr HA. Speciation 2004, Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates
11. Crispo E, Bentzen P, Reznick DN, Kinnison MT, Hendry AP. The relative influence of natural selection and geography on gene flow in guppies. Molecular Ecology 2006, 15:49-62.
12. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 2000, 156:77-101.
13. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 2003, 421:259-264.
14. Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species 2004, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
15. Hanski I, Saccheri I. Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation. PLoS Biology 2006, 4:e129.
16. Härdling R, Gosden T, Aguilee R. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females. American Naturalist 2008, 172:259-271.
17. Hendry AP. Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 2001, 112-113:515-534.
18. Hendry AP, Nosil P, Riesenberg LH. The speed of ecological speciation. Functional Ecology 2007, 21:455-464.
19. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:907-916.
20. Judge KA, Brooks RJ. Chorus participation by male bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana: a test of the energetic constraint hypothesis. Animal Behavior 2001, 62:849-861.
21. Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 1999, 401:661.
22. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94:1282-1286.
23. Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:351-354.
24. Kotiaho JS. Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biological Review 2001, 76:365-376.
25. Lemaître J-F, Rigaud T, Cornet S, Bollache L. Sperm depletion, male mating behaviour and reproductive 'time-out' in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Animal Behaviour 2009, 77:49-54.
26. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsely DM, Jamieson L, Chou J, Schluter D. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 2004, 429:294-298.
27. McPeek MA, Gavrilets S. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 2006, 60:1967-1980.
28. Mopper S, Strauss S. Genetic variation and local adaptation in natural insect populations: effects of ecology, life history and behavior 1998, New York, NY, Chapman and Hall
29. Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL. Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the Lemon Tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 1982, 216:753-754.
30. Nosil P, Crespi BJ. Does gene flow constrain adaptive divergence or vice versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking sticks. Evolution 2004, 58:102-112.
31. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 2003, 270:1911-1918.
32. Nosil P, Vines TH, Funk DJ. Perspective: Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 2005, 59:705-719.
33. Plaistow SJ, Siva-Jothy MT. Energetic constraints and male mate securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma (Charpentier). Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences of London Series B, Biological Sciences 1996, 263:1233-1238.
34. Plaistow SJ, Tsubaki Y. A selective trade-off for territoriality and non-territoriality in the polymorphic damselfly Mnais costalis. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences of London Series B, Biological Sciences 2000, 267:969-975.
35. Proulx SR. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution 2001, 55:2401-2411.
36. Rundle HD. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 2002, 56:322-329.
37. Rundle HD, Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:336-352.
38. Sadeghi S, Kyndt T, Henri JD. Genetic diversity, population structure and taxonomy of Calopteryx splendens (Odonata: Calopterygidae): an AFLP analysis. European Journal of Entomology 2010, 107:137-146.
39. Schluter D. Ecological causes of speciation. Endless forms: species and speciation 1998, 19-32. Howard DJBerlocher SH. In, eds., 1st, edn., New York, NY, Oxford University Press
40. Schluter D. The ecology of adaptive radiation 2000, Oxford, Oxford University Press
41. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2001, 16:372-380.
42. Singh BN, Sisodia S. Frequency-dependent selection: minority male mating advantage in Drosophila. Current Science 2000, 78:141-150.
43. Stettmer C. Colonisation and dispersal patterns of banded (Calopteryx splendens) and beautiful demoiselles (C. virgo) (Odonate: Calopterygidae) in south-east German streams. European Journal of Entomology 1996, 93:579-593.
44. Svensson EI, Abbott J, Gosden T, Coreau A. Female polymorphisms, sexual conflict and limits to speciation processes in animals. Evolutionary Ecology 2009, 23:93-108.
45. Svensson EI, Eroukhmanoff F, Friberg M. Effects of natural and sexual selection on adaptive population divergence and premating isolation in a damselfly. Evolution 2006, 60:1242-1253.
46. Svensson EI, Friberg M. Selective predation on wing morphology in sympatric damselflies. American Naturalist 2007, 170:101-112.
47. Svensson EI, Karlsson K, Friberg M, Eroukhmanoff F. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of sexual isolation. Current Biology 2007, 17:1943-1947.
48. Svensson EI, Kristoffersen L, Oskarsson K, Bensch S. Molecular population divergence and sexual selection on morphology in the banded demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens). Heredity 2004, 93:423-433.
49. Tregenza T, Wedell N. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:1013-1027.
50. Trivers RL. Paternal investment and sexual selection. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1972, 136-179. Campbell B. In, ed., Chicago, IL, Aldine Press
51. Tynkkynen K, Rantala MJ, Suhonen J. Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2004, 17:759-767.
52. Van Voorhies W. Sperm production reduces nematode lifespan. Nature 1992, 360:457-459.
53. Via S, Bouck AC, Skillmann S. Reproductive isolation between divergent races of pea aphids on two hosts. II selection against migrants and hybrids in the parental environments. Evolution 2000, 54:1626-1637.
54. Waage JK. Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 1979, 33:104-116.
55. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2002, 17:313-320.
56. Wellenreuther M, Tynkkynen K, Svensson EI. Simulating range expansion: male mate choice and loss of premating isolation in damselflies. Evolution 2010, 64:242-252.