Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 342-350

  Rink, A D ^b   Kneist, W ^b   Radinski, I ^c   Guinot Barona, A ^a   Lang, H ^b   Vestweber, K H ^a  

^a Children's Hospital Leverkusen   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Department of Internal Medicine ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Continence; Pouch; Rectal cancer; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANORECTAL PHYSIOLOGY; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS CONTINENCE; ARTICLE; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; ILEALPOUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ILEOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANOMETER; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM RESECTION; REST; SENSATION; ULCERATIVE COLITIS; VOLUMETRY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; DEFECATION; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTUM;

EID: 77954379137     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01790.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, Fichera A, Kasza K, Karrison T, Hurst RD. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 2003, 238:433-41. discussion 42-5
2. Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Larson DR, Crownhart BS, Dozois RR. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 2007, 94:333-40.
3. Berger A, Tiret E, Parc R, Frileux P, Hannoun L, Nordlinger B, Ratelle R, Simon R. Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum. World J Surg 1992, 16:470-7.
4. Farouk R, Drew PJ, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Disruption of the internal anal sphincter can occur after transanal stapling. Br J Surg 1996, 83:1400.
5. Becker JM, LaMorte W, St Marie G, Ferzoco S. Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:653-60.
6. Silvis R, van Eekelen JW, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG. Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Relation with anal manometry and fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995, 38:383-8.
7. Lewis WG, Miller AS, Williamson ME, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Axon AT, Johnston D. The perfect pelvic pouch - what makes the difference? Gut 1995, 37:552-6.
8. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Gohl J, Hohenberger W, Matzel KE. Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:260-5.
9. Hallbook O, Nystrom PO, Sjodahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:332-8.
10. Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 1998, 41:740-6.
11. Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:660-7.
12. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W. Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997, 12:82-7.
13. Ho YH, Tan M, Leong AF, Seow-Choen F. Ambulatory manometry in patients with colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomoses: randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:793-9.
14. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986, 1:1479-82.
15. Perry RE, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Attwood SE. Manometric diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries. Am J Surg 1990, 159:112-6. discussion 6-7
16. Damon H, Henry L, Barth X, Mion F. Fecal incontinence in females with a past history of vaginal delivery: significance of anal sphincter defects detected by ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:1445-50. discussion 50-1
17. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 1999, 44:77-80.
18. Jehle EC, Haehnel T, Starlinger MJ, Becker HD. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995, 169:147-52. discussion 52-3
19. Kollmorgen CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Martenson JA, Illstrup DM. The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 1994, 220:676-82.
20. Ammann K, Kirchmayr W, Klaus A, Muhlmann G, Kafka R, Oberwalder M, de Vries A, Ofner D, Weiss H. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anal sphincter function in patients with carcinoma of the midrectum and low rectum. Arch Surg 2003, 138:257-61.
21. Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B, Holmstrom B, Mellgren A. Long-term effect of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 2006, 49:345-52.
22. Bengtsson J, Borjesson L, Lundstam U, Oresland T. Long-term function and manovolumetric characteristics after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 2007, 94:327-32.
23. Levitt MD, Kamm MA, Groom J, Hawley PR, Nicholls RJ. Ileoanal pouch compliance and motor function. Br J Surg 1992, 79:126-8.
24. Goldberg PA, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Morris G, Britton KE. Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function. Gut 1997, 40:790-3.
25. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Akervall S, Hulten L. Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 1990, 77:265-9.
26. Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J, Takase Y, Mikuni N, Ishikawa H. Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity predict early postoperative defecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:1145-51.
27. Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P, Liagre A, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F. Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses. Surgery 2000, 127:291-5.
28. Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S. Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997, 40:1409-13.
29. Rink AD, Nagelschmidt M, Radinski I, Vestweber K-H. Evaluation of vector-manometry for the characterization of functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008, 23:807-15.
30. Clewing MKA, Buhr HJ. Evaluation and validation of anal sphincter function by anal manometry. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1999, 99(Suppl.):397-402.
31. Zbar AP, Kmiot WA, Aslam M, Williams A, Hider A, Audisio RA, Chiappa A, deSouza N. Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction. Dis Colon Rectum 1999, 42:1411-8.